|
|
子宫肌瘤高强度聚焦超声术后的妊娠率：已发表文献的综述
|
Abstract:
子宫肌瘤是育龄期女性最常见的妇科良性肿瘤，有生育要求的子宫肌瘤患者选择怎样的治疗方式对妊娠更有益是目前的难题，现有的治疗包括子宫肌瘤栓塞(uterine artery embolization, UAE)、子宫肌瘤切除术、激素治疗、高强度聚焦超声(high-intensity focused ultrasound, HIFU)消融治疗。本文阐述了高强度聚焦超声消融治疗子宫肌瘤后的妊娠情况，希望在未来为有生育要求的患者及临床医师提供参考，并与子宫肌瘤挖除术、子宫动脉栓塞术进行了比较，手术历来是保留生育的肌瘤治疗的常规手术选择。
Uterine fibroids are the most common gynecological benign tumors in women of reproductive age. What kind of treatment for patients with fertility requirements is more beneficial to pregnancy is the current problem. Available treatments include uterine fibroid embolization (UAE), hysteromy-ectomy, hormone therapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation. This study de-scribes the pregnancy after HIFU ablation, hoping to provide reference for clinicians and patients with fertility requirements in the future. And compared with hysteromyectomy and uterine artery embolization, surgery has always been the conventional surgical choice for the treatment of fertility preserving fibroids.
| [1] | De La Cruz, M.S. and Buchanan, E.M. (2017) Uterine Fibroids: Diagnosis and Treatment. American Family Physician, 95, 100-107. |
| [2] | Giuliani, E., As-Sanie, S. and Marsh, E.E. (2020) Epidemiology and Management of Uterine Fibroids. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 149, 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13102 |
| [3] | Harris, H.R., Petrick, J.L. and Rosenberg, L. (2022) The Epidemiology of Uterine Fibroids: Where Do We Go from Here? Fertility and Sterility, 117, 841-842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.037 |
| [4] | Coutinho, L.M., Assis, W.A., Spagnuolo-Souza, A. and Reis, F.M. (2022) Uterine Fibroids and Pregnancy: How Do They Affect Each Other? Repro-ductive Sciences, 29, 2145-2151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00656-6 |
| [5] | Freytag, D., et al. (2021) Uter-ine Fibroids and Infertility. Diagnostics, 11, Article 1455.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081455 |
| [6] | Griffiths, A., et al. (2012) High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Birth of a New Era of Noninvasive Surgery? Ultraschall in Medizin, 33, E8-E15. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1299407 |
| [7] | Ter Haar, G. (1995) Ultrasound Focal Beam Surgery. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 21, 1089-1100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(95)02010-1 |
| [8] | Fry, W.J., et al. (1954) Production of Focal Destructive Le-sions in the Central Nervous System with Ultrasound. Journal of Neurosurgery, 11, 471-478. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1954.11.5.0471 |
| [9] | 陈文直, 等. 单纯高强度聚焦超声治疗恶性实体肿瘤[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2002, 24(3): 278-281. |
| [10] | Vaezy, S., et al. (2000) Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Tumors in a Nude Mouse Model Using High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.105347 |
| [11] | 熊正爱, 邹建中, 陈文直. 高强度聚焦超声体外照射猴子宫的近远期影响研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2002, 18(1): 20. |
| [12] | Tempany, C.M., et al. (2003) MR Imaging-Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Uterine Leiomyomas: A Feasibility Study. Radiology, 226, 897-905. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2271020395 |
| [13] | Hua, Y.-Y., et al. (2014) Efficacy and Imaging Characteristics of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Treatment of Uterine Fibroid. Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 39, 212-216. |
| [14] | 郦鑫, 赵可, 赵鑫微. 高强度聚焦超声对子宫肌瘤患者术后血清白介素-10、肿瘤坏死因子-α、C反应蛋白水平及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国性科学, 2021, 30(6): 101-104. |
| [15] | Anneveldt, K.J., et al. (2021) Systematic Review of Reproductive Outcomes after High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. European Journal of Radiology, 141, Article ID: 109801.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109801 |
| [16] | Ciebiera, M. and ？oziński, T. (2020) The Role of Magnetic Reso-nance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Fertility-Sparing Treatment of Uterine Fibroids—Current Perspectives. Ecancer-medicalscience, 14, Article ID: 1034.
