全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

明代巡按御史的地方司法职能初探——基于明代法律诉讼程序与司法机构框架
A Probe into the Local Judicial Function of the Ming Dynasty’s Patrol Governor—Based on the Framework of Legal Proceedings and Judicial Institutions in the Ming Dynasty

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.125296, PP. 2181-2191

Keywords: 中国法制史,巡按御史,监察制度,明代司法
Chinese Legal History
, Patrol Governor, Supervisory System, Justice of the Ming Dynasty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

巡按御史作为明代设立的一种特殊官职,其品阶低而权力大,职权囊括经济、司法、监察、教化等多个方面,在所分巡的地方具有极其重要的作用。就明代地方的法律诉讼程序与司法机构框架来看,巡按御史作为都察院直属的中央官员参与到了案件诉讼与司法管理之中,进而实现了对地方的法律监督,并为民间诉讼提供了新的解决途径。其在维护中央集权与君主专制的同时,也有效惩治了地方贪官污吏,解决了部分民间诉讼,是封建社会法制建设的一项重要突破。尽官巡按御史制度仍具有局限性,但仍可为现代法制建设提供启示,是值得深刻研究的一项重要法制制度。
As a special official position established in the Ming Dynasty, the governor of the imperial court had a low rank and great power. His functions and powers included economic, judicial, supervi-sory, educational, and other aspects, and played an extremely important role in the areas under his supervision. From the perspective of local legal proceedings and the framework of judicial institutions in the Ming Dynasty, as a central official directly under the capital procurator ate, the governor participated in case litigation and judicial management, thereby realizing legal supervi-sion of the local authorities, and providing a new solution for civil litigation. While maintaining centralized power and autocratic monarchy, it also effectively punished local corrupt officials and solved some civil lawsuits, which was an important breakthrough in the construction of the legal system in feudal society. The system of performing official duties and patrolling the imperial court still has limitations, but it can still provide inspiration for the construction of modern legal systems. It is an important legal system that is worthy of in-depth study.

References

[1]  李东阳, 申时行, 等. 《明会典》(万历朝重修本)卷二百十三[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1989.
[2]  李青. 明朝盛行的巡按制度——廉政法制建设的先导[J]. 人民法治, 2017(1): 88.
[3]  李东阳, 申时行, 等. 《明会典》(万历朝重修本)卷二百十[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1989.
[4]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷七十三[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[5]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷九十三[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[6]  李东阳, 申时行, 等. 《明会典》(万历朝重修本)卷二百十四[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1989.
[7]  付海梅. 明代的巡按御史制度研究[J]. 兰台世界, 2014(35): 156-157.
[8]  李东阳, 申时行, 等. 《明会典》(万历朝重修本)卷二百十一之一[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1989.
[9]  颜奇英, 史坤坤. 明代巡按御史制度及其历史镜鉴[J]. 长春大学学报, 2015, 30(5): 101-105.
[10]  范忠信, 陈景良. 中国法制史[M]. 第二版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 339-340.
[11]  张卤. 《皇明制书(明万历刻本)》(影印版)卷九 教民榜文[M]. 台北: 成文出版社, 2018.
[12]  罗显. 杨干院归结始末[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学院历史研究所图书馆藏, 2017.
[13]  刘吉. 《明实录》二百九十三卷 宪宗纯皇帝实录[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2016.
[14]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷一百五十九[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[15]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷六十六[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[16]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷一百六十[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[17]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷二百四十一[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[18]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷二百三[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[19]  张廷玉, 等. 《明史》(繁体竖排版)卷四十九[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[20]  程惠霞. 明代巡按御史机制及其反腐败功能研究——基于委托代理制度分析框架[J]. 中国行政管理, 2017(2): 97-101.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133