全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Indigenous Research Methodologies: Challenges and Opportunities for Broader Recognition and Acceptance

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2023.115030, PP. 467-500

Keywords: Indigenous Methodologies, Indigenous, Native, Epistemology, Research, Worldview

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The Western scientific worldview is assumed to be universally applicable, including to research involving peoples with different worldviews. Even in the social sciences, which should be more aware of and open to diverse ontologies, epistemologies, and axiologies, Western science is privileged and reproduced and other ways of knowing are dismissed, denigrated, or otherwise treated as inferior. In particular, the use of culturally inappropriate data collection, analysis, and reporting processes has contributed to an increasingly contentious relationship with Indigenous peoples. Indigenous student and faculty researchers understandably experience both internal and external conflict when trying to perform Indigenous research in a way that respects Indigenous cultural expectations while also satisfying the requirements of Western gatekeepers. Indigenous research methodologies reflect the Indigenous worldview and provide an important alternative to the dominant positivist/ postpositivist paradigm of Western science to produce research that is by, with, and for Indigenous peoples. Indigenous methodologies approach community and cultural protocols, values, and needs as an integral part of research, and they emphasize common principles of respect, reciprocity, relevance, and responsibility. We believe broader recognition and acceptance of Indigenous methodologies would benefit all stakeholders, and, in furtherance of that goal, we identify structural, ideological, process-related, and results-related challenges and opportunities that should be considered as Indigenous methodologies are developed and employed.

References

[1]  Absolon, K. E. (2011). Kaandossiwin: How We Come to Know. Fernwood.
[2]  Allen, P. G. (1998). Special Problems in Teaching Leslie Marmon Silko’s Ceremony. In D. A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and Academics: Researching and Writing about American Indians (pp. 55-64). University of Nebraska Press.
[3]  Atkinson, P., & Ryen, A. (2016). Indigenous Research and Romantic Nationalism. Societies, 6, Article No. 34.
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6040034
[4]  Bardill, J., Bader, A. C., & Garrison, N. A., Bolnick, D. A., Raff, J. A., Walker, A., Malhi, R. S., & The Summer Internship for Indigenous Peoples in Genomics (SING) Consortium (2018). Advancing the Ethics of Paleogenomics. Science, 360, 384-385.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1131
[5]  Battiste, M., & Henderson, J. Y. (2000). Protecting Indigenous Knowledge and Heritage: A Global Challenge. Purich.
[6]  Botha, L. (2011). Mixing Methods as a Process towards Indigenous Methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 313-325.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.516644
[7]  Brayboy, B. M. J. (2018). Forward. In R. S. Minthorn, & H. J. Shotton (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education (pp. 9-12). Rutgers University Press.
https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813588728-001
[8]  Castellano, M. B. (2000). Updating Aboriginal Traditions of Knowledge. In G. J. S. Dei, B. L. Hall, & D. G. Rosenberg (Eds.), Indigenous Knowledges in Global Contexts: Multiple Readings of Our World (pp. 21-36). University of Toronto Press.
[9]  Castellano, M. B. (2014). Ethics of Aboriginal Research. In W. Teays, J-S. Gordon, & A. D. Renteln (Eds.), Global Bioethics and Human Rights: Contemporary Issues (pp. 273-288). Rowman & Littlefield.
[10]  Champagne, D. (2015). Centering Indigenous Nations within Indigenous Methodologies. Wicazo Sa Review, 30, 57-81.
https://doi.org/10.5749/wicazosareview.30.1.0057
[11]  Chilisa, B. (2020). Indigenous Research Methodologies. SAGE.
[12]  Clifton, J. A. (1990). Introduction: Memoir, Exegesis. In J. A. Clifton (Ed.), The Invented Indian: Cultural Fictions and Government Policies (pp. 1-28). Transaction.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315132747-1
[13]  Coombes, J., & Ryder, C. (2020). Walking Together to Create Harmony in Research: A Murri Woman’s Approach to Indigenous Research Methodology. Qualitative Research in Organization Management, 15, 58-67.
https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2018-1657
[14]  Davidson, C., Shotton, H. J., Minthorn, R. S., & Waterman, S. (2018). The Need for Indigenizing Research in Higher Education Scholarship. In R. S. Minthorn, & H. J. Shotton (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education (pp. 7-18). Rutgers University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1v2xw7v.5
[15]  Davis, L., Gaywish, R., & VanEvery-Albert, C. (2008). Indigenous Methodologies. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 31, 9-10.
