|
应对方式在生活事件与高中生抑郁情绪之间的中介效应
|
Abstract:
探讨应对方式在生活事件与高中生抑郁情绪之间的中介作用,为高中生心理健康教育提供理论依据。方法:采用抑郁自评量表,应对方式问卷以及青少年生活事件量表对388名高中生进行问卷调查。结果:① 高中男生抑郁情绪的检出率为7.53%,高中女生抑郁情绪的检出率为12.17%,二者检出率的差异显著(P < 0.01);高中生抑郁水平不存在独生与否及家庭居住地上的差异(P > 0.05)。② 高中生遭遇的生活事件与抑郁水平呈显著正相关(P < 0.01);生活事件量表得分与应对方式问卷中的解决问题因子为显著负相关(P < 0.01),与自责、幻想、退避、合理化等因子显著正相关(P < 0.05);高中生抑郁量表总分与解决问题和求助因子显著负相关(P < 0.01),与自责、幻想、退避和合理化因子显著正相关(P < 0.01);③ 应对方式中的求助因子在生活事件与高中生抑郁情绪之间没有显著的中介效应(P > 0.05),而解决问题、自责、幻想、退避、合理化等因子在生活事件与高中生抑郁情绪之间的中介效应显著(P < 0.05),在总效应中所占的比例分别为26.0%、50.8%、20.0%、15.7%、19.3%。
Objective: To explore the mediating role of coping styles between life events and depression in high school students, and to provide theoretical basis for mental health education of them, a cross- sectional study was carried out. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted on total of 388 high school students using the Self-Rating Depression Scale, the Copying Style Questionnaire, and the Adolescents Self-Rating Life Events Check List. Results: 1) The detection rate of depression among high school males was 7.53%, and that of high school females was 12.17%, with significant differences (P < 0.01) between the two. There was no difference in the level of depression among high school students with or without an only child or of different family residences (P > 0.05). 2) Life events encountered by high school students were significantly and positively correlated with depression level (P < 0.01); Life events scale scores were significantly negatively correlated with the problem solving factor of the coping styles questionnaire (P < 0.01) and significantly positively correlated with the self-blame, fantasy, withdrawal, and rationalization factors (P < 0.05); total scores on the depression scale for high school students were significantly negatively correlated with the problem solving and help-seeking factors (P < 0.01) and significantly positively correlated with the self-blame, fantasy, withdrawal, and rationalization factors (P < 0.01). 3) Help-seeking factor of coping styles did not significantly mediate the relationship between life events and depression of high school students (P > 0.05), while problem solving, self-blame, fantasy, withdrawal, and rationalization had significant negative mediating effects between life events and depression of high school students (P < 0.05), with the proportion of the total effect being 26.0%, 50.8%, 20.0%, 15.7%, and 19.3%, respectively.
[1] | 刘贤臣, 刘连启, 杨杰, 柴福勋, 王爱祯, 孙良民, 赵贵芳, 马登岱(1997). 青少年生活事件量表的编制与信度效度测试. 山东精神医学, (1), 15-19. |
[2] | 马晓亮(2017). 高中生抑郁情绪与生活事件、应对方式的关系研究. 中国卫生产业, 14(16), 170-172.
https://doi.org/10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2017.16.170 |
[3] | 孙志颖, 刘忠慧, 徐渴, 冯宝佳, 符刚, 侯常春(2022). 2019-2020年天津市中学生抑郁现况及影响因素分析. 公共卫生与预防医学, 33(4), 152-155. |
[4] | 谭清宇, 朱玲, 彭朕磊, 向波, 张涛(2021). 应对方式与心理弹性对大学生负性情绪的影响. 职业与健康, 37(8), 1113-1116+1121. https://doi.org/10.13329/j.cnki.zyyjk.20210413.002 |
[5] | 温忠麟, 方杰, 谢晋艳, 欧阳劲樱(2022). 国内中介效应的方法学研究. 心理科学进展, 30(8), 1692-1702. |
[6] | 姚崇, 游旭群, 刘松, 周晨琛, 惠琪(2019). 大学生生活事件与抑郁的关系: 有调节的中介作用. 心理科学, 42(4), 935-941. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20190424 |
[7] | 张红亚, 王智勇, 刘启贵, 燕春婷, 雷芳, 王润南, 宋桂荣(2022). 中学生抑郁症状的影响因素分析. 现代预防医学, 13(4), 651-655. |
[8] | 朱本娈(2021). 高中生应对方式与抑郁的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 青岛: 青岛大学.
https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=3VGQGmUhR6FWlzTOHCU9rYQ0TVSShdmDRei66thKZA2Q_ChR-rzXRas4kL2uwhDxrPkKpsZEXOxzp3fR
3JQeKJq_KljPRBCGpzI0wHhUNLe3WYWK7X5BDg
==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS |
[9] | 朱伟(2023). 大学生自尊、生活事件、应付方式与抑郁的相关性研究. 心理月刊, (1), 95-97.
https://doi.org/10.19738/j.cnki.psy.2023.01.027 |
[10] | 左莹莹(2013). 高中生生活事件、社会支持、应对方式与抑郁情绪的关系研究. 硕士学位论文, 成都: 四川师范大学. |
[11] | Elklit, A. (1996). Coping Styles Questionnaire: A Contribution to the Validation of a Scale for Measuring Coping Strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 809-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00123-7 |
[12] | Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). An Interactive Calculation Tool for Mediation Tests. |
[13] | Zung, W. W. K., & Zung, E. M. (1986). 7/Use of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale in the Elderly. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1300/J018v05n01_07 |