|
单位犯罪案件研判的思维路径建构
|
Abstract:
由于在单位犯罪诸多极其基础的理论问题上一直存在理解上的偏差,因此单位犯罪案件研判的思维路径始终难以形成统一的认识。在罪责自负原则与罪责刑关系原理的指导下,本文强调应当首先肯定单位犯罪案件中自然人和单位的独立刑事主体地位,而后再以此为前提分别从自然人角度和单位角度对前述理论问题加以回答并论证。从自然人角度而言,我国刑法分则规定的所有单位犯罪均属于不纯正单位犯罪,同时“直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员”是指所有参与实施了单位犯罪且自身成立自然人犯罪的单位成员;从单位角度而言,单位的客观危害行为是指满足了形式要求与目的要求的自然人(单位成员)的客观危害行为,单位的主观罪过是指单位对“单位成员实施的会被上升评价为单位行为的危害行为发生危害结果”的态度,具体以单位的刑事合规计划的制定和执行情况为依据。除此之外,单双罚制的创设不仅面临重大理论困境而且存在画蛇添足之嫌,单位犯罪案件中的刑罚处罚只需严格遵循罪责自负原则与罪责刑关系原理即可。在上述回答和论证的基础上,本文最终建构了逻辑自洽的单位犯罪案件研判的思维路径。
Due to the deviation of understanding on many basic theoretical problems of unit crime, it is diffi-cult to form a unified understanding of the thinking path of the study of unit crime cases. Under the guidance of the principle of self-responsibility and the principle of the relationship between crime, criminal responsibility and penalty, this paper emphasizes that we should first affirm the independent criminal subject status of natural person and unit in unit crime cases, and then answer and demonstrate the aforementioned theoretical questions from the perspective of natural person and unit respectively on this premise. From the perspective of natural person, all unit crimes stipulated in the provisions of our criminal law are not pure unit crimes. Meanwhile, “directly responsible in charge and other directly responsible personnel” refers to all members of units who participate in the implementation of unit crimes and set up natural person’s crimes. From the perspective of the unit, the objective harmful behavior of the unit refers to the objective harmful behavior of the natural person (unit member) who meets the requirements of form and purpose, while the subjective sin of the unit refers to the attitude of the unit toward “harmful behavior carried out by unit member that will be evaluated as the unit’s behavior will produce harmful results”. It is based on the development and implementation of the criminal compliance plan of the unit. In addition, the creation of odd and double punishment system is not only faced with a great theoretical dilemma, but also exists the suspicion of gilding the lily. The penalty punishment in unit crime cases only needs to strictly follow the principle of self-responsibility and the principle of the relationship between crime, criminal responsibility and penalty. On the basis of the above answers and arguments, this paper finally constructs the logical self-consistent thinking path of unit crime case.
[1] | 谢治东. 单位犯罪中个人刑事责任根据之检讨——走出我国传统单位犯罪理论之迷思[J]. 刑法论丛, 2011(4): 47-68. |
[2] | 王良顺. 单位犯罪论[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2008: 131. |
[3] | 黎宏. 单位刑事责任论[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2001: 27-32. |
[4] | [法]卡斯东·斯特法尼. 法国刑法总论精义[M]. 罗洁珍, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 1998: 288. |
[5] | [德]魏德士. 法理学[M]. 吴越, 丁晓春, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2005: 289. |
[6] | 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第6版(上). 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 171-178. |
[7] | 江平, 龙卫球. 法人本质及其基本构造研究——为拟制说辩护[J]. 中国法学, 1998(3): 71-79. |
[8] | 李会彬. 刑事合规制度与我国刑法的衔接问题研究[J]. 北方法学, 2022(1): 79-89. |
[9] | 卢勤忠. 民营企业的刑事合规及刑事风险防范探析[J]. 法学论坛, 2020(4): 127-137. |
[10] | 高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 第九版. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 高等教育出版社, 2019: 100. |
[11] | 黎宏. 论单位犯罪的主观要件[J]. 法商研究(中南政法学院学报), 2001(4): 45-54. |
[12] | 陆翼德. 试论单位犯罪中刑、民两种性质的交叉关系[J]. 中国法学, 1986(6): 24-29. |
[13] | 孙国祥. 刑事合规的理念、机能和中国的构建[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2019(2): 3-24. |
[14] | 周振杰. 企业合规的刑法立法问题研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2021(5): 42-54. |
[15] | 刘艳红. 企业合规不起诉改革的刑法教义学根基[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(1): 107-123. |
[16] | 赵秉志. 单位犯罪比较研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 167. |
[17] | 周舟. 新视角下的单位犯罪处罚原则研究[J]. 安徽广播电视大学学报, 2011(2): 21-26. |
[18] | 张明楷. 法益初论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2000: 67-72. |