全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

紧急制动下驾驶员的坐姿仿真变化及损伤研究
Research on Driver’s Sitting Posture Simulation Change and Injury under Emergency Braking

DOI: 10.12677/MOS.2023.122142, PP. 1523-1538

Keywords: 紧急制动,乘坐姿态,正面碰撞,多目标优化;Emergency Braking, Sitting Posture, Frontal Collision, Multi-Objective Optimization

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文建立了车辆约束系统模型,以NAIS统计的座椅角度数据为基础,在FRB和MPDB两种碰撞工况下,通过LS-DYNA利用THOR假人模型仿真对比分析三种初始驾驶坐姿在紧急制动下乘员的运动学响应及假人头部、颈部和胸部的损伤风险。最后采用NSGA-II算法的多目标优化方法求解乘员座椅部分位置的最优参数值。结果表明:以综合假人评价指标WIC值最小为目标获得数据是座椅角度100.1?,踏板到坐垫前端水平距离0.48 m,方向盘中心到靠背上端水平距离0.66 m,座椅坐垫高度0.18 m。这组数据将为进一步提高乘员座椅的正面碰撞防护能力和未来主被动安全一体化的开发策略提供参数依据。
This paper establishes restraint system model of vehicle, based on the seat angle data of NAIS sta-tistical; under the two impact conditions of FRB and MPDB, LS-DYNA uses the THOR dummy model to simulate and compare the kinematics response of passengers in three initial driving sitting posi-tions under emergency braking and the injury risk of the dummy head, neck and chest. Finally, the multi-objective optimization method of NSGA-II algorithm is used to solve the optimal values of some position parameters of the passenger seat. The results show that the data obtained with the objective of minimizing the damage value of the integrated dummy are the seat angle of 100.1?, the horizontal distance from the pedal to the front end of the seat cushion with 0.48 m, the horizontal distance from the steering wheel center to the upper end of the backrest of 0.66 m, and the seat cushion height of 0.18 m. This set of data will provide parameter basis for further improving the frontal collision protection capability of the passenger seat and the development strategy of the in-tegration of active and passive safety in the future.

References

[1]  Carlsson, S. and Davidsson, J. (2011) Volunteer Occupant Kinematics during Driver Initiated and Autonomous Braking When Driving in Real Traffic Environments. Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Calgary, 19-22 June 2011, 125-136.
[2]  Osth, J., Olafsdóttir, J.M., Davidsson, J., et al. (2013) Driver Kinematic and Muscle Responses in Braking Events with Standard and Reversible Pre-Tensioned Restraints: Validation Data for Human Models. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 57, 145-158.
https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-22-0001
[3]  Mcmurry, T.L., Poplin, G.S., Shaw, G., et al. (2018) Crash Safety Concerns for Out-of-Position Occupant Postures: A Look Towards Safety in Highly Automated Vehicles. Traffic Injury Prevention, 12, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1458306
[4]  Kang, M., Lee, I., Jung, J., et al. (2021) Motion Responses by Occupants in Out-of-Seat Positions during Autonomous Emergency Braking. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 23, 217-231.
[5]  任立海, 李星月, 覃祯员, 等. 基于模糊控制的汽车自动紧急制动乘员离位仿真分析研究[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 35(4): 32-38.
[6]  文箫. 紧急制动工况下主动安全带对乘员安全的影响研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆理工大学, 2019.
[7]  李月明, 王鹏翔, 张毅, 习波波, 杨海燕. 自动紧急制动对约束系统保护功能影响的研究[J]. 汽车技术, 2022(10): 16-23.
[8]  Antona, J., Ejima, S. and Zama, Y. (2011) Influence of the Driver Condi-tions on the Injury Outcome in Front Impact Collisions. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2, 2788-2790.
[9]  胡远志, 曾必强, 谢书港. 基于LS-DYNA和HyperWorks的汽车安全仿真与分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2011.
[10]  陈勇. 行人和自行车交通事故中头部动力学响应和损伤机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2010.
[11]  中国汽车技术研究中心. C-NCAP管理规则(2021年版) [R]. 天津: 中国汽车技术研究中心.
http://www.c-ncap.org.cn/cncap-regulation-2021.pdf

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133