破产撤销中后顺位抵押权的模式选择
The Mode Choice of Mortgage in the Middle and Rear of Bankruptcy Revocation

在当前经济快速发展、竞争愈发激烈的情况下，企业破产的现象较为普遍，破产人为防止自己财产进入破产程序，将自己的财产转移至别处或者以不合理的价格与第三人进行对债权人来说是诈骗的交易行为，侵犯了破产债权人的合法权益。目前，我国在法律上规定了破产撤销权用于解决上述问题，但是在同一物上多个抵押担保的情况下行使破产撤销权仍然存在争议，就后顺位如何保留问题，存在抵押权顺位升进主义和抵押权固定主义两种模式。本文主要探究的是破产程序下应当采取何种模式的问题。
In the current situation of rapid economic development and increasingly fierce competition, the phenomenon of enterprise bankruptcy is relatively common. In order to prevent their property from entering bankruptcy proceedings, the bankrupt transfers their property to other places or conducts fraudulent transactions with a third party at an unreasonable price, which violates the legitimate rights and interests of the bankrupt creditors. At present, Chinese law makes bankruptcy revocation right to solve the above problems, but it is still controversial to exercise bankruptcy revocation right under the situation of multiple mortgage guarantee on the same thing, how to retain the latter, there are two modes of the mortgage right promotion doctrine and the mortgage fixed doctrine. This paper mainly explores what kind of model should be adopted under bankruptcy procedure.