[16]  Deloria, V. (1991). Commentary: Research, Redskins, and Reality. American Indian Quarterly, 15, 457-468.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1185364
[17]  Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008a). Preface. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 9-15). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686
[18]  Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008b). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 1-30). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n1
[19]  Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686
[20]  Dickert, N., & Sugarman, J. (2005). Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1123-1127.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.058933
[21]  Dodson, M., & Williamson, R. (1999). Indigenous Peoples and the Morality of the Human Genome Diversity Project. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 204-208.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.2.204
[22]  Drawson, A. S., Toombs, E., & Mushquash, C. J. (2017). Indigenous Research Methods: A Systematic Review. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.5
[23]  Dunbar, T., & Scrimgeour, M. (2006). Ethics in Indigenous Research-Connecting with Community. Bioethical Inquiry, 3, 179-185.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-006-9018-1
[24]  Edwards, R., Moewaka Barnes, H., McGregor, D., & Brannelly, T. (2020). Supporting Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Research Partnerships. The Qualitative Report, 25, 6-15.
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4754
[25]  Faye, J. (2001). Subverting the Captor’s Language: Teaching Native Science to Students of Western Science. American Indian Quarterly, 25, 270-273.
https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2001.0019
[26]  Gaudry, A. J. P. (2011). Insurgent Research. Wicazo Sa Review, 26, 113-136.
https://doi.org/10.1353/wic.2011.0006
[27]  Gone, J. P. (2017). “It Felt like Violence”: Indigenous Knowledge Traditions and the Postcolonial Ethics of Academic Inquiry and Community Engagement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60, 353-360.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12183
[28]  Gone, J. P. (2019). Considering Indigenous Research Methodologies: Critical Reflections by an Indigenous Knower. Qualitative Inquiry, 25, 45-56.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418787545
[29]  Harrington, C. F., & Hunt, B. (2010). The Impending Education Crisis for American Indians: Higher Education at the Crossroads. Indigenous Policy Journal, 21, 1-13.
[30]  Hudson, M., Garrison, N. A., Sterlng, R. et al. (2020). Rights, Interests and Expectations: Indigenous Perspectives on Unrestricted Access to Genomic Data. Nature Reviews Genetics, 21, 377-384.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x
[31]  Juutilainen, S. A., Jeffrey, M., & Stewart, S. (2019). Methodology Matters: Designing a Pilot Study Guided by Indigenous Epistemologies. Human Biology, 91, 141-151.
https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.91.3.06
[32]  Keene, A. (2018). Understanding Relationship in the College Process: Indigenous Methodologies, Reciprocity, and College Horizon Students. In R. S. Minthorn, & H. J. Shotton (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education (pp. 47-63). Rutgers University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1v2xw7v.8
[33]  Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on Gender and Science. Yale University Press.
[34]  Kirkness, V. J., & Barnhardt, R. (1991). First Nations and Higher Education: The Four R’s—Respect Relevance, Reciprocity, Responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30, 1-15.
[35]  Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6, 26-41.
https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
[36]  Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous Methodologies, Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. University of Toronto Press.
[37]  Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (2016). Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current Practice and Future Needs. In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda (pp. 1-18). ANU Press.
https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
[38]  Lamsam, T. T. (2014). A Cultural Contracts Perspective: Examining American Indian Identity Negotiations. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 21, 29-35.
[39]  Louis, R. P. (2007). Can You Hear Us Now? Voices from the Margin: Using Indigenous Methodologies in Geographic Research. Geographical Research, 45, 130-139.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x
[40]  Lowery, C. T. (1997). Hearing the Messages: Integrating Pueblo Philosophy into Academic Life. Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 36, 1-8.
[41]  MacDonald, K. (2017). My Experiences with Indigenist Methodologies. Geographical Research, 55, 369-378.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12241
[42]  Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research Dilemmas: Paradigms, Methods and Methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16, 193-205.
