|
|
Modern Management 2023
基于AHP-FCE模型的黑龙江省高校线上课程教学质量评价
|
Abstract:
选择以黑龙江省高校为研究对象，对黑龙江省高校线上课程教学质量进行评估研究，研究基于模糊层次分析法，利用问卷调查、访谈调查和实地调研等方法，设立了5个二级指标，分别为教学准备、教学资源、教学目标、教学方法、教学效果；建立了16个三级指标，通过层次分析法与模糊综合评价法建立AHP-FCE模型，对黑龙江省线上课程教学质量的指标权重进行确定，探究与评价黑龙江省线上课程教学质量，推动高校教学事业进一步发展，探索创新教学模式，保证线上教学的优质质量。
Taking universities in Heilongjiang Province as the research object, the teaching quality of online courses in colleges and universities in Heilongjiang Province was evaluated and studied, and five secondary indicators were established based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy method, using questionnaire survey, interview survey and field research, namely teaching preparation, teaching resources, teaching objectives, teaching methods, and teaching effects. Sixteen tertiary indicators were established. AHP-FCE model is established through analytic hierarchy method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, the index weight of online course teaching quality in Heilongjiang Province is determined, the teaching quality of online courses in Heilongjiang Province is explored and evaluated, the further development of teaching in colleges and universities is promoted, innovative teaching models are explored, and the quality of online teaching is guaranteed.
| [1] | 许学芬, 徐晓亮. 基于层次分析法的线上课程教学效果研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2022, 38(24): 4283-4286. |
| [2] | 刘宝存, 岑宇. 世界教育数字化转型的动因、趋势及镜鉴[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022, 34(6): 12-23. |
| [3] | 赵巍. 后疫情时代的高校在线教学质量管理[J]. 现代教育管理, 2021(5): 107-112. |
| [4] | 张海霞, 李翠亭, 赵雪虹. 应用型本科院校线上与线下教学融合路径分析——基于智慧教育背景[J]. 金融理论与教学, 2023(2): 90-93+98. |
| [5] | 张月秋. 高校线上教学质量保障体系构建探索与反思[J]. 科技资讯, 2022, 20(18): 188-190. |
| [6] | 鲁小艳. 高校在线教学质量评价体系构建[J]. 中国高等教育, 2021(10): 42-44. |
| [7] | 张莹, 张挺耸, 刘春宇. 混合式教学在大学物理教学中的应用及实践创新——评《基于SPOC的大学物理混合式教学设计》[J]. 科技管理研究, 2022, 42(16): 261. |
| [8] | 李萌欣, 吕建平. 推进高校军事课程线上教学改革的路径探析[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2022(3): 70-72. |
| [9] | 徐娴. 应用型高校线上教学质量评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 科教文汇, 2022(8): 16-19. |
