The
California bearing ratio (CBR) test is the most widely spread method of
determining the bearing strength of the pavement material and is fundamental to
pavement design practice in most countries. This test is expensive, laborious
and time consuming, and to overcome this, Quasi static cone penetrometer
machine was fabricated and used to measure the consistency limits (liquid
limit-LL, Plastic limit-PL and Plasticity index-PI), which were used to develop
an empirical equation to determine CBR. Soil samples were collected and
unsoaked CBR, PL, LL and PI were determined according to BS 1377 part 9 and BS
1377-2;1990.
Quasi static penetration forces at 20mm depth of penetration were also determined at
consistency limits. It was found that the force of 1020gf and 60gf was achieved at a depth of 20mm at PI and LL
respectively. The correlation and regression analysis between consistency limits,
and the experimental CBR obtained showed coefficient of determination, R2 = 0.907 between CBR and all the parameters using multiple linear regression
analysis (MLRA). The regression equation developed was used together with the
relationship developed between the Quasi static Penetration force at
consistency limits and the tested consistency limits to come up with the
General Empirical Equation. Verification of the formula showed that the
correlation can be used accurately to determine the un soaked CBR.
References
[1]
Katte, V.Y., Mfoyet, S.M., Manefouet, B., Wouatong, A.S.L. and Bezeng, L.A. (2018) Correlation of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Value with Soil Properties of Road Subgrade Soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37.
[2]
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (2018) National Budget Frame Work Paper Financial Year 2019/20-Financial Year 2023/2024. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development.
[3]
Teh, K.T., HASSIM, S., Muniandy, R., Omar, H. and Hassan, A. (2005) The Development of Road Construction Material Selection System (RC-mss). Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1313-1328.
[4]
BSI: Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, Part 2 (BS 1377-2). British Standards Institution, London, 1990.
[5]
Casagrande, A. (1958) Notes on the Design of the Liquid Limit Device. Géotechnique, 8, 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1958.8.2.84
[6]
Nugroho, S.A., Yusa, M. andSatibi, S. (2016) Value Estimation of California Bearing Ratio from Hand Cone Penetrometer Test for Pekanbaru Soils. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 26, 25-32.
[7]
Zumrawi, M.M.E. (2014) Prediction of In-Situ CBR of Subgrade Cohesive Soils from Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Soil Properties. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6, 439-442. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJET.2014.V6.738
[8]
Hrubesova, E., Lunackova, B. and Brodzki, O. (2016) Comparison of Liquid Limit of Soils Resulted from Casagrande Test and Modificated Cone Penetrometer Methodology. Procedia Engineering, 365, 364-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.063
[9]
Hovayni, P. (1958) A New Grooving Tool. Géotechnique, 8, 79.
[10]
Stone, K.J.L. and Kyambadde, B.S. (2007) The Determination of Strength and Index Properties of Fine Grained Soils Using a Soil Minipenetrometer. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133, 667-673. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(667)
[11]
Stone, K.J.L. and Phan, K.D. (1995) Cone Penetration Test near the Plastic Limit. Géotechnique, 45, 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1995.45.1.155
[12]
Muhwezi, L., Acai, J. and Otim, G. (2014) An Assessment of the Factors Causing Delays on Building Construction Projects in Uganda. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 3, 13-23.
[13]
Ahmed Nawal Ahsan, (2014) Pavement Performance Monitoring Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer and Geogauge during Construction. Master’s Thesis, The University of Texas, Arlington, 8-11.
[14]
Gebremariam G. Feleke and Alemgena A. Araya, (2016) Prediction of CBR Using DCP for Local Subgrade Materials. Proceedings of the 2016 International Transport and Road Research Conference (iTRARR), Kenya, 16-18 March 2016.
[15]
Sven Hansbo, (1957) A New Approach for Determination of Shear Strength of Clay by Fall-Cone Test. 19. Royal Swedish Geo Technical Institute Proceedings No.14. p. 19.
[16]
Iqbal, F., Kumar, A. and Murtaza, A. (2018) Co-Retationship between California Bearing Ratio and Index Properties of Jamshoro Soils. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, 3, 185-190. https://doi.org/10.22581/muet1982.1801.16