|
浅析我国公司法人格否认制度
|
Abstract:
我国公司法经历了最初的法律规范文件到现在已进行多次修改的《公司法》,极大的推动了我国公司法人格否认制度的发展。但由于经济领域日新月异,仅两个原则性条文已经无法满足实践需要,使得该制度陷入司法困境和学术争议,具体表现为立法形式不完善、主体范围不清晰、一人公司规定不健全和举证责任分配不明确这四个方面。为了更好的改善我国市场经济环境和维护经济稳定,本文通过梳理公司法理论的起源发展及研究我国目前公司法人格否认制度现状,提出有效性的建议,力求完善公司法人格否认制度。
China’s company law has experienced the initial legal normative documents and has been revised for many times, which has greatly promoted the development of the denial of corporate personality system in China. However, due to the rapid changes in the economic field, only two principled provisions can not meet the needs of practice, which makes the system fall into judicial difficulties and academic disputes, which are embodied in four aspects: imperfect legislative form, unclear subject scope, imperfect provisions of one-man company and unclear distribution of burden of proof. In order to better improve China’s market economic environment and maintain economic stability, this paper combs the origin and development of the theory of company law, studies the current situation of the denial of corporate personality system in China, puts forward effective suggestions, and tries to improve the denial of corporate personality system.
[1] | 法律出版社法规中心. 新编公司法全解[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014. |
[2] | 黄来纪, 陈学军, 李志强. 完善公司人格否认制度研究[M]. 北京: 中国民主法制出版社, 2012. |
[3] | 刘兰芳. 公司法前沿理论与实践[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2009. |
[4] | 雷兴虎, 刘斌. 论公司法人格否认诉求主体适用范围之拓宽[J]. 政法学刊2010(4): 5-10. |
[5] | 胡改蓉. “资本显著不足”情形下公司法人格否认制度的适用[J]. 法学评论, 2015(3): 163-172. |
[6] | 沈贵明. 论公司资本登记制改革的配套措施跟进[J]. 法学, 2014(4): 98-107. |
[7] | 梁小尹, 冯理. 完善我国“揭开公司面纱”制度的思考——以美国Bartle案为视角[J]. 遵义师范学院学报, 2013(6): 8-13. |