全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论《民法典》与《公司法(修订草案)》对企业绿色责任的规制与衔接——以维修权为切入点
On the Regulation and Connection between the Civil Code and the Company Law (Revised Draft) —Taking the Maintenance Right as the Entry Point

DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2023.123168, PP. 1214-1222

Keywords: 企业绿色责任,民法典,公司法,维修权,电子废弃资源
Corporate Green Responsibility
, Civil Code, Company Law, Maintenance Right, Electronic Waste Resources

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

企业绿色责任制度的目的是为了人类的永续发展,《民法典》与《公司法(修订草案)》均有对企业绿色责任的相关规定。目前,我国对企业绿色责任的理论基础已经形成,但由于缺乏事前监管,最终导致当前企业绿色责任治理失序,电子污染加剧。本文以维修权为切入点,通过对维修权的实施与阻碍,结合我国背景分析,发现企业绿色责任与知识产权保护的边界不清晰,企业绿色责任与产品供应链的法律衔接不通畅的原因。因此从实体规范与程序规范的规制、知识产权的维护等几个方面来看,《公司法》应当树立创新导向型的基础规则,构建绿色信用为核心的公司法制度设计,在法律衔接中应注重专门立法规制,明确“节约资源”涵盖内容,设置企业绿色责任与知识产权的界限,并加大法律宣传力度,进而提高全社会绿色责任意识。
The purpose of the enterprise green responsibility system is for the sustainable development of human beings. The Civil Code and the Company Law (Revised Draft) both have relevant provisions on the enterprise green responsibility. At present, the theoretical basis for China’s enterprise green responsibility has been formed, but due to the lack of prior supervision, the current enterprise green responsibility governance disorder, and the electronic pollution intensifies. This paper takes the right of maintenance as the starting point, through the implementation and obstruction of the right of maintenance, combined with the background analysis of China, we find the reasons why the boundary between enterprise green responsibility and intellectual property protection is not clear, and the legal connection between enterprise green responsibility and product supply chain is not smooth. So from the entity specification and procedure regulation, the maintenance of intellectual property rights, company law should set up the basis of innovative oriented rules, build green credit as the core of the company law system design, should pay attention to special regulations in legal cohesion, clear “resource saving” covers content, set up the boundaries of enterprise green responsibility and intellectual property rights, intensify legal publicity, and improve the green responsibility consciousness of the whole society.