[43]  Malhi, R. (2019). Community-Oriented Research and the Future of Anthropological Genetics. In D. H. O’Rourke (Ed.), A Companion to Anthropological Genetics (pp. 57-64). John Wiley & Sons.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118768853.ch3
[44]  Marker, M. (2004). Theories and Disciplines as Sites of Struggle: The Reproduction of Colonial Dominance through the Controlling of Knowledge in the Academy. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 28, 102-110.
[45]  Meyer, M. A. (1998). Native Hawaiian Epistemology: Contemporary Narratives (Publication No. 9830067) [Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University]. Proquest.
[46]  Meyer, M. A. (2001). Acultural Assumptions of Empiricism: A Native Hawaiian Critique. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25, 188-198.
[47]  Mihesuah, D. A. (1998). Native and Academics: Researching and Writing about American Indians. University of Nebraska Press.
[48]  Morgan, D. L. (2003). Appropriation, Appreciation, Accommodation: Indigenous Wisdoms and Knowledges in Higher Education. International Review of Education, 49, 35-49.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022937003545
[49]  Morgensen, S. L. (2012). Destabilizing the Settler Academy: The Decolonial Effects of Indigenous Methodologies. American Quarterly, 64, 805-808.
https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0050
[50]  Nakagawa, S. (2017). Indigenous Research Methodology and the Indigenous Academic. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 37, 95-115.
[51]  Nakamura, N. (2010). Indigenous Methodologies: Suggestions for Junior Researchers. Geographical Research, 48, 97-103.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00625.x
[52]  National Congress of American Indians (2019). Resolution #ABQ-19-061. NCAI.
https://www.ncai.org/ABQ-19-061.pdf
[53]  Olsen, T. A. (2017). Gender and Indigenous Methodologies: On Trouble and Harmony in Indigenous Studies. Ethnicities, 17, 509-525.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796816673089
[54]  Ormiston, N. T. (2010). Re-Conceptualizing Research: An Indigenous Perspective. First People’s Child and Family Review, 5, 50-56.
https://doi.org/10.7202/1069061ar
[55]  Peltier, C. (2018). An Application of Two-Eyed Seeing: Indigenous Research Methods with Participatory Action Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918812346
[56]  Pe-Pua, R. (1989). Pagtatanong-Tanong: A Cross-Cultural Research Method. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13, 147-163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(89)90003-5
[57]  Pidgeon, M. (2018). Moving between Theory and Practice within an Indigenous Research Paradigm. Qualitative Research, 19, 418-436.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118781380
[58]  Rigney, L.-I. (1999). Internationalization of an Indigenous Anticolonial Cultural Critique of Research Methodologies: A Guide to Indigenist Research Methodology and Its Principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14, 109-121.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1409555
[59]  Romm, N. R. A. (2015). Reviewing the Transformative Paradigm: A Critical Systemic and Relational (Indigenous) Lens. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 28, 411-427.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9344-5
[60]  Rydera, C., Mackeana, T., Coombsa, J., Williams, H., Huntera, K., Hollande, A. J. A., & Iversa, R. Q. (2020). Indigenous Research Methodology-Weaving a Research Interface. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 23, 255-267.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1669923
[61]  Semali, L. M., & Kincheloe, J. L. (1999). Introduction: What Is Indigenous Knowledge and Why Should We Study It. In L. M. Semali, & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), What Is Indigenous Knowledge? Voices from the Academy (pp. 3-57). Falmer Press.
[62]  Shipley, G. P., & Williams, D. H. (2019). Limitations of the Western Scientific Worldview for the Study of Metaphysically Inclusive Peoples. Open Journal of Philosophy, 9, 295-317.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2019.93020
[63]  Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350225282
[64]  Smith, L. T. (2021). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
[65]  Snipp, C. M. (2016). What Does Data Sovereignty Imply: What Does It Look like? In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda (pp. 39-56). ANU Press.
https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.03
[66]  Solot, D., & Arluke, A. (1997). Learning the Scientist’s Role: Animal Dissection in Middle School. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 26, 28-54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/089124197026001002
[67]  Steinhauer, E. (2002). Thoughts on an Indigenous Research Methodology. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26, 69-81.
[68]  Stiffarm, L. A. (1998). As We See: Aboriginal Pedagogy. University Extension Press.
