全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

LDH、PLR、NLR、SII及D-二聚体对子宫肉瘤的联合诊断价值分析
Analysis of Combined Diagnostic Value of LDH, PLR, NLR, SII and D-Dimer in Uterine Sarcoma

DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.132167, PP. 1209-1215

Keywords: 子宫肉瘤,D-二聚体,乳酸脱氢酶,中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR),血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR), 系统性免疫性炎症指数(SII)

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:探讨术前乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、系统性免疫性炎症指数(SII)水平及D-二聚体对子宫肉瘤的联合诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2018年12月至2021年12月在青岛大学附属医院经手术治疗的63例子宫肉瘤患者的临床资料。按1:2比例选取同期经手术病理证实的126例子宫肌瘤患者作为子宫肌瘤组。统计分析所有患者术前一般资料,1周内外周血血常规、D-二聚体、LDH结果,计算NLR、PLR、SII值,比较各指标数值在两组间的差异。检测LDH、D-二聚体、NLR、PLR和SII5个指标及其联合检测对子宫肉瘤的诊断价值。结果:子宫肉瘤组外周血LDH、D-二聚体、NLR、SII值水平均高于子宫肌瘤组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。但子宫肉瘤组PLR水平均小于子宫肌瘤组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。血清LDH、D-二聚体、NLR、PLR和SII诊断子宫肉瘤的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.664、0.746、0.851、0.597、0.597,五指标联合诊断的AUC为0.949,其灵敏度和准确度均高于单项检测,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:术前LDH、D-二聚体、NLR、PLR和SII对子宫肉瘤的早期诊断及鉴别诊断具有临床实用价值。其联合检测优于单项检测,具有较好的临床诊断价值。
Purpose: To investigate the combined diagnostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), neutro-phil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune inflammatory in-dex (SII) and D-dimer in uterine sarcoma. Methods: The clinical data of 63 patients with uterine sarcoma who underwent surgical treatment in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from December 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. 126 patients with hysteromyo-ma confirmed by surgery and pathology during the same period were selected as the hysteromyo-ma group in a ratio of 1:2. Preoperative general data of all patients, peripheral blood routine, D-dimer and LDH results within 1 week were statistically analyzed, and the values of NLR, PLR and SII were calculated to compare the differences of each index value between the two groups. LDH, D-dimer, NLR, PLR and SII were detected and their combined detection value in the diagnosis of uterine sarcoma was compared. Results: The levels of LDH, D-dimer, NLR and SII in peripheral blood of uterine sarcoma group were higher than those of uterine fibroids group, with statistical signifi-cance (P < 0.05). However, PLR levels in the uterine sarcoma group were lower than those in the uterine fibroids group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of serum LDH, D-dimer, NLR, PLR and SII in the diagnosis of uterine sarcoma were 0.664, 0.746, 0.851, 0.597 and 0.597, respectively, and the AUC of the combined diagnosis of the five indicators was 0.949, which showed higher sensitivity and ac-curacy than that of single detection. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Preoperative LDH, D-dimer, NLR, PLR and SII have clinical value in the early diagnosis and differen-tial diagnosis of uterine sarcoma. Its combined detection is superior to single detection and has good clinical diagnostic value.

References

[1]  陈思蕾, 王光伟, 赵万成, 杨清. 子宫肉瘤的术前诊断[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2019, 38(3): 257-260.
[2]  袁木发, 王捷鹏, 费素娟, 外周血NLR、PLR、MLR和CEA对胃癌的诊断价值[J]. 江苏医药, 2022, 48(1): 40-44.
[3]  徐燕, 等. 术前外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值和血小板与淋巴细胞比值对宫颈癌患者预后的评估价值[J]. 现代实用医学, 2022, 34(1): 46-49, 封4.
[4]  梁丽红, 王维, 杨芳. 肺癌患者血清淋巴细胞–单核细胞比值、中性粒细胞–淋巴细胞比值及血小板–淋巴细胞比值变化及对预后的预测价值[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2022, 19(2): 126-130.
[5]  赵夏丰, 刘庆峰, 杨小华. 血栓分子标志物在恶性肿瘤患者中的检测价值[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2022, 33(3): 417-419.
[6]  Nishigaya, Y., Kobayashi, Y., Matsuzawa, Y., et al. (2019) Diagnostic Value of Combination Serum Assay of Lactate Dehydrogenase, D-Dimer, C-Reactive Protein for Uterine Leiomyosar-coma. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 45, 189-194.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13792
[7]  周虎, 等. 术前外周血标志物对子宫肉瘤的联合诊断价值分析[J]. 安徽医学, 2020, 41(7): 751-754.
[8]  中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会. 子宫肉瘤诊断与治疗指南(2021年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2021, 31(6): 513-519.
[9]  陈楠楠, 戴德. 慢性炎症在恶性肿瘤中的作用研究进展[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(14): 169-172.
[10]  冯淑杰. 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对子宫肉瘤诊断和预后的意义分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
[11]  游盛俊, 等. 术前NLR、CA125及血浆D-二聚体在子宫内膜癌诊断中的临床价值[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2022, 13(6): 76-79.
[12]  马玉, 葛华. 血清CA125、HE4及D-二聚体联合T淋巴细胞亚群在诊断上皮性卵巢癌中的临床价值[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2022, 9(6): 37-41.
[13]  刘英超. 晚期恶性肿瘤患者凝血功能指标检测的临床意义[J]. 实用检验医师杂志, 2022, 14(1): 9-12.
[14]  张凯, 李树建, 陈小乐. 血浆D-二聚体水平在非小细胞肺癌患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 医学综述, 2022, 28(5): 1032-1035.
[15]  马亚宁, 李艳. 子宫颈癌、子宫癌、卵巢癌患者血D二聚体的差异及临床意义[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2021, 27(5): 823-824, 827.
[16]  严毅军, 郁文燕, 雷卫勇. 血清CA125及LDH在子宫肉瘤妇女中的检测价值分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2019, 30(8): 1022-1025.
[17]  于晓妮. 乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)在子宫肌瘤及子宫肉瘤患者外周血及病理组织中的表达研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2016.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133