Ion is probably the most underappreciated dialogue of Plato. Its conventional interpretation focuses on his criticism of artistic creation, that is viewed as the result of divine inspiration and occurs outside the artist’s awareness. I propose that Ion possesses an additional important value, as a form of social criticism: By disengaging the poet from the reciter, Plato targets specifically the latter, and his position in the society, but not the former that is spared from the philosopher’s criticism. Poet’s divine inspiration is just a metaphor for exceptional creativity which is used by the reciter for his personal benefits.
References
[1]
Dorter, K. (1973). The Ion: Plato’s Characterization of Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 32, 65-78.
[2]
Glucker, J. (2019). Plato’s Ion: Difficulties and Contradictions. Philosophia, 47, 943-958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0029-z
[3]
Hunter, R. (2011). Plato’s Ion and the Origins of Scholarship. In S. Matthaios, F. Montanari, & A. Rengakos (Eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts (pp. 27-40). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110254044.27
[4]
Jansen, S. (2015). Audience Psychology and Censorship in Plato’s Republic: The Problem of the Irrational Part. Epoché, 19, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche2014121729
[5]
Ladrilre, C. (1951). The Problem of Plato’s Ion. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 10, 26-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/426785
[6]
Landry, A. (2015). Inspiration and Technē: Divination in Plato’s Ion. Plato Journal, 14, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_14_6
[7]
Pappas, N. (1989). Plato’s Ion: The Problem of the Author. Philosophy, 64, 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100044727
[8]
Svoboda, T. (2021). Plato’s Ion as an Ethical Performance. In G. Hagberg (Ed.), Fictional Worlds and the Moral Imagination (pp. 3-18). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55049-3_1
[9]
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Free Press.
