|
实践视角下助产方向专业学位研究生临床实践基地评价指标的构建
|
Abstract:
目的:探讨构建全面、细化的助产方向专业学位研究生临床实践基地评价指标体系,促进我国助产方向专业学位研究生临床实践基地未来建设。方法:以非线性时变系统为理论模型,结合文献分析法、Delphi法将临床实践基地评价的输入变量、状态变量、输出变量采用空间内部描述并利用AHP层次法和优序图法进行指标条目的筛选。结果:两轮函询专家的积极系数分别为84.4%、74.1%,专家意见的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.230、0.297,均P < 0.01,Cronbach’ α系数0.930、0.965,构建了一级指标5项和二级指标14项、内涵指标76项的助产方向专业学位研究生临床实践基地评价指标体系。结论:初步构建了以母婴健康为服务宗旨,基地功能定位为基础的助产方向专业学位研究生临床实践基地评价体系。
Objective: To construct a comprehensive and detailed evaluation index system of clinical practice bases for midwifery oriented postgraduates, and to improve the future construction of the clinical practice bases. Methods: Using nonlinear time-varying system as theoretical model, combined with literature analysis, semi-structured expert interview, Delphi and analytic hierarchy process, the input variables and state variables of clinical practice base evaluation are screened and systemati-cally analyzed using spatial internal description to optimize index entries. Results: In the two rounds of letter inquiry, the positive coefficients of the experts were 84.4% and 74.1% respectively, and the Kendall harmony coefficient scores were 0.230 and 0.297, both P < 0.01. Cronbach’ α coeffi-cient scores were 0.930, 0.965. The evaluation index system of the clinical practice base for mid-wifery oriented postgraduates was established with 5 primary indicators, 14 secondary indicators and 78 tertiary indicators. Conclusion: Taking maternal and infant health as the service tenet and based on functional position, the evaluation system of clinical practice base for postgraduate in midwifery has been initially established.
[1] | World Health Organization (2016) Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health: Workforce 2030. World Health Or-ganization, Geneva. |
[2] | United Nations Population Fund (2021) International Confederation of Midwives, World Health Organization. State of the World’s Midwifery 2021. United Nations Population Fund, New York. |
[3] | Homer, C.S.E., Castro Lopes, S., Nove, A., et al. (2018) Barriers to and Strategies for Addressing the Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Quality of the Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Adolescent Health Workforce: Address-ing the Post-2015 Agenda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 18, 55.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1686-4 |
[4] | Luyben, A., Berger, M., Avery, M., et al. (2017) Exploring Glob-al Recognition of Quality Midwifery Education: Vision or Fiction? Women Birth, 30, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.03.001 |
[5] | Consensus Model for APRN Regulation: Licensure, Accredita-tion, Certification and Education. NCSBN.
https://ncsbn.org/papers/consensus-model-for-aprn-regulation-licensure-accreditation-certification-and-education |
[6] | Fullerton, J.T., Schuiling, K.D. and Sipe, T.A. (2019) The Doctorate of Nursing Practice and Entry into Midwifery Practice: Issues for Consideration and Debate. Nurse Education in Practice, 36, 97-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.02.001 |
[7] | 国务院学位委员会. 关于印发金融硕士等19种硕士专业学位设置方案的通知[EB/OL]. 2010-03-18.
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/201005/t20100513_92739.html, 2023-3-10. |
[8] | ICM Global Standards for Midwifery Education (Revised 2021).
https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2021/09/global-standards-for-midwifery-education_2021_en.pdf |
[9] | 教育部办公厅. 国家卫生健康委员会办公厅关于开展国家临床教学培训示范中心建设工作的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/moe_740/s3864/201805/t20180509_335476.html, 2018-05-02. |
[10] | 王颖, 李艳, 赫小宏, 汪亚琼. 中文版临床学习环境评价量表的信度、效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2015(6): 660-662, 663. |
[11] | 张洪杨, 梁悦, 班晓军, 吴奋. 一种新型非线性时变模型: 模糊变参数系统[J]. 电机与控制学报, 2016, 20(11): 86-91. https://doi.org/10.15938/j.emc.2016.11.012 |
[12] | Sue, M., Barbara, M., Marion, J., et al. (1998) The Nursing Outcomes Taxonomy: Development and Coding. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 12, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199808000-00010 |
[13] | Jorm, A.F. (2015) Using the Delphi Expert Consensus Method in Mental Health Research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 887-897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415600891 |
[14] | 杨益, 徐亚萍, 张蓉, 张楚妍, 刘媛媛, 史凌云. 护理硕士专业学位研究生临床实践视角下的基地培养现状与发展[J]. 新疆医学, 2022, 52(2): 211-213, 236. |
[15] | 罗彩凤, 孙婧, 贾静, 曹松梅, 柏素萍, 魏青. 护理硕士专业学位研究生临床实践现状调查分析[J]. 护理研究, 2018, 32(2): 289-292. |
[16] | 江虹, 丁福, 杨紫樱, 朱跃平, 刘墩秀, 杨君. 老年专科护士培训学员对重庆临床实践基地的评价[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(1): 32-37. |
[17] | WHO (2016) Strengthening Quality Midwifery Education: WHO Meet-ing Report 25-26 July 2016. |
[18] | McKellar, L. and Graham, K. (2017) A Review of the Literature to Inform a Best-Practice Clinical Supervision Model for Midwifery Students in Australia. Nurse Education in Practice, 24, 92-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.05.002 |
[19] | 严晓蕾, 潘沛, 王欣倍, 刘艳, 张伟. 培训基地住院医师规范化培训质量保证体系的建立[J]. 中国医院管理, 2019, 39(2): 60-61, 67. |
[20] | 崔飞, 李莉, 张建. 药学硕士专业学位研究生校企联合培养实践基地建设的探索[J]. 药学研究, 2022, 41(9): 625-626, 630. |
[21] | Nove, A., Pairman, S., Bohle, L.F., et al. (2018) The Development of a Global Midwifery Education Accreditation Programme. Global Health Action, 11, Article ID: 1489604. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1489604 |
[22] | The International Confeder-ation of Midwives (2021) Global Standards for Midwifery Education. |
[23] | Renfrew, M.J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M.H., et al. (2014) Midwifery and Quality Care: Findings from a New Evidence-Informed Framework for Maternal and Newborn Care. The Lancet, 384, 1129-1145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3 |
[24] | Smith, J.M., Currie, S., Azfar, P., et al. (2008) Establishment of an Accreditation System for Midwifery Education in Afghanistan: Maintaining Quality during National Expansion. Public Health, 122, 558-567.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.03.009 |