全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

轻罪治理背景下的少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策运行机制研究
Research on the Operational Mechanism of Criminal Judicial Policy of “Less Arrest, More Prosecution and More Custody” under the Background of Misdemeanor Governance

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.112057, PP. 399-406

Keywords: 轻罪治理,少捕,慎诉,慎押
Misdemeanor Management
, Catch Less, Cautiously Sue,Cautiousness

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

随着系列刑法修正案的不断出台,以及司法实践中占绝大多数的轻刑化犯罪,均预示着我国已迎来“轻罪时代”,犯罪结构逐渐由重罪向轻罪发生转移。因此我们应重视对于轻罪的治理研究,贯彻落实少捕慎诉慎押的刑事司法政策。该政策以充分发挥检察职能为纽带,减少批捕率;审慎提起诉讼,对于可提可不提的不提起诉讼;谨慎对待羁押,进行羁押必要性审查,充分保障人权。从实践出发,明确少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策的内涵、功能及价值意义,寻求多方面落实机制,促进诉源治理,助推国家治理体系和治理能力现代化,为国家调整轻罪治理方略提供进路。
With the continuous introduction of a series of amendments to the Criminal Law, and the majority of light crimes in judicial practice, it indicates that China has ushered in the “era of misdemeanors”, and the criminal structure has gradually shifted from serious crimes to misdemeanors. Therefore, we should attach importance to the research on the governance of misdemeanors, and implement the criminal justice policy of “fewer arrests, more prosecutions and more custody”. The policy takes the full play of procuratorial functions as the link to reduce the arrest rate; take care to file a lawsuit, and do not file a lawsuit for those that may not be mentioned; treat custody with caution, review the necessity of custody, and fully protect human rights. Proceeding from practice, we should clarify the connotation, function and value significance of the criminal judicial policy of “fewer arrests, more prosecutions and more detentions”, seek a multifaceted implementation mechanism, promote the source of litigation governance, boost the modernization of the national governance system and governance capacity, and provide a way for the country to adjust its misdemeanor governance strategy.

References

[1]  卞建林, 钱程. 少捕慎诉慎押的实践检视与发展完善[J]. 人民检察, 2022(5): 10-14.
[2]  卢建平, 叶良芳. 重罪轻罪的划分及其意义[J]. 法学杂志, 2005(5): 22-24.
[3]  卢建平. 轻罪时代的犯罪治理方略[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 51-66.
[4]  刘述光. 论我国刑事强制措施适用存在的问题与对策[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2008.
[5]  楼洁. “枫桥经验”视野下检察机关“少捕慎诉”工作之探析[J]. 法制与社会, 2019(33): 165-166.
[6]  王守安. 落实“少捕慎诉慎押”刑事司法政策助推社会治理现代化[J]. 人民检察, 2021(Z1): 100-102.
[7]  韩旭. 能动落实认罪认罚从宽制度促进诉源治理[N]. 检察日报, 2022-03-25(03).
[8]  王渊, 王小飞. 从“少捕慎诉慎押”刑事司法政策看刑事检察理念的转变——专访中国政法大学终身教授陈光中[J]. 人民检察, 2021(Z1): 63-65.
[9]  邓铁军, 卢玉平. “检察蓝”少捕慎诉慎押化解纠纷促和谐[N]. 广西法治日报, 2022-01-08(001).
[10]  赵桔水, 王婉露. 以涉案人员分类处理机制贯彻少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策[J]. 中国检察官, 2022(2): 18-20.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133