|
论催收非法债务罪中的“情节严重”
|
Abstract:
《刑法修正案(十一)》规定了催收非法债务罪,并且罪状中有规定“情节严重的”,但何谓本罪中的“情节严重”,目前暂无规范性文件予以指导,容易导致本罪扩张适用。“情节严重”应当是客观的违法要素。本罪的“情节严重”应当侧重于手段的违法性,与催收的债务性质、数额以及催收的主体没有实质性联系。具体而言,本罪中的“情节严重”是指暴力、胁迫、跟踪等行为的情节严重。进一步讲,当手段涉及以下要素时,宜认定为本罪的情节严重:“多次催讨”、“形成、利用恶势力犯罪集团进行催讨”、“携带、使用凶器进行催讨”、“造成他人多处轻微伤或轻伤以上后果的”、“造成他人自杀、精神异常的”、“严重扰乱他人生活、工作秩序的”、“在公共场所暴力催讨的”。
The Criminal Law Amendment (XI) provides for the crime of collecting illegal debts, and the crime provides for “aggravated circumstances”, but there is no normative document to guide what constitutes “aggravated circumstances” in this crime, which can easily lead to the expansion of the application of this crime. “Aggravated circumstances” should be the objective element of the violation. The “aggravating circumstances” of this crime should focus on the illegality of the means, and there is no substantial connection with the nature and amount of the debt collected and the subject of the collection. Specifically, “aggravating circumstances” in this crime refers to the aggravating circumstances of violence, coercion, stalking and other acts. Further, when the means involves the following elements, it is appropriate to find the aggravating circumstances of this crime: “repeated collec-tion”, “forming or using a criminal group of evil forces to collect”, “carrying or using a murder weapon to collect”, “causing multiple minor injuries or minor injuries or more to another person”, “causing another person to commit suicide or mental abnormality”, “seriously disrupting the life or work order of another person”, “violent collection in public places”.
[1] | 付立庆. 论积极主义刑法观[J]. 政法论坛, 2019, 37(1): 99-111. |
[2] | 张明楷. 催收非法债务罪的另类解释[J]. 政法论坛, 2022, 40(2): 3-17. |
[3] | [美]道格拉斯·胡萨克. 过罪化及刑法的限制[M]. 姜敏, 译. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2015: 4. |
[4] | 高铭暄, 马克昌. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社、北京大学出版社, 2015: 482. |
[5] | 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第六版. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2021. |
[6] | 张明楷. 犯罪构成体系与构成要件要素[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2010. |
[7] | 刘守芬, 方文军. 情节犯及相关问题研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2003, 24(1): 7-9. |
[8] | 陈兴良. 规范刑法学(上册) [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2008. |
[9] | 张庆立. “情节严重(恶劣)”的法律解释[J]. 法律方法, 2021, 33(1): 330-345. |
[10] | 张平寿. 催收非法债务罪的限缩适用与路径选择[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(1): 158-176. |
[11] | 劳东燕. 刑法修正案(十一)条文要义: 修正提示、适用指南与案例解读[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2021. |
[12] | 王飞跃. 论我国刑法中的“次” [J]. 云南大学学报(法学版), 2006(1): 14-18. |
[13] | 陈兴良. 套路贷犯罪研究[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2021, 27(5): 5-27. |
[14] | 张明楷. 简论“携带凶器抢夺” [J]. 法商研究(中南政法学院学报), 2000(4): 89-95. |
[15] | 徐昕. 私力救济的正当性及其限度——一种以社会契约论为核心的解说[J]. 法学家, 2004(2): 94-101. |
[16] | 汪鹏. 场域性立法背景下催收非法债务罪的规范构造[J]. 上海大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(1): 91-104. |
[17] | 刘军凯. 催收非法债务罪的法教义学分析[J]. 河北公安警察职业学院学报, 2022, 22(1): 62-65. |
[18] | 黎宏. 刑法学各论[M]. 北京: 中国法律出版社, 2016. |
[19] | 崔天亮, 王利荣. “催收非法债务罪”的教义学分析[J/OL]. 宜宾学院学报: 1-9.
http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1630.Z.20220106.1812.005.html, 2022-04-15. |