|
《民法典》视域下居住权制度适用研究
|
Abstract:
《民法典》规定的居住权制度,保障了人民群众的基本生活居住需求,满足全体人民住有所居、老有所养的生活愿景,同时也为解决居住权纠纷提供了法律依据。在居住权的设立方式上,房屋所有人可选择以订立合同的方式也可选择以遗嘱的方式为他人在自己的房屋上设立居住权。然而在居住权的存续期限和消灭事由上,《民法典》规定得并不全面。为了更好将该居住权制度落实到实处,维护社会稳定与保障民生,有必要将这些问题予以明确。
The residence right system stipulated in the Civil Code guarantees the basic living needs of the people, satisfies the life vision of all people to have a place to live and support their old age, and also provides a legal basis for resolving disputes over the residence right. In the way of establishing the right of residence, the owner of the house can choose to establish the right of residence for others in the way of contract or in the way of will. However, in terms of the duration of the right of residence and the cause of its elimination, the Civil Code is not comprehensive. In order to better implement the residence right system, maintain social stability and protect people’s livelihood, it is necessary to clarify these problems.
[1] | 周枏. 罗马法原论(上册) [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014. |
[2] | 曾大鹏. 建筑物用益物权制度研究以权利体系的构建为中心[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2009. |
[3] | 薛军. 地役权与居住权问题评《物权法草案》第十四、十五章[J]. 中外法学, 2006, 18(1): 92-100. |
[4] | 房绍坤. 居住权立法不具有可行性[J]. 中州学刊, 2005(4): 72-74. |
[5] | 单平基. 《民法典》草案之居住权规范的检讨和完善[J]. 当代法学, 2019, 33(1): 3-15. |
[6] | 谭启平, 付一耀. 《民法典》居住权制度体系及其实现路径[J]. 江西社会科学, 2020(12): 148-159. |
[7] | 李璐, 姬一鸣. 共有产权型保障性住房的继承问题——兼谈居住权制度在住房保障体系中的适用[J]. 中国检察官, 2021(20): 29-34. |
[8] | 王利明. 论民法典物权编中居住权的若干问题[J]. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(7): 91-148. |
[9] | 屈然. 论我国居住权的设立方式与登记效力[J]. 法学杂志, 2020(12): 90-99. |
[10] | 房绍坤. 论民法典中的居住权[J]. 社会科学文摘, 2020(9): 69-71. |