全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

算法背景下智能招聘歧视的法律规制
Legal Regulation of Intelligent Recruitment Discrimination in the Context of Algorithms

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.112046, PP. 320-328

Keywords: 人工智能招聘,算法歧视,算法规制
Artificial Intelligence Recruitment
, Algorithmic Discrimination, Algorithmic Law Regulation

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

在算法时代下,有时候不是人在主动的歧视,而是一个自动系统在编程的时候有意或无意的进行歧视。这类的歧视是在计算机系统的人智能算法决策中产生的,虽然计算机系统本身没有意识,但它产生出的决策却构成了歧视。在就业市场招聘程序通过人工智能算法决策参与到招聘的过程中,其虽简化了招聘的流程提升了招聘效率,但在某种情况下也可能构成对应聘者的就业歧视。本文将涉及这些问题,提出应建立算法歧视审查机制应设立专门的算法审查部门对算法问题进行规制。
In the algorithmic era, sometimes it is not a human being who is actively discriminating, but an au-tomated system that is programmed to discriminate, either consciously or unconsciously. This type of discrimination is generated in the human-intelligent algorithmic decision making of a computer system, and although the computer system itself is not conscious, the decisions it generates constitute discrimination. In the employment marketplace recruitment processes are involved in the recruitment process through artificial intelligence algorithmic decisions, which streamline the recruitment process and improve recruitment efficiency, but in some cases may also constitute employment discrimination against candidates. This paper will address these issues and propose that a review mechanism for algorithmic discrimination should be established and a special algorithmic review department should be set up to regulate algorithmic issues.

References

[1]  徐语聪. 王露颐: 招聘进入AI时代解决传统招聘诸多痛点[J]. 数据, 2021(4): 30-36.
[2]  张成岗. 人工智能时代: 技术发展、风险挑战与秩序重构[J]. 南京社会科学, 2018(5): 42-52.
[3]  Ajunwa, I. (2019) An Auditing Im-perative for Automated Hiring Systems. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34.
[4]  蓝亭亭. 招聘算法歧视的法律规制[J]. 武汉交通职业学院学报, 2022, 24(4): 80-85+108.
[5]  程建华, 刘菲菲. AI-HR招聘的算法歧视及应对[J]. 常州工学院学报(社会科学版), 2022, 40(4): 123-128.
[6]  Citron, D.K. (2007) Technological due Process. Washington University Law Review, 85, 1249-1313.
[7]  侯玲玲, 王超. 人工智能: 就业歧视法律规制的新挑战及其应对[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 36(1): 1-16+33.
[8]  韩大元, 王建学. 基本权利与宪法判例[M]. 第2版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 35
[9]  阎天. 重思中国反就业歧视法的当代兴起[J]. 中外法学, 2012, 24(3): 560-577.
[10]  全国人大委员会法制工作委员会国家法行政法室. 中华人民共和国劳动法释义[M]. 北京: 中国工人出版社, 1994.
[11]  Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S. and Kirchner, L. (2016) Machine Bias. In: Mar-tin, K., Ed., Ethics of Data and Analytics, Auerbach Publications, New York, 254-264.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003278290-37
[12]  齐延平. 论人工智能时代法律场景的变迁[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2018, 36(4): 37-46.
https://doi.org/10.16290/j.cnki.1674-5205.2018.04.026
[13]  周佑勇. 行政法的正当程序原则[J]. 中国社会科学, 2004(4): 115-124.
[14]  何海波. 司法判决中的正当程序原则[J]. 法学研究, 2009, 31(1): 124-146.
[15]  杜仪方. 公私协作中国家责任理论的新发展——以日本判决为中心的考察[J]. 当代法学, 2015, 29(3): 39-49.
[16]  王莹. 算法侵害类型化研究与法律应对: 以《个人信息保护法》为基点的算法规制扩展构想[J]. 法制与社会发展,2021, 27(6): 133-153
[17]  冯珏. 自动驾驶汽车致损的民事侵权责任[J]. 中国法学, 2018(6): 109-132
[18]  苏宇. 算法规制的谱系[J]. 中国法学, 2020(3): 165-184.
[19]  刘宪权. 人工智能时代刑事责任与刑罚体系的重构[J]. 政治与法律, 2018(3): 89-99.
[20]  张凌寒. 《个人信息保护法(草案)》中的平台算法问责制及其完善[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2021(1): 36-46
[21]  Lynch, M.K. (1990) The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: Comments on The Agency And Its Role In Employment Discrimination Law. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 20, 89-104.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133