References

[1]  王斌会, 伍桑妮. 环境规制、绿色技术创新与经济高质量发展的影响研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2022, 41(10): 143-151.
[2]  马密, 黄荣, 常国慧. 《民法典》绿色原则的司法适用: 实践样态与优化路径——以《民法总则》第9条的司法适用为基点[J]. 法律适用, 2020(23): 49-57.
[3]  杨翠柏, 李宗恒. 绿色原则融入民事裁判的理解与适用[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2020, 35(3): 52-58.
[4]  宁清同. 论《民法典》之节约资源义务[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(3): 232-244.
[5]  赵磊. 《民法典》对公司法体系的规范作用[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2022(5): 78-88.
[6]  王道平, 张可, 周玉. 政府奖惩下考虑回收率动态随机的闭环供应链微分博弈[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-15[2022-10-23].
https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1138,.
[7]  Murthy, V. and Ramakrishna, S. (2022) A Review on Global E-Waste Management: Urban Mining towards a Sustainable Future and Circular Economy. Sustainability, 14, Article No. 647.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020647
[8]  Forti, V., Balde, C.P., Kuehr, R. and Bel, G. (2020) The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, Flows, and the Circular Economy Potential. United Nations University/United Nations Institute for Training and Research, International Telecommunication Union, and International Solid Waste Association, Bonn, Geneva and Rotterdam. http://ewastemonitor.info
[9]  樊勇. 私人自治的绿色边界——《民法总则》第9条的理解与落实[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2019, 22(2): 116-123.
[10]  肖海军. 论《公司法》第5条第1款的实施——以《公司法》修改为视角[J]. 北方法学, 2021, 15(3): 37-48.
[11]  郭富青. 中国公司法的功能再定位与价值导向矫正[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 24(5): 20-31.
[12]  姜晶花. 环境伦理背景下的企业绿色责任[J]. 学习与探索, 2013(11): 91-95.
[13]  黄晓晔, 易文彬. 生态文明视域下企业生态责任研究[J]. 企业经济, 2022, 41(10): 85-91.
[14]  王志鑫. 电子废弃物回收治理的现实困境与制度应因——基于社会共治视角的分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2022(8): 161-171.
[15]  沈臻懿 .欧盟立法: 物尽其用减少电子垃圾[J]. 检察风云, 2022(14): 56-57.
[16]  Pariatamby, A. and Victor, D. (2013) Policy Trends of E-Waste Management in Asia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Man-agement, 15, 411-419.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0136-7
[17]  US Geological Survey (2021) National Minerals Information Center Lithium Statistics and Information. http://www.usgs.gov/centers/nmic/lithium-statistics-and-information
[18]  崔罗肖, 胡启智, 李蒙, 吴家龙, 范慧中, 陈思思, 任宗玲. 清远电子垃圾拆解区土壤重金属污染空间分布特征及风险评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2022, 41(10): 2200-2211.
[19]  周浩. 洋垃圾的现状及其治理[J]. 生态经济, 2017, 33(8): 10-13.
[20]  刘迪. 论维修权与知识产权之协调[J]. 政治与法律, 2021(9): 145-160.
[21]  徐静婷. 论智能设备的维修权[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2023, 42(1): 53-59.
[22]  Yeh, B.T. (2016) Repair, Modification, or Resale of Software-Enabled Consumer Electronic Devices: Copyright Law Issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington DC.
[23]  Gomulkiewicz, R.W. (2022) Considering a Right to Repair Software. Berkeley Technology Law Journal. (Forthcoming)
[24]  Ehgartner, U. and Hirth, S. (2019) The Right to Repair and Endangered Practices. Discover Society, 75.
[25]  沈臻懿. 欧盟立法: 物尽其用减少电子垃圾[J]. 检察风云, 2022(14): 56-57.
[26]  Eurostat (2018) Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/waste/key-waste-streams/weee
[27]  Svensson, S., Richter, J.L., Maitre-Ekern, E., et al. (2018) The Emerging “Right to Repair” legislation in the EU and the Going Green—CARE INNOVATION 2018, Vienna, 26-29 November 2108, 27-29.
[28]  MacAneney, M. (2018) If It Is Broken, You Should Not Fix It: The Threat Fair Repair Legislation Poses to the Manufacturer and the Consumer. St. John’s Law Review, 92, 331-359.
[29]  李建伟, 李亚超. 企业社会责任原则的商法逻辑[J]. 求是学刊, 2021, 48(5): 109-119.
[30]  Hartline, D. and Mossoff, A. (2011) State Right-to-Repair Laws Need to Respect Federal Copyright Laws: A Constitutional, Legal, and Policy Assessment. Hudson Institute, Washington DC.
[31]  景宇, 王前. 从负责任创新视角看技术设计中的“有计划报废制” [J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2022, 38(4): 36-41.
[32]  赵谦, 余月. 主体、属性与实践: 公益诉讼诉前程序要义考略[J]. 河北法学, 2021, 39(2): 28-42.
[33]  赵敏, 赵国浩. 企业绿色责任、企业行为模式与全要素生产率[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 54(5): 86-96.
[34]  肖静, 曾萍. 数字化能否实现企业绿色创新的“提质增量”?——基于资源视角[J/OL]. 科学学研究: 1-19[2022-10-25].
https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20220905.001
[35]  贺剑. 绿色原则与法经济学[J]. 中国法学, 2019(2): 110-127.
[36]  Leonidou, L.C., Kvasova, O., Leonidou, C.N. and Chari, S. (2013) Business Unethicality as an Impediment to Consumer Trust: The Moderating Role of Demographic and Cultural Characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 397-415.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1267-9
[37]  侯东德, 韦雅君. 生态型公司法的理论证成及制度实现[J]. 当代法学, 2022, 36(5): 120-132.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133