|
生猪粪水液态肥高量还田对黑土和风沙土养分含量的影响
|
Abstract:
随着“南养北上”新布局,东北生猪养殖量迅速增加,产生了大量液体粪污。生猪液体粪污处理方向由“治理”转“利用”。为探究生猪粪水液态粪肥还田利用后对土壤肥力的影响,在辽宁省康平县玉米地开展试验,以常耕施肥为对照(黑土区BCK、沙土区SCK),将生猪粪水厌氧发酵生成的液态肥以每亩20立方高量还田,研究猪粪水液态粪肥施用(黑土区BMS和沙土区SMS)对土壤养分含量的影响。结果表明:黑土区两次施用猪粪水后,有机碳、总碳、硝态氮、速效氮、总氮、有效磷、总磷含量均显著高于常规施肥处理显著,分别提高了60.89%、83.24%、120.53%、358.17%、58.83%、56.27%、95.82%,但土壤速效钾含量显著降低了49.34%。风沙土上施用猪粪水液态肥后,土壤硝态氮和有效磷含量均显著提高,分别提高了247.37%、105.34%。施用猪粪水液态肥后,黑土大部分养分含量提升幅度较大,增肥效果较好;风沙土与常规施肥处理土壤肥力差异不大。综上所述,在辽河流域黑土区施用猪粪水可显著提高土壤肥力,进而科学合理消纳猪粪水、促进东北地区黑土保墒培肥,并减少农业面源性污染,有利于推进东北地区种养结合循环利用模式。
With the new layout of “raising pigs from the south to the north”, the number of pigs raised in northeast China has increased rapidly, resulting in a large amount of liquid manure pollution. The treatment direction of pig liquid manure is changed from “treatment” to “utilization”. In order to explore the effects of returning liquid manure from pig manure to field on soil fertility, an experi-ment was carried out in Kangping County, Liaoning Province. Taking regular tillage and fertilization as the control (BCK in black soil area and SCK in sandy soil area), the liquid fertilizer generated by anaerobic fermentation from pig manure was returned to field at a high rate of 20 cubic meters per mu. The effects of liquid manure application (BMS in black soil area and SMS in sandy soil area) on soil nutrient content were studied. The results showed that: In the black soil area, the contents of organic carbon, total carbon, nitrate nitrogen, available nitrogen, total nitrogen, Available phosphorus and total phosphorus were significantly increased by 60.89%, 83.24%, 120.53%, 358.17%, 58.83%, 56.27% and 95.82%, respectively, after two application of pig manure water, but the soil available potassium content was significantly reduced by 49.34%. After the application of pig manure liquid fertilizer on the wind-blown sandy soil, the contents of nitrate nitrogen and available phosphorus in the soil were significantly increased by 247.37% and 105.34%, re-spectively. After the application of liquid fertilizer with pig manure water, the content of most nu-trients in black soil increased greatly, and the fertilizer effect was good. There was little difference in soil fertility between aeolian sand and conventional fertilization. In conclusion, the application of pig manure water in the black soil area of Liaohe River Basin can significantly improve soil fertility, so as to scientifically and rationally absorb pig manure water, promote soil moisture conservation and fertilizer cultivation in northeast China, and reduce agricultural non-point source pollution, which is
[1] | 牛新胜, 巨晓棠. 我国有机肥料资源及利用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1462-1479. |
[2] | 张朋月, 丁京涛, 孟海波, 等. 牛粪水酸化贮存过程中氮形态转化的特性研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(8): 212-218. |
[3] | 周海宾, 丁京涛, 孟海波, 等. 中国畜禽粪污资源化利用技术应用调研与发展分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(9): 237-246. |
[4] | 张诩, 乔娟. 基于种养结合的种植户粪肥支付意愿研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(8): 177-186. |
[5] | 李艳苓, 耿兵, 朱昌雄. 畜禽养殖业面源污染微生物发酵床控制技术应用与防治建议[J]. 中国猪业, 2017, 12(7): 25-29. |
[6] | 程娟, 付莉, 翟中葳, 等. 化肥减施下粪水替代对设施白菜氮利用与土壤氮盈余的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2021, 40(11): 2551-2558. |
[7] | 陈贺亮. 辽宁省大型生猪规模养殖场污水治理模式调研和处理效果对比[J]. 新农业, 2015(17): 34-36. |
[8] | Hornig, G., Turk, M. and Wanka, U. (1999) Slurry Covers to Reduce Ammonia Emission and Odour Nuisance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73, 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0402 |
