|
|
AIMS65评分系统评估急性上消化道出血患者病情的研究进展
|
Abstract:
急性上消化道出血是消化系统常见的急症之一，发病率和病死率均较高，病情的危重程度是决定预后的关键因素之一。近年来，国内外专家组不断提出了许多判断病情危重程度的评估系统，而AIMS65作为2011年刚提出的评分系统，评分指标不仅简单易得，同时也避免了主观性，能在短时间内评估患者病情危重程度，便于临床应用。本文通过查阅最新发表的国内外相关临床研究，归纳整理了AIMS65评分系统预测急性上消化道出血患者病情危重程度的价值，以为临床广泛应用提供依据。
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the common emergencies of the digestive system, with high morbidity and mortality. The severity of the diseases is one of the key factors to deter-mine the prognosis. In recent years, experts at home and abroad have put forward many evaluation systems to judge the severity of the condition. As a scoring system just put forward in 2011, AIMS65 is not only simple, but also avoids subjectivity, and can assess the severity of the patient’s condition in a short time, which is convenient for clinical application. In this paper, the value of AIMS65 scor-ing system in predicting the severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was summarized by referring to the recently published clinical studies at home and abroad, so as to provide a basis for its extensive clinical application.
| [1] | Mullady, D.K., Wang, A.Y. and Waschke, K.A. (2020) AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Therapies for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Expert Review. Gastroenterology, 159, 1120-1128.
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.095 |
| [2] | Gralnek, I.M., Stanley, A.J., Morris, A.J., Camus, M., Lau, J., et al. (2021) Endoscopic Diagnosis and Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (NVUGIH): Eu-ropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline—Update 2021. Endoscopy, 53, 300-332. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1369-5274 |
| [3] | Sung, J.J., Chiu, P.W., Chan, F., et al. (2018) Asia-Pacific Working Group Consensus on Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Update 2018. Gut, 67, 1757-1768. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316276 |
| [4] | 《中华内科杂志》编辑委员会, 《中华医学杂志》编辑委员会, 《中华消化杂志》编辑委员会, 《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑委员会, 中国医师协会内镜医师分会消化内镜专业委员会. 急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血诊治指南(2018年, 杭州) [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2019, 58(3): 173-180. |
| [5] | Wang, X.Y. and Chen, X.Y. (2016) Significance of AIMS65 Risk Scoring System in Evaluating Prog-nosis of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. World Chinese Journal of Digestology, 24, 4013-4018. (In Chinese)
https://doi.org/10.11569/wcjd.v24.i28.4013 |
| [6] | 庞艳华, 杜丽川, 郝建宇, 等. 急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血内镜下诊治分析及Glasgow-Blatchford评分系统在急诊内镜检查前的预判作用[J]. 中国急救医学, 2018, 38(9): 810-813. |
| [7] | 张一杰, 王真. AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血中的应用及预后评估价值[J]. 中国急救医学, 2017, 37(10): 932-934. |
| [8] | 季成菊, 马臻棋. Blatchford、Rockall 和 AIMS65 评分系统预测老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血预后的研究进展[J]. 国际消化病杂志, 2017, 37(5): 303-305. |
| [9] | 董丽丽, 周荣斌. 急性上消化道出血救治研究现状[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2021, 41(3): 203-208.
https://doi.org/10.19538/j.nk2021030107 |
| [10] | 彭景. 急性上消化道出血预后相关危险因素分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广州医科大学, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.27043/d.cnki.ggzyc.2021.000266 |
| [11] | 李静蕾, 程平, 盛卫勇, 张进祥. 急性上消化道出血止血新技术的诊疗进展[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2021, 29(18): 1035-1042. |
| [12] | Saltzman, J.R., Tabak, Y.P., Hyett, B.H., et al. (2011) A Simple Risk Score Accurately Predicts in-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost in Acute Upper GI Bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 74, 1215-1224.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024 |
| [13] | 冯洁, 潘存伟, 段杨丽, 等. AIMS65评分在急性上消化道出血患者危险分级及预后评估中的作用[J]. 医学信息, 2021, 34(2): 90-94. |
| [14] | 王喜莹, 陈香宇. AIMS65评分系统对急性上消化道出血预后的评估价值[J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2016, 24(28): 4013-4018. |
| [15] | Vieira, E. and Azeve-do-Filho, H. (2019) Vasospasm Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. In: July, J. and Wahjoepramono, E., Eds., Neurovascular Surgery, Springer, Singapore, 249-254.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8950-3_29 |
| [16] | 付莉霞. 基于Rockall评分的护理流程优化用于急性非静脉曲张上消化道出血的临床效果[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2017, 22(3): 440-442. |
| [17] | Franco, M.C., Jang, S., Martins, B.D.C., et al. (2021) Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Com-parison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System. Clinical Endoscopy, 55, 240-247. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.115 |
| [18] | Chang, A., Ouejiaraphant, C., Akarapatima, K., Rattanasupa, A. and Prachayakul, V. (2021) Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Clin-ical Endoscopy, 54, 211-221.
