|
革兰阳性菌致脓毒症大鼠血清炎症因子浓度变化的研究
|
Abstract:
目的:研究革兰氏阳性细菌所致脓毒症大鼠血浆炎症因子的浓度变化,寻找脓毒症早期免疫干预的方式及最佳时机。方法:选取96只SD雄性大鼠,随机分组革兰氏阳性组(G+组,n = 48)、生理盐水组(NS组,n = 48),分别腹腔注射热灭活金黄色葡萄球菌(7.35 × 1012 CFU/Kg)、生理盐水,注射体积均为3 ml,造模成功后分别于2小时、4小时、6小时、8小时、12小时、24小时、48小时、72小时予以乙醚吸入麻醉革兰氏阳性大鼠6只及NS组大鼠6只,尾静脉采血,即刻离心机离心,取上清液用ELISA检测试剂盒检测各组大鼠血清TNF-α、IL-1β、IL-6、IL-10浓度。结果:G+组大鼠血清IL-10于2小时达到峰值,IL-1β、TNF-α于6小时达到峰值,IL-6于8小时达到峰值,各炎症因子与NS组对比差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。NS组血清IL-10、IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α从2小时开始变化不大,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:腹腔注射热灭活革兰阳性菌构建的脓毒症模型,2小时内开始免疫增强治疗,可能对脓毒症的治疗极具意义。
Objective: To study the changes of plasma inflammatory factors in septic rats caused by Gram- posi-tive bacteria, and to find the way and the best opportunity for early immune intervention in sepsis. Methods: 96 SD male rats were randomly divided into Gram-positive group (G+ group, n = 48) and normal saline group (NS group, n = 48). Heat-inactivated Staphylococcus aureus (7.35 × 1012 CFU/Kg) and normal saline were injected intraperitoneally respectively, and the injection volume was 3 ml. After successful modeling, 6 Gram-positive rats and 6 NS rats were anesthetized with ether at 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours respectively. The chest cavity was opened, blood was taken from the heart, and the supernatant was immediately centrifuged by centrifuge. The serum concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 in each group were detected by ELISA detection kit. Results: Serum IL-10 in G+ group peaked at 2 hours, IL-1β and TNF-α peaked at 6 hours, and IL-6 peaked at 8 hours. The differences of inflammatory factors be-tween G+ group and NS group were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Serum IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in NS group changed little from 2 hours, and the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The sepsis model established by intraperitoneal injection of heat-inactivated Gram-positive bacteria can start immune enhancement therapy within 2 hours, which may be of great significance to the treatment of sepsis.
[1] | Reinhart, K., Daniels, R., Kissoon, N., et al. (2017) Recognizing Sepsis as a Global Health Priority—A WHO Resolution. New England Journal of Medicine, 377, 414-417. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1707170 |
[2] | Wichterman, K.A., Baue, A.E. and Chaudry, I.H. (1980) Sepsis and Septic Shock—A Review of Laboratory Models and a Proposal. Jour-nal of Surgical Research, 29, 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4804(80)90037-2 |
[3] | 陈雪阳, 任珊, 许航. 革兰氏阳性细菌与革兰氏阴性细菌所致脓毒症大鼠心肌损伤后心肌酶变化的比较[J]. 中华灾害救援医学, 2019, 7(10): 547-550. |
[4] | 姚咏明, 张艳敏. 脓毒症发病机制最新认识[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2017, 30(7): 678-683. |
[5] | Ronco, C., Tetta, C., Mariano, F., et al. (2003) Interpreting the Mechanisms of Continuous Renal Re-placement Therapy in sepsis:the Peak Concentration Hypothesis. Artificial Organs, 27, 792-801.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1594.2003.07289.x |
[6] | Summer, W.R. (2004) Severe Sepsis: New Concepts in Pathogenesis and Management. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 328, 193-195. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200410000-00001 |
[7] | Johnson, D. and Mayers, I. (2001) Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 48, 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03028318 |
[8] | Marshall, J.C. (2000) SIRS and MODS: What Is Their Relevance to the Science and Practice of Intensive Care? Shock, 14, 586-589. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024382-200014060-00002 |
[9] | 姜晓东. 血必净注射液对脓毒症患者B型尿钠肽、肿瘤坏死因子α及C反应蛋白的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2012. |
[10] | Yang, S., Yu, Z., Wang, L., et al. (2017) The Natural Product Bergenin Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury by Inhibiting NF-KappaB Activition. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 200, 147-155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2017.02.013 |
[11] | 张蕾, 杨宗树. 贮存式自体输血对择期手术患者血清IFN-γ、IL-10的影响[J]. 农垦医学, 2019, 41(6): 500-505. |
[12] | Shrum, B., Anantha, R.V., Xu, S.X., et al. (2014) A Robust Scoring System to Evaluate Sepsis Severity in an Animal Model. BMC Research Notes, 7, Article No. 233. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-233 |
[13] | Novotny, A.R., Reim, D., Assfalg, V., et al. (2012) Mixed Antago-nist Response and Sepsis Severity-Dependent Dysbalance of Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Responses at the Onset of Postoperative Sepsis. Immunobiology, 217, 616-621.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2011.10.019 |
[14] | Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., et al. (2021) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Intensive Care Medicine, 47, 1181-1247.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y |
[15] | Jiang, W., Zhong, W., Deng, Y., et al. (2018) Evaluation of a Combination “Lymphocyte Apoptosis Model” to Predict Survival of Sepsis Patients in an Intensive Care Unit. BMC An-esthesiology, 18, Article No. 89.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0535-3 |