全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

诉源治理视角下行政调解效力的反思与重塑
Reflection and Reconstruction of Administrative Mediation Effectiveness from the Perspective of Source of Action Governance

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.112056, PP. 392-398

Keywords: 诉源治理,行政调解,法律效力,反思与重塑
Source of Action Governance
, Administrative Mediation, Legal Effect, Reflection and Remolding

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

行政调解是行政职能活动下的纠纷化解制度,其权威性、专业性、灵活性的制度优势能够促进纠纷源头预防与化解,实现诉源治理效能。而制度的法律效力是其优势充分发挥的体现,也是其发展的关键。囿于当下我国行政调解制度尚且缺乏实现定纷止争的基础性效力以及实质性化解的保障性效力。对此,本文从确定力、约束力、强制执行力的层面审视在民事争议中我国行政调解效力的发展现状,进而提出明确行政调解的确定力,加重当事人履行协议的约束力,强化行政机关督促实质性解决纠纷的义务,以当事人申请与司法审查相结合作为强制执行力的生效条件,以此充分发挥制度的治理活力,提高诉源治理功效。
Administrative mediation is a dispute resolution system under the administrative function activities. Its authoritative, professional and flexible institutional advantages can promote the prevention and resolution of the source of disputes and achieve the effectiveness of the source of litigation governance. The legal effect of the system is the embodiment of its advantages and the key to its development. Limited by the current administrative mediation system in China, there is still a lack of basic effectiveness to settle disputes and safeguard effectiveness to resolve substantive disputes. In this regard, this paper examines the current development of the effectiveness of administrative mediation in civil disputes from the perspective of certainty, binding force and enforcement force, and then proposes to clarify the certainty of administrative mediation, increase the binding force of the parties to perform the agreement, strengthen the obligation of the administrative organ to urge the substantive resolution of disputes, and take the combination of the parties’ application and ju-dicial review as the effective condition of enforcement force, so as to give full play to the governance vitality of the system, Improve the effectiveness of source of litigation governance.

References

[1]  [日]棚濑孝雄. 纠纷的解决与审判制度[M]. 王亚新, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2004: 52.
[2]  黄学贤, 孟强龙. 行政调解几个主要问题的学术梳理与思考——基于我国理论研究与实践发展的考察[J]. 法治研究, 2014(2): 85-95.
[3]  莫于川. 我国行政调解程序法律制度发展路径选择[J]. 南都学坛(人文社会科学学报), 2014(2): 70-77.
[4]  许玉镇, 李洪明. 在调解中寻求平衡——试论当代中国的行政调解[J]. 行政与法, 2003(1): 28-31.
[5]  莫于川. 行政调解法治论: 以北京市行政调解制度创新为研究重点[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 168.
[6]  黄忠顺. 调解的共通性效力[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2014(3): 136-147.
[7]  章志远, 刘利鹏. 我国行政调解制度的运作现状与发展课题[J]. 求是学刊, 2013(5): 78-84.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133