全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

《民法典》时代我国隔代探望权问题探析
Analysis on the Problem of Grandparents’ Right of Visitation in the Civil Code Era

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.113136, PP. 946-954

Keywords: 隔代探望权,法无禁止即可为,儿童权益
Grandparents’ Right of Visitation
, Nothing Is Prohibited by Law, Rights and Interests of Children

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在我国隔代探望权并未在法律中得以明确规定,在司法实践中该问题存在已久,结合实践,其应当受到法律的重视。其是(外)祖父母在探望(外)孙子女受阻时寻求法律救济的依据。我国《民法典》在编撰的过程中关于此问题的争议较大,最终该制度未在民法典中明确规定。实践中隔代探望权纠纷仍判决不一。司法实践中支持符合条件的隔代探望权符合公序良俗原则,针对隔代探望权主体不明确、行使方式存在不特定等的问题,为更好地实现隔代探望权的救济应当坚持儿童最大利益的原则、明确权利和义务相一致。在法典时代应当创新隔代探望权的行使方式,实现儿童利益的维护和老年人权益的保障,实现和谐家庭的构建。
The right of grandparents’ visitation is not clearly stipulated in the law. It has existed for a long time in judicial practice. Combined with practice, it should be paid more attention by law. It is the basis for grandparents to seek legal relief when they are prevented from visiting their grandchildren. In the process of compiling the Civil Code, there was a great dispute about this issue, and the system was not clearly stipulated in the Civil Code. In practice, grandparents’ visitation disputes are still divided. In judicial practice, the support of qualified grandparents’ visitation is in line with the principle of public order and good custom. In view of the unclear subject of grandparents’ visitation and the non-specific way of exercise, in order to better realize the relief of grandparents’ visitation, we should adhere to the principle of the greatest interests of children and make clear that the rights and obligations are consistent. In the age of law, we should innovate the way of exercising the grandparents’ visitation right, realize the protection of children’s interests and the protection of the elderly rights and interests, and realize the construction of a harmonious family.

References

[1]  李春斌. 探望权独立身份权说——以《民法典》第1086条为中心[J]. 法治研究, 2022(6): 101-109.
https://doi.org/10.16224/j.cnki.cn33-1343/d.20221102.001
[2]  邹龙妹, 李春双. 老年人近亲属探望权的正当性和基本原则[J]. 求是, 2021, 48(2): 114-124.
https://doi.org/10.19667/j.cnki.cn23-1070/c.2021.02.012
[3]  付晓斌. 隔代亲情的法律保护——论隔代探望权的确立和制度设立设置[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2011: 1222.
[4]  李贝. 《民法典》时代隔代探望纠纷的裁判思路——从权利进路向义务进路的转向[J]. 法商研究, 2022, 39(4): 131-145.
https://doi.org/10.16390/j.cnki.issn1672-0393.2022.04.009
[5]  景春兰, 殷昭仙. 探望权及其主体扩展的立法思考——以“儿童最大利益”原则为视角[J]. 法学杂志, 2011, 32(8): 115-117.
https://doi.org/10.16092/j.cnki.1001-618x.2011.08.019
[6]  庄绪龙. “隔代探望”的法理基础、权利属性与类型区分[J]. 法律适用, 2017(23): 82-90.
[7]  韩国莉, 张瑞. 婚姻家庭法学问题研究[M]. 兰州: 甘肃民族出版社, 2014: 223.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133