[9] | Kai, P., Pedersen, P., Jensen, J.E., et al. (2008) A Whole-Farm Assessment of the Efficacy of Slurry Acidification in Reducing Ammonia Emissions. European Journal of Agronomy, 28, 148-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.06.004 |
[10] | Fangueiro, D., Hjorth, M. and Gioelli, F. (2015) Acidification of Animal Slurry: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management, 149, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.001 |
[11] | Ten Hoeve, M., Nyord, T., Perers, G.M., et al. (2016) A Life Cycle Perspective of Slurry Acidification Strategies under Different Nitrogen Regulations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 591-599.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.014 |
[12] | 李晨艳, 乔玮, 董仁杰. 养殖场粪污氨排放控制的管理对策分析[J]. 四川环境, 2017, 36(3): 147-153. |
[13] | Dai, X.R. and Blanes-vidal, V. (2013) Emissions of Ammonia, Carbon Dioxide, and Hydrogen Sulfide from Swine Wastewater during and after Acidification Treatment: Effect of pH, Mixing and Aeration. Journal of Environmental Management, 115, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.019 |
[14] | S?rensen, P. and Eriksen, J. (2009) Effects of Slurry Acidifi-cation with Sulphuric Acid Combined with Aeration on the Turnover and Plant Availability of Nitrogen. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 131, 240-246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.01.024 |
[15] | Regueiro, I., Coutinho, J. and Fangueiro, D. (2016) Alternatives to Sulfuric Acid for Slurry Acidification: Impact on Slurry Composition and Ammonia Emissions during Storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 296-307.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.032 |
[16] | 邢向欣, 赵国明, 裴海林. 东北地区沼气发酵技术现状研究[J]. 农业与技术, 2017, 37(19): 87-89+100. |
[17] | Srensen, P. and Amato, M. (2002) Remineralisation and Residual Effects of N after Application of Pig Slurry to Soil. European Journal of Agronomy, 16, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00119-8 |
[18] | 孙国峰, 郑建初, 陈留根, 等. 沼液替代化肥对麦季CH4, N2O排放及温室效应的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(8): 1654-1661. |
[19] | 吴华山, 郭德杰, 马艳, 等. 猪粪沼液施用对土壤氨挥发及玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(2): 163-168. |
[20] | 杜臻杰, 樊向阳, 李中阳, 等. 猪场沼液灌溉对冬小麦生长和品质的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(3): 547-554. |
[21] | 赵莉, 于建光, 常志州, 等. 施用沼液对水芹产量及品质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2014, 46(1): 94-99. |
[22] | Silvia, B., Markus, G. and Bettina, E. (2014) Phosphorus Availability and Soil Microbial Activity in a 3 Year Field Experiment Amended with Digested Dairy Slurry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 70, 429-439.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.08.004 |
[23] | 徐海东, 董合林, 苏丽丽, 等. 液态有机肥对滴灌棉花光合特性及产量形成规律的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(20): 71-77. |
[24] | 徐瑞强, 董合林, 徐文修, 等. 喷施浓缩沼液对棉花幼苗生长发育和生理特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(3): 261-271. |
[25] | 付莉, 王贵云, 杜连柱, 等. 猪场废水施用对设施白菜地土壤氮盈余的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(2): 215-222. |
[26] | 李然, 余雪标, 高刘, 等. 畜禽粪便沼液肥对苦瓜光合作用、产量的影响[J]. 中国沼气, 2017, 35(2): 110-114. |
[27] | Ai, P., Jin, K., Alengebawy, A., et al. (2020) Effect of Application of Different Biogas Fertilizer on Eggplant Production: Analysis of Fertilizer Value and Risk Assessment. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 19, Article ID: 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101019 |
[28] | 陈年来, 毛昊昊, 陈思瑾, 等. 叶面喷施沼液肥对温室香瓜茄叶片光合特性、果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2021, 34(4): 88-93. |
[29] | 裴雪霞, 党建友, 张定一, 等. 化肥减施下有机替代对小麦产量和养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1768-1781. |
[30] | 宁建凤, 徐培智, 杨少海, 等. 有机无机肥配施对菜地土壤氮素径流流失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3): 17-21. |
