This work presents a comprehensive second-order predictive modeling (PM)
methodology based on the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) principle for obtaining
best-estimate mean values and correlations for model responses and parameters.
This methodology is designated by the acronym 2nd-BERRU-PMP, where the attribute “2nd” indicates
that this methodology incorporates second-order uncertainties
(means and covariances) and second (and higher) order sensitivities of computed
model responses to model parameters. The acronym BERRU stands for
“Best-Estimate Results with Reduced Uncertainties” and the last letter (“P”)
in the acronym indicates “probabilistic,” referring to the MaxEnt probabilistic
inclusion of the computational model responses. This is in contradistinction to
the 2nd-BERRU-PMD methodology, which deterministically combines the computed model responses with the experimental information, as
presented in the accompanying work (Part I). Although both the 2nd-BERRU-PMP and the 2nd-BERRU-PMD methodologies yield expressions that
include second (and higher) order sensitivities of responses to model
parameters, the respective expressions for the predicted responses, for the
calibrated predicted parameters and for their predicted uncertainties
(covariances), are not identical to each other. Nevertheless, the results
predicted by both the 2nd-BERRU-PMP and the 2nd-BERRU-PMD methodologies encompass, as particular cases, the results produced by the
extant data assimilation and data adjustment procedures, which rely on the
minimization, in a least-square sense, of a user-defined functional meant to
represent the discrepancies between measured and computed model responses.
References
[1]
Cacuci, D.G. (2023) Second-Order MaxEnt Predictive Modeling Methodology. I: Deterministically Incorporated Computational Model Responses (2nd-BERRU-PMD). American Journal of Computational Mathematics.
[2]
Jaynes, E.T. (1957) Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. Physical Review Journals Archive, 106, 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
[3]
Lewis, J.M., Lakshmivarahan, S. and Dhall, S.K. (2006) Dynamic Data Assimilation: A Least Square Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526480
[4]
Cacuci, D.G., Navon, M.I. and Ionescu-Bujor, M. (2014) Computational Methods for Data Evaluation and Assimilation. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
[5]
Rowlands, J., et al. (1973) The Production and Performance of the Adjusted Cross-Section Set FGL5. Proceeding of International Symposium on Physics of Fast Reactors, Tokio. http://www.cern.ch/root
[6]
Gandini, A. and Petilli, M. (1973) A Code Using the Lagrange’s Multipliers Method for Nuclear Data Adjustment. CNEN-RT/FI(73)39, Comitato Nazionale Energia Nucleare, Rome.
[7]
Kuroi, H. and Mitani, H. (1975) Adjustment to Cross-Section Data to Fit Integral Experiments by Least Squares Method. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 12, 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1975.9733172
[8]
Dragt, J.B., Dekker, J.W.M., Gruppelaar, H. and Janssen, A.J. (1977) Methods of Adjustment and Error Evaluation of Neutron Capture Cross Sections. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 62, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE77-3
[9]
Barhen, J., Cacuci, D.G., Wagschal, J.J., Bjerke, M.A. and Mullins, C.B. (1982) Uncertainty Analysis of Time-Dependent Nonlinear Systems: Theory and Application to Transient Thermal Hydraulics. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 81, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-3
[10]
Cacuci, D.G. (2014) Predictive Modeling of Coupled Multi-Physics Systems: I. Theory. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 70, 266-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.11.027.
Cacuci, D.G. (2023) Perspective on Predictive Modeling: Current Status, New High-Order Methodology and Outlook for Energy Systems. Energies, 16, Article 933. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020933
Cacuci, D.G. (2022) The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology for Nonlinear Systems (nth-CASAM-N): Mathematical Framework. Journal of Nuclear Engineering, 3, 163-190. https://doi.org/10.3390/jne3030010
[15]
Cacuci, D.G. (2022) The nth-Order Comprehensive Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Methodology: Overcoming the Curse of Dimensionality. Volume I: Linear Systems. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96364-4
[16]
Tukey, J.W. (1957) The Propagation of Errors, Fluctuations and Tolerances. Technical Reports No. 10-12, Princeton University, Princeton.
[17]
Shun, Z. and McCullagh. P. (1995) Laplace Approximation of High Dimensional Integrals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57, 749-760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02060.x
[18]
Tang, Y. and Reid, N. (2021) Laplace and Saddle Point Approximations in High Dimensions. arXiv: 2107.1088.
[19]
Shannon, C.E. (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x