[69]  Swadener, B. B., & Mutua, K. (2008). Decolonizing Performances: Deconstructing the Global Postcolonial. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 31-43). Sage.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385686.n2
[70]  Talbot, S. (2002). Academic Indianismo: Social Scientific Research in American Indian Studies. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 26, 67-96.
https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.26.4.j3w2317170370937
[71]  Thayer-Bacon, B. (2010). A Pragmatist and Feminist Relational (E)pistemology. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2, 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.948
[72]  Thomas, A., & Spang Gion, S. (2021). Nation Building in STEM through Relationships, Education, and Research. Journal of American Indian Education, 60, 72-94.
[73]  Toombs, M. (2016). The Intersection between Research and Ethics, as It Applies to Indigenous Methodologies. Aboriginal & Islander Health Worker Journal, 40, 8-10.
[74]  Tsosie, K. S., Yracheta, J. M., Kolopenuk, J. A., & Geary, J. (2021). We Have “Gifted” Enough: Indigenous Genomic Data Sovereignty in Precision Medicine. American Journal of Bioethics, 21, 72-75.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1891347
[75]  Urion, C., Norton, R., & Porter, T. (1995). Roundtable Discussion #1: Carl Urion, Ruth Norton, and Tom Porter. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 21, 55-60.
[76]  Wade, L. (2018). To Overcome Decades of Mistrust, a Workshop Aims to Train Indigenous Researchers to Be Their Own Genome Experts. Science.
https://www-science-org.www2.lib.ku.edu/content/article/overcome-decades-mistrust-workshop-aims-train-indigenous-researchers-be-their-own
[77]  Walter, M. (2005). Using the “Power of the Data” in Indigenous Research. Australian Aboriginal Studies, 2005, 27-33.
https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.05
[78]  Walter, M. (2016). Data Politics and Indigenous Representation in Australian Statistics. In T. Kukutai, & J. Taylor (Eds.), Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Towards an Agenda (pp. 79-98). ANU Press.
[79]  Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Methodology. Routledge.
[80]  Walter, M., & Suina, M. (2019). Indigenous Data, Indigenous Methodologies and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22, 233-243.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1531228
[81]  Warrior, R. A. (1995). Tribal Secrets: Recovering American Indian Intellectual Traditions. University of Minnesota Press.
[82]  Waters, A. (2004). Language Matters: Nondiscrete Nonbinary Dualism. In A. Waters (Ed.), American Indian Thought: Philosophical Essays (pp. 97-115). Blackwell.
[83]  Weber-Pilwax, C. (2001). What Is Indigenous Research? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25, 166-174.
[84]  Williams, D. H., & Shipley, G. P. (2018). Cultural Taboos as a Factor in the Participation Rate of Native Americans in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article No. 17.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0114-7
[85]  Williams, D. H., & Shipley, G. P. (2020). Scientific Consequentialism: Potential Problems with an Outcome-Driven Form of Indigenous Archaeology. Archaeological Discovery, 8, 63-83.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ad.2020.81004
[86]  Williams, R. (1999). Cultural Safety—What Does It Mean for Our Work Practice? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23, 213-214.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1999.tb01240.x
[87]  Wilson, S. (2001). What Is an Indigenous Research Methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25, 175-179.
[88]  Wilson, S. (2008). Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing.
[89]  Wilson, S. (2013). Using Indigenist Research to Shape Our Future. In M. Gray, J. Coates, M. Yellow Bird, & T. Hetherington (Eds.), Decolonizing Social Work (pp. 311-322). Ashgate
[90]  Windchief, S. (2018). Stealing Horses: Indigenous Student Metaphors for Success in Graduate Education. In R. S. Minthorn, & H. J. Shotton (Eds.), Reclaiming Indigenous Research in Higher Education (pp. 76-87). Rutgers University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1v2xw7v.10
[91]  Windchief, S., & Cummins, J. (2022). Considering Indigenous Research Methodologies: Bicultural Accountability and the Protection of Community Held Knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 28, 151-163.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211021803
[92]  Windchief, S., Polacek, C., Munson, M., Ulrich, M., & Cummins, J. D. (2018). In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 532-542.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417743527
[93]  Woods, J. C. (2009). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (Review). Collaborative Anthropologies, 2, 228-232.
https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.0.0024
[94]  Wulff, D. (2010). Unquestioned Answers: A Review of Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. The Qualitative Report, 15, 1290-1295.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133