|
论虚假诉讼罪中的“捏造的事实”
|
Abstract:
虚假诉讼罪的法益为司法秩序,对他人合法权益的侵害应当作为影响量刑的因素予以考虑,对“捏造的事实”的解释应以司法秩序为指导。“捏造的事实”必须首先是一种事实,捏造的主体不限于提起诉讼的人,其核心内容必须是构成虚假诉讼标的的客观事实。以“捏造的事实”为标准,可将“部分篡改型虚假诉讼”行为划分为真正的“部分篡改型虚假诉讼”行为与不真正的“部分篡改型虚假诉讼”行为,前者以虚假诉讼罪进行规制,后者则诉诸于《民事诉讼法》以及涉证据类犯罪。
The legal interest of the crime of false litigation is judicial order, and the infringement of the legiti-mate rights and interests of others should be considered as a factor affecting the sentencing, and the interpretation of “fabricated facts” should be guided by judicial order. The “fabricated fact” must first be a fact. The subject of the fabricated fact is not limited to the person who brings the lawsuit. Its core content must be the objective fact that constitutes the subject of the false lawsuit. Based on the standard of “fabricated facts”, the behavior of “partial tampering false litigation” can be divided into the real behavior of “partial tampering false litigation” and the unreal behavior of “partial tampering false litigation”. The former is regulated by the crime of false litigation, while the latter is resorted to the civil procedure law and crimes involving evidence.
[1] | 张明楷. 虚假诉讼罪的基本问题[J]. 法学, 2017(1): 152-168. |
[2] | 陈洪兵. 准确解读虚假诉讼罪的构成要件[J]. 法治研究, 2020(4): 152-160. |
[3] | 苏永生. 虚假诉讼罪的“严重侵害他人合法权益”——从定罪条件到注意规定[J]. 法学杂志, 2019, 40(7): 65-72. |
[4] | 张明楷. 中华人民共和国刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 84 |
[5] | 张卫平. 中国第三人撤销之诉的制度构成与适用[J]. 中外法学, 2013, 25(1): 170-184. |
[6] | 李想. “部分篡改型”行为构成虚假诉讼罪之否定[J]. 六盘水师范学院学报, 2021, 33(6): 56-64. |
[7] | 汪千力, 童德华. “部分篡改型”行为成立虚假诉讼罪的理论证成[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 37(1): 58-64. |
[8] | 周峰, 汪斌, 李加玺. 《关于办理虚假诉讼刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J]. 人民司法, 2019(4): 30-35. |
[9] | 翟姝影, 郝银钟. 虚假诉讼罪的司法难题与对策研究[J]. 法律适用, 2022(9): 29-41. |
[10] | 缐杰, 吴峤滨. 关于办理虚假诉讼刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释重点难点问题解读[N]. 检察日报, 2018-09-27(4). |
[11] | 杨智博. 论虚假诉讼罪中的“捏造事实” [J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2019, 32(4): 49-56. |