全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Caprini和Rogers联合预测模型对妇科恶性肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞筛查的效果评估
Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Prediction Model of Caprini and Rogers in Screening Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tu-mor

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.1361306, PP. 9336-9342

Keywords: 妇科恶性肿瘤,静脉血栓栓塞症,风险评估
Gynecological Malignant Tumor
, VTE, Risk Assessment

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:应用Caprini和Rogers风险评估模型对妇科恶性肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞症(venous thrombo-embolism VTE)的适用性进行评估,以验证其有效性。方法:采用病例对照研究方法,选择病例组与对照组各128人,应用一般描述性研究方法对患者的基本情况进行描述,通过绘制ROC曲线,对风险评估模型的筛查能力进行评价。结果:Caprini模型以9分为临界值时,ROC曲线下面积为0.801,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.727和0.836,约登指数为0.563,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.816和0.754。Rogers模型以10分为临界值时,ROC曲线下面积为0.804,灵敏度和特异度分别为0.695和0.828,约登指数为0.523,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.802和0.731。Caprini与Rogers的联合预测模型,以18.931分为临界值,ROC曲线下面积为0.873,约登指数为0.703,灵敏度、特异度分别为0.844和0.859,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.857和0.846。结论:Caprini和Rogers联合预测模型对妇科恶性肿瘤手术患者静脉血栓栓塞有良好的预测作用,对预防VTE具有积极的指导意义。
Objective: To evaluate the applicability of the Caprini and Rogers risk assessment models for ve-nous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with gynecological malignant tumors and verify their ef-fectiveness. Methods: A case-control study was conducted with 128 patients in the case group and 128 in the control group. The general descriptive study method was used to describe the basic situ-ation of patients. The screening ability of the risk assessment model was evaluated by drawing ROC curve. Results: When the critical value of the Caprini model was 9 points, the area under the ROC curve was 0.801, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.727 and 0.836, and the Youden index was 0.563, the positive and negative predictive values were 0.816 and 0.754 respectively. When the critical value of the Rogers model was 10 points, the area under the ROC curve was 0.804, the sensi-tivity and specificity was 0.695 and 0.828, the Youden Index was 0.523, and the positive and nega-tive predictive values were 0.802 and 0.731, respectively. The joint prediction model of Caprini and Rogers took 18.931 as the critical value. The area under ROC curve is 0.873, the Youden index was 0.703, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.844 and 0.859 respectively, and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 0.857 and 0.846 respectively. Conclusion: The combined prediction model of Caprini and Rogers has a good predictive effect on venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gynecological malignant tumor surgery, and has a positive guiding significance for preventing VTE.

References

[1]  Wang, L., Wei, S., Zhou, B. and Wu, S. (2021) A Nomogram Model to Predict the Venous Thromboembolism Risk after Surgery in Patients with Gynecological Tumors. Thrombosis Research, 202, 52-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.02.035
[2]  谢幸, 沈源明. 妇科肿瘤的防治现状与面临的挑战[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2020, 36(1): 20-22.
[3]  Zhan, C. and Miller, M.R. (2003) Excess Length of Stay, Charges and Mortality Attributable to Medical Injuries during Hospitalization. JAMA, 290, 1868-1874.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.14.1868
[4]  Barber, E.L. and Clarke-Pearson, D.L. (2017) Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Gynecologic Oncology Surgery. Gynecologic Oncology, 144, 420-427.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.036
[5]  Cantrell, L.A., Garcia, C. and Maitland, H.S. (2018) Thrombosis and Thromboprophylaxis in Gynecology Surgery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 61, 269-277.
https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000355
[6]  Caprini, J.A., Arcelus, J.I., Hasty, J.H., Tamhane, A.C. and Fabrega, F. (1991) Clinical Assessment of Venous Thromboembolic Risk in Surgical Patients. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 17, 304-312.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1002635
[7]  Rogers Jr., S.O., Kilaru, R.K., Hosokawa, P., Henderson, W.G., Zinner, M.J. and Khuri, S.F. (2007) Multivariable Predictors of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolic Events after General and Vascular Surgery: Results from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 204, 1211-1221.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.072
[8]  Saleh, J., El-Othmani, M.M. and Saleh, K.J. (2017) Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism Considerations in Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 48, 127-135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2016.12.003
[9]  焦庆丰, 鲁梅丽, 潘迎春, 何院玲, 杨晓帆. 床旁彩超联合凝血-纤溶标志物对ICU患者下肢DVT的诊断评价[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2022, 40(5): 1128-1132.
[10]  Wagner, B.E., Langstraat, C.L., McGree, M.E., et al. (2019) Beyond Prophylaxis: Extended Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Primary Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 152, 286-292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.021
[11]  Str?m Kahr, H., Christiansen, O.B., Riddersholm, J.S., et al. (2021) The Timing of Venous Thromboembolism in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 19, 992-1000.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15235
[12]  张宇. Padua量表的改良及预防性干预对肺癌患者下肢静脉血栓的应用效果研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东第一医科大学, 2019.
[13]  张家怡, 张玉泉. 妇产科患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估模型的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(1): 15-22.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133