中立帮助行为主观限制可罚说的实践展开——以虚假诉讼罪为例
The Practice of Subjective Restriction Punishable Theory of Neutral Helping Behavior —Taking the Fraud Litigation as an Example

中立帮助行为可罚性限缩不应局限于客观面。客观限制可罚说者主张的实质化制造风险理论、假定的替代原因论、相当性说或限定帮助说均存在缺陷，无法限缩中立帮助行为的可罚范围。基于我国刑事立法和司法实践，主观限制可罚说具有采纳的必要性和合理性。中立帮助行为人的主观故意的审查需要立足于帮助犯的故意内容，确认正犯与共犯存在意思联络的同时，强调中立帮助行为人确定地认识到其中立帮助行为对正犯行为的促进作用。
The narrowing of the punishability of neutral helping behavior should not be limited to the objective side. The substantive risk-making theory, the hypothetical alternative cause theory, the equivalence theory or the limited aid theory advocated by the objectively restricting punishable theorists are all flawed, and cannot limit the scope of punishment for neutral helping behaviors. Based on our country’s criminal legislation and judicial practice, it is necessary and reasonable to adopt the theory of subjective limitation of punishment. The review of the subjective intention of the neutral helper needs to be based on the intentional content of the helper. While confirming the intentional connection between the principal and the accomplice, it is emphasized that the neutral helper must recognize the role of his neutral help on the principal’s behavior.