“投资者–国家”争议解决机制改革趋势及中国方案
Review of the Trend of “Investor-State” Dispute Resolution Mechanism Reform and China’s Solution

由于各国自在国际投资活动和争端解决中的利益诉求有所不同，以及当前“投资者–国家”争议解决机制逐渐显露的一些制度上的局限性，不同国家间在该争议解决机制改革方面产生了较为明显的分歧。当前“投资者–国家”争议解决机制改革的趋势主要有渐进性的投资仲裁改革模式、欧盟司法化的投资法庭模式两种改革类型。分析当前争议机制改革的趋势有助于中国构建多元化的投资争端解决机制，增强主动参与的能力与意识，更好地维护我国在国际投资领域的经济利益。本文通过探讨“投资者–国家”争议解决机制改革的主要原因，并对当前国际上主流的改革趋势进行深入分析，为我国在此趋势下提出建议和对策。
Due to the different interests of countries in international investment activities and dispute settlement, as well as some institutional limitations gradually revealed by the current “investor-state” dispute resolution mechanism, obvious differences have arisen between different countries in the reform of this dispute resolution mechanism. At present, the reform trend of the “investor-state” dispute resolution mechanism mainly includes two types of reforms: the gradual reform model of investment arbitration and the model of EU judicialized investment court. Analyzing the current trend of dispute mechanism reform will help China build a diversified investment dispute resolution mechanism, enhance its ability and awareness of active participation, and better safeguard China’s economic interests in the field of international investment. By discussing the main reasons for the reform of the “investor-state” dispute resolution mechanism, this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the current mainstream reform trend in the world, and makes suggestions and countermeasures for China under this trend.