|
|
安全依恋启动对大学生人际信任的影响
|
Abstract:
目的：探究安全依恋启动是否能影响大学生的人际信任水平。方法：通过回忆书写任务将48名大学生随机分为安全依恋启动组和中性启动组，随后进行信任博弈游戏。结果：相对于中性启动，安全依恋启动能显著提高大学生在信任博弈游戏中对他人的人际信任行为(投资额)和信任评价。结论：安全依恋启动能有效提高大学生的人际信任水平，这为促进大学生的人际信任和合作行为提供了有效借鉴。
Objective: To explore whether the initiation of secure attachment can affect the interpersonal trust level of college students. Methods: A total of 48 college students were randomly divided into safe attachment initiation group and neutral initiation group by recalling the writing task, followed by a trust game. Results: Compared with neutral initiation, secure attachment initiation can significantly improve the interpersonal trust behavior (investment amount) and trust evaluation of others in the trust game of college students. Conclusion: Secure attachment initiation can effectively improve the interpersonal trust level of college students, which provides an effective reference for promoting interpersonal trust and cooperative behavior of college students.
| [1] | 郭薇, 陈旭, 杨楠(2011). 安全基地启动及其脑机制. 心理发展与教育, 27(5), 553-560. |
| [2] | 李彩娜, 石鑫欣, 黄凤, 等(2013). 安全依恋的概念、机制与功能. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 30-37. |
| [3] | 李彩娜, 孙颖, 拓瑞, 等(2016). 安全依恋对人际信任的影响: 依恋焦虑的调节效应. 心理学报, 48(8), 989-1001. |
| [4] | 李爽, 郭治斌, 韩尚锋, 等(2021). 死亡凸显对大学生人际信任的影响: 个人控制感的中介作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 29(1), 128-132. |
| [5] | 李伊伦(2019). 大学生依恋质量及其对合作行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津职业技术师范大学. |
| [6] | 潘彦谷, 张大均, 何龙韬, 等(2021). 父母的依恋风格与初中生的心理素质: 亲子依恋的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(2), 217-223. |
| [7] | 孙嘉秀, 何赟, 马皑(2020). 成人依恋对关系满意度的影响: 拒绝敏感性与关系真实性的链式中介. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(6), 1226-1229+1234. |
| [8] | 拓瑞(2014). 安全依恋对人际信任的影响. 硕士学位论文, 西安: 陕西师范大学. |
| [9] | 王燕(2020). 大学生人际信任度研究综述. 长江丛刊, (18), 104-105. |
| [10] | 王争艳, 刘迎泽, 杨叶(2005). 依恋内部工作模式的研究概述及探讨. 心理科学进展, (5), 629-639. |
| [11] | 袁悦(2019). 安全依恋启动对大学生探索行为的影响. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西师范大学. |
| [12] | Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027 |
| [13] | Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Attachment. Penguin. |
| [14] | Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss (Vol. 2): Separation. Basic Books. |
| [15] | Bowlby, J. (2008). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books. |
| [16] | Feeney, B. C., & Collies, N. L. (2001). Predictors of Caregiving in Adult Intimate Relationships: An Attachment Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 972-994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.972 |
| [17] | Gillath, O., Sesko, A. K., Shaver, P. R., & Chun, D. S. (2010). Attachment, Authenticity, and Honesty: Dispositional and Experimentally Induced Security Can Reduce Self- and Other-Deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 841-855. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019206 |
| [18] | Li, C. N., Liu, J., Zhang, S. P., Huo, Y. Q., You, J., & Wang, K. (2016). Effects of Dispositional and Temporarily Primed Attachment Security on Response Inhibition Following Ego-Depletion among Chinese College Students. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.092 |
| [19] | Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2001). Attachment Theory and Intergroup Bias: Evidence That Priming the Secure Base Schema Attenuates Negative Reactions to Out-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 97-115.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.97 |
| [20] | Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Rom, E. (2011). The Effects of Implicit and Explicit Security Priming on Creative Problem Solving. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 519-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540110 |
| [21] | Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P., Gillath, O., & Nitzberg, R. A. (2005). Attachment, Caregiving, and Altruism: Boosting Attachment Security Increases Compassion and Helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 817-839.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.817 |
| [22] | Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Brehm, S. S. (2009). Intimate Relationships. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. |
| [23] | Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 |
