|
居住权排除强制执行的问题研究
|
Abstract:
我国《民法典》首次将居住权规定为一种法定用益物权,这对于解决部分群体的住房需求、维系社会稳定具有重大意义。然而,作为一种新型用益物权,居住权制度的相关法律规定较少,在与不动产执行的衔接方面也存在着一些问题。因此,需要在坚持利益衡量理论的前提下,借助租赁权排除强制执行的程序,完善居住权的审查标准并对恶意设定居住权排除强制执行的行为予以规制,以期最大程度地发挥居住权的效益。
China’s Civil Code stipulates the right of residence as a legal usufructuary right for the first time, which is of great significance to solve the housing needs of some groups and maintain social stability. However, as a new type of usufructuary right, the system of residence right will have the connection problem with the implementation of real estate. Because there are few relevant laws and regulations, it is necessary to use the procedure of excluding enforcement of lease right, improve the review procedure of residence right and regulate the malicious setting of enforcement on the premise of adhering to the theory of interest measurement, so as to give full play to the benefits of residence right to the greatest extent.
[1] | 黄薇. 中华人民共和国民法典物权编解读[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2020: 541-542. |
[2] | 王利明. 论民法典物权编中居住权的若干问题[J]. 学术月刊, 2019(7): 91-100. |
[3] | 孙宪忠. 从人民法院司法的角度谈解读和实施《民法典》的几个问题[J]. 法律适用, 2021(15): 18-38. |
[4] | 汤维建, 陈爱飞. 足以排除强制执行民事权益的类型化分析[J]. 苏州大学学报, 2018(2): 54-63. |
[5] | 谷佳杰. 民法典的实施与民事强制执行法的协调和衔接[J]. 河北法学, 2021(10): 20-37. |
[6] | 汪洋. 民法典意定居住权与居住权合同解释论[J]. 比较法研究, 2020(6): 105-119. |
[7] | 梁慧星. 裁判的方法[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 186-187. |
[8] | 杨仁寿. 法学方法论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1999: 175-176. |
[9] | 唐力. 案外人执行异议之诉的完善[J]. 法学, 2014(7): 141-151. |
[10] | 崔建远. 物权法[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2011: 266. |
[11] | 陈明灿. 从博弈到共存: 执行程序中租赁权的保护范围及限度——以善意执行视角下利益衡量论为视角[J]. 法律适用, 2020(21): 94-104. |