https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1034 |
| [17] | Lai, T.H.T., Seto, M.T.Y. and Cheung, V.Y.T. (2022) Intrapartum Uterine Rupture Following Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroid and Ad-enomyosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 60, 816-817. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24983 |
| [18] | Liu, L., Wang, T. and Lei, B. (2022) High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Ablation versus Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Meta-Analysis. European Radiology, 32, 1195-1204.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08156-6 |
| [19] | 仲林. 高强度聚焦超声与腹腔镜、开腹剔除治疗子宫肌瘤中远期复发及妊娠的比较及对住院时间、肌瘤复发情况的影响[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2019, 11(1): 44+43. |
| [20] | 邓少君, 林元媚, 彭慧柳. 海扶刀对子宫肌瘤患者治疗效果及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(3): 114-117. |
| [21] | 赵丽路, 刘媛, 任盼. 腹腔镜下肌瘤剔除术与高强度聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效及对再妊娠结局的影响[J]. 当代医学, 2022, 28(20): 16-18. |
| [22] | 王艳飞. 子宫肌瘤不同治疗方式对妊娠及妊娠后肌瘤复发的影响[J]. 中国民康医学, 2020, 32(1): 75-76+81. |
| [23] | 李平, 向玲, 李琳. 高强度聚焦超声子宫肌瘤消融术与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术后患者妊娠情况比较[J]. 中国医学装备, 2018, 15(3): 59-62. |
| [24] | 杜艳明, 刘佳. HIFU治疗子宫肌瘤合并不孕、不良孕产史患者的临床效果及对妊娠结局的作用探讨[J]. 中国保健营养, 2020, 30(31): 59. |
| [25] | 耿迎春, 顾丽萍. 对比高强度聚焦超声子宫肌瘤消融术, 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术两种方法影响术后患者妊娠的具体情况[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2019, 6(8): 63+63. |
| [26] | 马彩娟. 对比高强度聚焦超声子宫肌瘤消融术、腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术两种方法影响术后患者妊娠的具体情况[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2019, 6(26): 72. |
| [27] | McLucas, B., Voorhees III, W.D. and Elliott, S. (2016) Fertility after Uterine Artery Embolization: A Review. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies, 25, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2015.1074082 |
| [28] | Torre, A., et al. (2017) Fertility after Uterine Artery Emboli-zation for Symptomatic Multiple Fibroids with No Other Infertility Factors. European Radiology, 27, 2850-2859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4681-z |
| [29] | 林婷, 符秀梅, 陈梅花. UAE与HIFU治疗肌壁间子宫肌瘤的疗效比较. 西南国防医药, 2017, 27(1): 57-59. |
| [30] | Liu, L., Wang, T. and Lei, B. (2021) Uterine Artery Embolization Compared with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28, 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.004 |
| [31] | Yan, L., et al. (2022) High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treat-ment for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Hyperther-mia, 39, 230-238.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2022.2029956 |
| [32] | Shuzhen, G. (2019) Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treat-ment of Uterine Fibroids and Its Effect on Ovarian Function and Prognosis. Contemporary Medicine, 25, 53-55. |
| [33] | Ji, J., et al. (2022) Analysis of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Treatment of Uterine Fibroids on Ovarian Function and Pregnancy Outcome. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 50, 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23116 |
| [34] | Melkozerova, O., et al. (2020) How Noninvasive Treatment of Uterine Fi-broids Affects Endometrial Receptivity: A Prospective Cohort Study. Gynecological Endocrinology, 36, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2020.1816725 |
| [35] | Herrmann, A., et al. (2020) Adhesions after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, Complications and Prevention. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy, 9, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_87_20 |
| [36] | Liu, X., et al. (2020) High-Intensity Focused Ultra-sound (HIFU) for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids: Does HIFU Significantly Increase the Risk of Pelvic Adhesions? International Journal of Hyperthermia, 37, 1027-1032.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1811903 |
