|
大学生成人依恋类型、人际信任和爱情态度的调查分析
|
Abstract:
目的:调查大学生成人依恋类型、人际信任和爱情态度的总体状况。方法:为方便取样,采用亲密关系经历量表(ECR)、人际信任量表(ITS)和爱情态度量表(LAS)对广东省四所高校在校大学生进行问卷实测,回收有效问卷531份,有效率为95%。结果显示:1) 成人依恋在父母是否离异方面得分存在显著差异,父母离异的被试在依恋焦虑维度总体得分显著高于父母未离异被试(t = 4.263, p < 0.001),同时在依恋回避维度得分也显著高于父母未离异被试(t = 4.35, p < 0.001),成人依恋在不同性别、是否独生、是否恋爱、不同生源、不同专业、不同年级等变量上得分均无明显差异。2) 人际信任方面,非独生子女被试得分显著高于独生子女被试(t = 4.595, p < 0.001),父母未离异被试得分显著高于父母离异被试(t = 4.25, p < 0.001),恋爱被试得分显著高于未恋爱被试(t = 4.155, p < 0.001)。随着年级的提升被试人际信任总体得分呈递增趋势(F = 2.840, p < 0.01)。安全型成人依恋类型的被试在人际信任上得分明显高于其他类型(F = 6.069, p < 0.05)。3) 爱情态度方面,在爱情态度中男生在浪漫爱、游戏爱两个维度得分显著高于女生(p < 0.001),在占有爱维度,男生得分明显高于女生(p < 0.01),女生在友谊爱与现实爱维度得分显著高于男生(p < 0.05);非独生子女在爱情态度量表中友谊爱维度得分显著高于独生子女(p < 0.001)。4) 成人依恋类型在爱情态度上的差异,迷恋型成人依恋被试在浪漫爱、游戏爱、占有爱维度得分均高于其他依恋类型(p < 0.001),安全型依恋被试友谊爱维度得分显著高于其他依恋类型(F = 3.950, p < 0.001),奉献爱得分明显高于其他依恋类型(F = 4.333, p < 0.01)。结论:父母离异是影响大学生成人依恋类型和人际信任发展的重要因素,大学生人际信任和爱情态度随着其年龄的增长会持续发展。
Objective: To investigate the adult attachment style, interpersonal trust and love attitude of college students. Methods: For convenient sampling, the intimate Relationship Experience Scale (ECR), Intepersonal Trust Scale (ITS) and Love Attitude Scale (LAS) were used to survey the college students in four universities in Guangdong Province. 531 valid questionnaires were collected, with an effective rate of 95%. The results showed that: 1) The subjects whose parents were divorced had a significantly higher overall score in the dimension of attachment anxiety than those whose parents were not divorced (t = 4.263, p < 0.001), and a significantly higher score in the dimension of attachment avoidance than those whose parents were not divorced (t = 4.35, p < 0.001), there were no significant differences in adult attachment scores of different gender, single child, love, different students, different majors, different grades and other variables. 2) In terms of interpersonal trust, the scores of the non-only child subjects were significantly higher than that of the only child subjects (t = 4.595, p < 0.001), those whose parents were not divorced scored significantly higher than those whose parents were divorced (t = 4.25, p < 0.001), love subjects scored significantly higher than non-love subjects (t = 4.155, p < 0.001). With the improvement of grade, the overall score of interpersonal trust showed an increasing trend (F = 2.840, p < 0.01). Secure adult attachment type subjects scored significantly higher on interpersonal trust than other attachment types (F = 6.069, p < 0.05). 3) In the aspect of love attitude, male students scored
[1] | 曹杏娥(2011). 大学生成人依恋、自尊与爱情态度的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 北京: 北京林业大学. |
[2] | 杜宜展, 杨艳颖(2021). 家庭亲密度对大学生孤独感的影响: 人际信任的中介. 牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), (13), 63-74. |
[3] | 黄皓明(2019). 破裂与纠葛: 离异家庭子女的关系自我及其与家庭互动的叙事探究. 硕士学位论文, 南京: 南京大学. |
[4] | 简臻锐, 付琪琳(2014). 大学生人际信任及其影响因素研究. 大学生研究, (7), 94-98. |
[5] | 李彩娜, 党健宁, 王彩云(2014). 大学生情绪适应及其与依恋、情绪调节的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(9), 708-712. |
[6] | 李彩娜, 孙颖, 拓瑞, 刘佳(2016). 安全依恋对人际信任的影响: 依恋焦虑的调节效应. 心理学报, 48(8), 989-1001. |
[7] | 李同归, 加藤和生(2006). 成人依恋的测量: 亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版. 心理学报, 38(3), 399-400. |
[8] | 刘建权(2021). 大学生成人依恋、自尊与恋爱压力的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 南昌: 江西中医药大学. |
[9] | 刘晓明, 曾天德(2015). 大学生成人依恋与爱情态度: 自我效能感德中介作用. 安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版), (4), 133-137. |
[10] | 罗奕然(2021). 成人依恋与大学生社交焦虑的关系: 多重中介的作用. 硕士学位论文, 长沙: 湖南师范大学. |
[11] | 王海燕(2022). 高职院校单亲家庭学生亲子依恋与人际敏感的相关研究. 佳木斯职业学院学报, 38(11), 49-51. |
[12] | 吴昭仪, 吴丽娟(2005). 大学生的共依附与爱情态度之相关研究. 教育心理学报, 36(3): 241-263. |
[13] | 许学华, 麻丽丽, 李菲(2016). 大学生人际信任在成人依恋和人际困扰间的中介作用. 心理卫生评估, 30(11), 864-868. |
[14] | 杨洋, 白艳晶, 徐清刚(2008). 爱情态度量表(LAS)中文版在中国内地大学生中适用结果分析. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 29(23), 2824-2826. |
[15] | 张瑾(2018). 大学生成人依恋、人际信任与自我表露的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 开封: 河南大学. |
[16] | 张钦茹(2022). 大学生成人依恋与孤独感: 自我关怀的中介效应及干预研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东师范大学. |
[17] | 周琦(2017). 大学生人际信任水平与成人依恋、心理控制源的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 武汉大学. |
[18] | Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment Styles among Young Adults: A Test of a Four-Category Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 |
[19] | Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books. |
[20] | Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult Romantic Attachment: Theoretical Developments, Emerging Controversies, and Unanswered Questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132-154. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 |
[21] | Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 |
[22] | Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1986). A Theory and Method of Love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392-402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.392 |
[23] | Lee, J. A. (1973). The Colors of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving. New Press. |
[24] | Ravitz, P., Maunder, R., Hunter, J., Sthankiya, B., & Lancee, W. (2010). Adult Attachment Measures: A 25-Year Review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69, 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.08.006 |
[25] | Rotenberg, K. J., Addis, N., Boulton, M. J. et al. (2010). The Relation between Trust Beliefs and Loneliness during Early Childhood, Middle Childhood, and Adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1086-1100.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210374957 |
[26] | Rotter, J. B. (1967). A New Scale for the Measurement of Interpersonal Trust. Journal of Personality, 359, 651-665.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x |