|
东营凹陷泥页岩沉积相分析
|
Abstract:
综合运用岩心、薄片和X-射线衍射全岩矿物分析等资料,在前人对东营凹陷沙四上–沙三下亚段泥页岩矿物组分成因认识的基础上,根据泥页岩矿物组分的来源和沉积作用,将东营凹陷泥页岩沉积相分为陆源相、混源相和湖源相。根据岩相和泥页岩沉积构造特点,进一步将陆源相划分为层状灰质泥岩亚相和块状灰质泥岩亚相,混源相划分为纹层状混源亚相和层状混源亚相,湖源相划分为膏盐亚相和碳酸盐亚相。东营凹陷沙四上–沙三下亚段泥页岩沉积相:从下至上依次发育湖源膏盐亚相–湖源碳酸盐亚相–纹层状混源亚相–层状混源亚相–纹层状混源亚相–层状混源亚相–陆源层状灰质泥岩亚相–陆源块状灰质泥岩亚相;从东营凹陷南斜坡–东营凹陷北部陡坡带依次发育陆源块状灰质泥岩亚相–陆源层状灰质泥岩亚相–纹层状混源亚相–碳酸盐亚相–膏盐亚相–纹层状混源亚相–层状混源亚相–层状灰质泥岩亚相–块状灰质泥岩亚相。
Based on the data of core, thin section identification and X-ray diffraction, and on the basis of the previous understanding of the origin of shale components in upper Es4-lower Es3 in Dongying depression, according to the source and of sedimentary effect shale component, the sedimentary facies of shale in Dongying depression are divided into land source facies, mixed source facies and lacustrine source facies. According to the characteristics of sedimentary process, lithofacies and shale sedimentary structure, the land-source facies are further divided into layered calcareous mudstone subfacies and massive calcareous mudstone subfacies. The mixed source facies can be divided into laminated mixed subfacies and layered mixed source subfacies, while the lacustrine source facies can be divided into gypsum subfacies and carbonate rock subfacies. Shale sedimentary facies in upper Es4-lower Es3 in Dongying depression: lacustrine source gypsum subfacies-lacustrine source carbonate rock subfacies-laminated mixed facies-layered mixed source subfacies-laminated mixed source subfacies-layered mixed source subfacies-land source layered calcareous mudstone subfacies-land source massive calcareous mudstone subfacies from the bottom to the top; From the south slope zone to the northern steep slope zone of Dongying depression: land source massive calcareous mudstone subfacies-land source layered calcareous mudstone subfacies-laminated mixed facies-carbonate rock subfacies-Gypsum subfacies-laminated mixed source subfacies-layered mixed source subfacies-land source layered calcareous mudstone subfacies-land source massive calcareous mudstone subfacies.
[1] | 康仁华, 刘魁元, 赵翠霞, 等. 济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J]. 古地理学报, 2002, 4(4): 19-29. |
[2] | 王居峰. 济阳坳陷东营凹陷古近系沙河街组沉积相[J]. 古地理学报, 2005, 7(1): 45-58. |
[3] | 刘传虎, 韩宏伟. 济阳坳陷古近系红层沉积成藏主控因素与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S1): 63-70. |
[4] | 马中良, 曾溅辉, 王永诗, 等. 济阳坳陷不同沉积相砂体“相-势”耦合控藏作用[J]. 兰州大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 44(4): 9-13. |
[5] | 张善文, 纪友亮. 义东地区陡岸扇体沉积特征及相模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1997, 24(2): 41-45. |
[6] | 赵伟, 邱隆伟, 姜在兴, 等. 济阳坳陷民丰洼陷古近系沙河街组三段中亚段沉积相展布与演化[J]. 沉积学报, 2011, 29(2): 255-267. |
[7] | 姜再兴. 沉积学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2010. |
[8] | 吴靖, 姜在兴, 潘悦文, 等. 湖相细粒沉积模式——以东营凹陷古近系沙河街组四段上亚段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(9): 1080-1089. |
[9] | 张顺, 陈世悦, 谭明友, 等. 东营凹陷西部沙河街组三段下亚段泥页岩沉积微相[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 633-645. |
[10] | 蒋有录, 谭丽娟, 荣启宏, 等. 东营凹陷博兴地区油气成藏动力学与成藏模式[J]. 地质科学, 2003, 38(3): 323-331. |
[11] | 吴靖. 东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段细粒岩沉积特征与层序地层研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015. |
[12] | 宁方兴, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油赋存状态和可动性分析[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2015, 11(3): 1-5. |
[13] | 宁方兴. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(8): 905-914. |
[14] | 刘惠民, 张守鹏, 王朴, 等. 沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩石学特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6): 11-15. |
[15] | 张善文, 张林晔, 李政, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系页岩油气形成条件[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2012, 19(6): 1-5. |
[16] | 宁方兴, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 等. 济阳坳陷不同岩相页岩油赋存机理[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 185-195. |
[17] | 王红梅, 吴晓萍, 邱轩, 等. 微生物成因的碳酸盐矿物研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报, 2013, 40(1): 180-189. |
[18] | Boquet, E., Boronat, A. and Ramos-Cormenzana, A. (1973) Production of Calcite (Calcium Carbonate) Crystals by Soil Bacteria Is a General Phenomenon. Nature, 246, 527-529. https://doi.org/10.1038/246527a0 |
[19] | 金忠慧. 东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段细粒岩沉积环境研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2017. |
[20] | 王勇, 刘惠民, 宋国奇, 等. 济阳坳陷泥页岩细粒沉积体系[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(4): 395-410. |
[21] | 宁方兴, 王学军, 郝雪峰, 等. 东营凹陷细粒沉积岩岩相组合特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2020, 42(4): 55-65. |
[22] | 王勇, 张顺. 细粒沉积体系类型及特征——以济阳坳陷沙四上-沙三下亚段为例[J]. 地质论评, 2021, 67(S1): 135-136. |