[31] | 马臣, 刘艳妮, 梁路, 等. 有机无机肥配施对旱地冬小麦产量和硝态氮残留淋失的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1240-1248. |
[32] | Du, H., Gao, W., Li, J., et al. (2019) Effects of Digested Biogas Slurry Appli-cation Mixed with Irrigation Water on Nitrate Leaching during Wheat-Maize Rotation in the North China Plain. Agri-cultural Water Management, 213, 882-893.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.012 |
[33] | Omar Alaa El-din, K., Belal Elsayed, B. and El-Abd Abd El-Naiem, A. (2012) Effects of Foliar Application with Compost Tea and Filtrate Biogas Slurry Liquid on Yield and Fruit Quality of Washington Navel Orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) Trees. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995), 62, 767-772.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2012.676381 |
[34] | 郭治国, 李梓丹, 刘华, 等. 不同比例沼液施用量对苜蓿生长发育、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1006-1012. |
[35] | 汪军, 王德建, 张刚, 等. 连续全量秸秆还田与氮肥用量对农田土壤养分的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2010, 24(5): 40-44+62. |
[36] | 付莉, 王贵云, 杜会英, 等. 养殖肥水施用对土壤氨挥发的影响及响应因素[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(6): 931-938. |
[37] | Hernández, D., Polo, A. and Plaza, C. (2013) Long-Term Effects of Pig Slurry on Barley Yield and N Use Efficiency under Semiarid Mediterranean Conditions. European Journal of Agronomy, 44, 78-86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.09.001 |
[38] | 陈广银, 曹海南, 吴佩, 等. 稻麦轮作下施用猪粪水对作物生长及农田土壤质量的影响[J/OL]. 土壤学报: 1-10.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1119.P.20220526.0839.004.html, 2023-01-20. |
[39] | 杜会英, 冯洁, 郭海刚, 等. 麦季牛场肥水灌溉对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作土壤氮素平衡的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(3): 159-165. |
[40] | 齐星宇. 辽河上游面源污染负荷估算及评价[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2019. |
[41] | 师晓春. 辽宁省生猪养殖业污染防治对策研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2020(10): 15-16+19. |
[42] | 侯福银, 杨智青, 金崇富, 等. 猪粪沼液施用量对水稻农艺性状和青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(20): 124-131. |
[43] | 唐华, 郭彦军, 李智燕. 沼液灌溉对黑麦草生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(6): 939-942. |
[44] | 杨继昌, 张德, 王双成, 等. 施用沼液对黄土高原雨养农业区苹果园土壤生态及果实品质的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(6): 105-113, 121. |
[45] | 朱娟玉, 李正山, 邓良伟. 猪粪水特性的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008(4): 1578-1579+1588. |
[46] | 李硕, 王选, 张西群, 等. 猪场肥水施用对玉米-小麦农田氨排放、氮素利用与表观平衡的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(10): 1502-1514. |
[47] | 李娇, 张学英, 时连辉, 等. 鸭粪沼液施用浓度对土壤肥力及芹菜生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(12): 130-136. |
[48] | 刘敏, 纪立东, 王锐, 等. 沼液配施化肥对土壤质量及作物生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(5): 68-76. |
[49] | 郑学博, 樊剑波, 崔键, 等. 沼液化肥配施对旱地红壤花生养分吸收分配和产量的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2016, 32(2): 332-337. |
[50] | 王贵云, 张克强, 付莉, 等. RZWQM2模型模拟牛场肥水施用夏玉米土壤硝态氮迁移特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(14): 47-54. |
[51] | 孙铭鸿, 蒋炳伸, 沈健林, 等. 猪粪化肥配施对稻田土壤氮素含量及氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(1): 175-183. |
[52] | 齐文, 王德刚, 何贤彪, 等. 沼液替代化肥对青菜产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2022, 63(5): 988-990+995. |
[53] | 于海霞, 陈荣荣, 李泽青, 等. 畜禽养殖场肥水还田存在问题及对策[J]. 天津农业科学, 2022, 28(2): 83-86. |
[54] | 秦乃群, 陈现朝, 高敬伟, 等. 沼液施用对花生小麦轮作土壤养分和重金属含量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2022, 50(10): 1422-1428. |
[55] | 张秀芝, 高洪军, 彭畅, 等. 长期有机培肥黑土有机碳、全氮及玉米产量稳定性的变化特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(9): 1473-1481. |
[56] | 乔云发, 苗淑杰, 陆欣春, 等. 东北风沙土区玉米田剖面土壤障碍因子分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(3): 148-154+162. |