从《申辩篇》中分析雅典城邦民主对现代民主的启示
The Enlightenment of Athenian Democracy to Modern Democracy from “The Apology”

古希腊最具影响力的哲学家苏格拉底在法庭上的申辩，揭露出希腊城邦民主的弊端。将一个哲学家的命运，交由一群无知的民众来决定，以此来彰显希腊的民主和公正，注定了这场申辩必将会以悲剧收场。《申辩篇》记录了苏格拉底在法庭上为自己辩护但最终仍被判罪的全部过程。这篇文稿中包含着他对标榜着自由与民主的雅典城邦民主体制的批判，本文希望通过对《申辩篇》的分析，来找出雅典城邦民主体制中存在的缺陷，以期为我国当前民主制度的建设和完善提供一定的参考。
Socrates, the most influential philosopher of ancient Greece, whose pleas in court revealed the flaws of Greek city-state democracy: A group of ignorant people to determine the fate of a philo-sopher, in order to demonstrate the Greek democracy and justice, which is doomed to failure. “The Apology” records the entire process by which Socrates defended himself in court but was eventually convicted. This text contains his criticism of the democratic system of Athens, which boasted freedom and democracy. The paper hopes to find out the flaws in the Athenian city-state democratic system through the analysis of “The Apology”, and to provide some reference for the construction and improvement of our country’s current democratic system.