全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Embedded Fusion: The Certainty of Blockchain Technology Complements the High Degree of Probability of Legal Presumption

DOI: 10.4236/chnstd.2023.122010, PP. 103-112

Keywords: Blockchain Technology, Legal Presumption, Certainty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper aims to analyze the technical basis and theoretical rationality of the Peoples Court Online Litigation Rules of China regarding the provision that blockchain-stored data has the effect of presumption of authenticity. The presumption is a legal technique to resolve facts proving difficulties. The traditional presumption of certainty is based on naive rules of thumb, while the presumption of certainty in information technology is based on the objective foundation of technological certainty. This paper adopts the research methods of case study and law analysis, analyzes in detail the characteristics of data certainty, rule certainty, and identity certainty of blockchain technology and argues that the certainty of blockchain technology has a complementary effect on the high probability of legal presumption.

References

[1]  Al Hamrani, N. R., & Al Hamrani, A. R. (2021). People of Determination (Disabilities) Recruitment Model Based on Blockchain and Smart Contract Technology. Technology and Investment, 12, 136-150.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ti.2021.123008
[2]  Beijing Court’s Top Ten Cases of Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in 2021.
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1731919308319298481&wfr=spider&for=pc
[3]  Brookshear, J. G. (2011). Computer Science: An Overview (11th ed., p. 388). Translated by Liu Yi et al., Posts and Telecommunications Press.
[4]  Chinese Academy of Engineering Releases Application Case of a Judicial Alliance Chain.
http://www.zqrb.cn/jrjg/hlwjr/2021-08-03/A1627979903638.html
[5]  MIIT (2016). China Blockchain Technology and Application Development White Paper.
http://www.caict.ac.cn/english/research/whitepapers/202101/P020210127494158921362.pdf
[6]  Shi, P. P., et al. (2019). The Evidence Value of Blockchain Technology (p. 3). Procuratorate Daily, April 17.
[7]  Strong, J. W. (2004). McCormick on Evidence (5th ed. p. 682). Translated by Tang Weijian et al., China University of Political Science and Law Press.
[8]  Taguchi, M. (2000). Criminal Procedure Law (p. 29). Translated by Liu Di et al., Law Press.
[9]  Understanding and Application of “People’s Court Online Litigation Rules”.
http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-309561.html
[10]  Wu, J., & Tran, N. K. (2018). Application of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Energy Systems: An Overview. Sustainability, 10, Article 3067.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093067
[11]  Yang, J. W. (2021). Blockchain Evidence Rule System. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 3, 91.
[12]  Yu, G. et al. (2019). The Challenge and Prospect of Distributed Data Management Techniques in Blockchain Systems. Chinese Journal of Computers, 44, 28-53.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133