全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

主体间性视域下跨文化交际写作教学研究
Cross-Cultural Communicative Writing Teaching from the Perspective of Intersubjectivity

DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.116330, PP. 2457-2462

Keywords: 跨文化交际写作,主体间性,教学策略
Cross-Cultural Communicative Writing
, Intersubjectivity, Teaching Strategies

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

英语写作能力作为跨文化交际能力的重要体现,是大学英语教学中重要的能力目标之一。然而,在写作教学实践中,由于师生关系的二元对立,学生和教师面临的跨文化写作挑战和困难不断凸显且亟待解决。主体间性打破师生二元对立关系,为新时期教学改革背景下跨文化交际写作教学提供了理论指导。本文旨在探讨应用型本科院校英语跨文化写作的主体间性,分析学生和教师在跨文化写作中的相互关系,提出改进的教学策略和建议。
As an important manifestation of cross-cultural communication skills, English writing ability is one of the important competences of college students. However, in the practice of writing teaching, due to the dichotomy of teacher-student relationship, the challenges and difficulties of intercultural writing faced by students and teachers are constantly highlighted and need to be solved. Intersubjectivity breaks the dichotomy between teachers and students and provides theoretical guidance for teaching intercultural communicative writing in the context of teaching reform in the new era. The purpose of this paper is to explore the intersubjectivity of English cross-cultural writing in applied undergraduate institutions, analyze the interrelationship between students and teachers in cross-cultural writing, and propose teaching strategies and suggestions for improvement.

References

[1]  孟利魁. 主体间性视阈下大学英语课程教学改革策略探究[J]. 北京教育(高教), 2018(10): 67-69.
[2]  朱彦瑾. 主体间性与规范的正当性——从哈贝马斯到弗斯特[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2018(12): 28-33.
[3]  单文博. 主体间性视域中大学英语“主体互动”教学模式研究[J]. 外语学刊, 2014(5): 113-116.
[4]  Matusov, E. (1996) Intersubjectivity without Agreement. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 25-45.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0301_4
[5]  Duranti, A. (2010) Husserl, Intersubjectivity and Anthropology. Anthropological Theory, 10, 16-35.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499610370517
[6]  Coristine, S., Russo, S., Fitzmorris, R., Beninato, P. and Rivolta, G. (2022) The Importance of Student-Teacher Relationships. Classroom Practice in 2022.
[7]  冯建军. 从主体间性、他者性到公共性——兼论教育中的主体间关系[J]. 南京社会科学, 2016(9): 123-130.
[8]  Ligorio, M.B., Talamo, A. and Pontecorvo, C. (2005) Building Intersubjectivity at a Distance during the Collaborative Writing of Fairytales. Computers & Education, 45, 357-374.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.013
[9]  吴兴明. 文艺研究如何走向主体间性?——主体间性讨论中的越界、含混及其他[J]. 文艺研究, 2009(1): 8-29.
[10]  Gunn, V. (2014) Mimetic Desire and Intersubjectivity in Disciplinary Cultures: Constraints or Enablers to Learning in Higher Education? Studies in Continuing Education, 36, 67-82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2013.787981
[11]  Marvi, K. (2023) Impact of Cultural Diversity in Classrooms of Secondary Schools. Creative Education, 14, 197-211.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.141014
[12]  Smaoui, C. (2021) Second Language Learning as Intersubjectivity. In: Haouioui, F., Ed., The Dynamics of Intersubjectivity, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle.
[13]  骆郁廷. 马克思主义主体性理论的三个维度[J]. 武汉大学学报(人文科学版), 2009, 62(1): 5-10.
[14]  Stahl, G. (2015) Conceptualizing the Intersubjective Group. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 209-217.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9220-4
[15]  Dennen, V., Hall, B.M. and Hedquist, A. (2023) A Systematic Review of Research on Intersubjectivity in Online Learning: Illuminating Opportunities for Cohesion and Mutual Understanding in the Research Conversation. Online Learning, 27, 158-186.
https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3430

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133