全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Dilemma and Solution of the Multilateral Legal Framework of International Taxation

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2023.142042, PP. 783-797

Keywords: Base Erosion and Profit Transfer, BEPS Convention, Benefit Principle, Tax on Positive Income in Residential Areas, Tax on Negative Income in Source Areas

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To avoid double taxation is the basic purpose of the current international tax system. Therefore, an international tax system with bilateral tax treaties as the main form has been formed among states. However, practice has proved that the inherent defects of the international tax system, which is dominated by bilateral tax treaties, have resulted in the problems of tax base erosion and profit transfer. G20 and OECD have led the introduction of Multilateral Convention on the Implementation of Relevant Measures of Tax Treaties to Prevent Tax Base Erosion and Profit Transfer (hereinafter referred to as “BEPS Convention”), to which China has also acceded. However, the above BEPS convention is called “Convention”. In fact, it is only a modification of some provisions of existing bilateral tax treaties of various countries. In essence, it does not have the function of multilateral tax treaty, but only takes the form of multilateral agreements for the continuation of bilateral tax treaties. The author thinks that in order to solve the problems of tax base erosion and profit transfer, we should change the structure of tax benefit distribution under the traditional benefit principle that “tax on positive income in source areas and tax on negative income in residential areas” and build a new multilateral tax treaty system that “tax on positive income in residential areas and tax on negative income in source areas”.

References

[1]  Avi-Yonah, R. S. (2008). International Tax as International Law—An Analysis of the International Tax Regime (Translated by Xiong Wei, pp. 4-8). Law Press China.
[2]  Dagen, T. (1999-2000). The Tax Treatises Myths. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 32, 939.
[3]  Doyle, V. (2018). Tax Treaties and Developing Countries (Translated by Xiong Wei, p. 14). The Commercial Press.
[4]  Editorial Board (2012). Application Manual of Tax Treaties (pp. 585-591). China Taxation Publishing House.
[5]  Higher Education Press (2016). Editing Group of Science of International Economic Law: Science of International Economic Law (pp. 428-430).
[6]  Liu, Y. W. (2013). Science of International Tax Law (3rd ed., pp. 35-43, 49-51). Peking University Press.
[7]  Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2016). Final Report of Results in 2015 of OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project (I) (pp. 7, 53, 63, 77, Translated by International Taxation Department, State Taxation Administration). China Taxation Publishing House.
[8]  State Taxation Administration of the People’s Republic of China (2020). Explanation of Multilateral Convention on the Implementation of Relevant Measures of Tax Treaties to Prevent Tax Base Erosion and Profit Transfer (Chinese Edition). Website of State Taxation Administration.
http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/chinatax/n810341/n810770/index.html
[9]  Xu, H. Y. (2019). Multilateralism in International Tax Law Reform: Review of BEPS Package Plans of OECD/G20. Business and Economic Law Review, No. 4, 59-78.
[10]  Zhang, Z. Y. (2020a). Digital Services Tax: Legitimate Tax or Barrier of Service Trade. International Taxation in China, No. 4, 28-35.
[11]  Zhang, Z. Y. (2020b). The Recent Development of International Tax Rules: Review, Analysis and Prospect. International Taxation in China, No. 1, 3-9.
[12]  Zhu, W. Q., & Li, Q. (2008). International Treaties Law (p. 33). China Renmin University Press.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133