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.068 |
| [19] | 涂家红, 张明清, 赵斌. 危险性急性上消化道出血141例临床诊治分析[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2018, 27(5): 518-523. |
| [20] | 邓海艳, 李娟, 张冰. 双管双输法在急性上消化道出血患者血容量补充中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2020, 21(1): 87-91. |
| [21] | Abougergi, M.S., Charpentier, J.P., Bethea, E., et al. (2016) A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the AIMS65 Score Compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in Predicting Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 50, 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000395 |
| [22] | Stanley, A.J., Laine, L., Dalton, H.R., et al. (2017) Com-parison of Risk Scoring Systems for Patients Presenting with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: International Multicentre Prospective Study. BMJ, 356, Article No. i6432.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6432 |
| [23] | 陈金, 张伟, 郑松柏, 姚健凤. 四种评分系统对老年人急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血干预及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2020, 19(8): 561-565. |
| [24] | Curdia-Goncalves, T., Barbosa, M., Xavier, S., et al. (2018) Optimizing the Risk Assessment in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of 5 Scores Predicting 7 Outcomes. GE—Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterolo-gy, 25, 299-307.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000486802 |
| [25] | 刘会领, 罗雁, 李长平, 等. Rockall、Blatchford和AIMS65评分系统在急性上消化道出血诊治中的价值[J]. 天津医药, 2017, 45(4): 423-427. |
| [26] | 刘军红, 彭琼. Rockall、Blatchford和AIMS65评分系统在不同原因急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者中的应用价值[J]. 中国处方药, 2022, 20(3): 158-160. |
| [27] | 孙丽芳. 限制输血对急性上消化道出血患者止血率及再出血发生风险的影响[J]. 中国现代医生, 2021, 59(10): 10-12+17. |
| [28] | 李青云, 肖鹏, 梁蓉. AIMS65评分对输血治疗必要性的预测价值[J]. 中国医学创新, 2017, 14(22): 44-46. |
| [29] | 黄彩云, 罗忠志, 刘林勇. AIMS65评分系统对急性非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者输血治疗和内镜下止血治疗的评估价值[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(31): 42-46. |
| [30] | Palmer, A.J., Moroni, F., Mcleish, S., et al. (2016) Risk Assessment in Acute Non-Variceal Upper GI Bleeding: The AIMS65 Score in Compari-son with the Glasgow-Blatchford Score in a Scottish Population. Frontline Gastroenterology, 7, 90-96. https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2015-100594 |
| [31] | 聂琳, 章礼久. AIMS65与Blatchford评分系统在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血中的应用比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2018, 39(3): 312-315. |
| [32] | 田浩, 熊永红, 陶洁, 等. 重症上消化道出血患者的临床特征及死亡相关危险因素分析[J]. 中国医药, 2022, 17(4): 544-548. |
| [33] | Kim, M.S., Choi, J. and Shin, W.C. (2019) AIMS65 Scoring System Is Comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford Score or Rockall Score for Predic-tion of Clinical Outcomes for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. BMC Gastroenterology, 19, Article No. 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8 |
| [34] | Robertson, M, Majumdar, A, Boyapati, R., et al. (2016) Risk Stratification in Acute Upper GI Bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 Score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scoring Systems. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 83, 1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021 |
| [35] | 李青云, 肖鹏, 梁蓉. AIMS65评分对内镜止血必要性的预测价值[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(6): 14-16.
https://doi.org/10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2017.06.006 |
| [36] | 赵尚飞, 黄妮, 宋明全. AIMS65与Blatchford评分评估上消化道出血的比较研究[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(2): 92-97. https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.02.003 |
| [37] | 杨丽. 急性上消化道大出血介入治疗现状[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2022, 53(3): 361-366. |
| [38] | 陈志彪, 高春雷. 不同评分系统评估上消化道出血患者危险分层的价值比较[J]. 现代仪器与医疗, 2018, 24(5): 60-62. |
| [39] | 黄学峰, 林晓红. 比较AIMS65评分与GBS评分对急诊抢救室上消化道出血患者临床不良事件的预测价值[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2021, 22(9): 622-626. https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1009-5918.2021.09.011 |
