全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

环境不作为量表的中文版修订及信效度检验
The Chinese Version of Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers Scale and Reliability and Validity Test

DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.131047, PP. 381-388

Keywords: 环境不作为,信度,效度
Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers
, Reliability, Validity

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:修订国外环境不作为量表(DIPB),检验其在中国文化背景下的信度和效度。方法:对中国340名大学生施测,最终形成了23题的中文版DIPB量表,共包含五个维度:无须改变、人际压力、动力不足、缺乏知识和沉没成本。结果:信度分析表明,Cronbach α系数为0.91。验证性因素分析显示该量表结构效度良好(x2/df = 1.79, CFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.06)。结论:环境不作为量表的各项信效度指标良好,可以作为中国文化情境下,探究阻碍人们做出亲环境行为的心理因素的参考工具。
Objective: Revising English version of Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers Scale (DIPB) to Chinese version, and testing its reliability and validity in Chinese Cultural Background. Methods: A formal Chinese Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers Scale with 23 items was composed of five dimensions: no need to change, interpersonal pressure, lack of motivation, lack of knowledge and sunk costs, by collecting 340 Chinese College students’ data. Results: The revised Chinese version of DIPB Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.91. Confirmed factor analysis indicated that the scale has good construct validity (x2/df = 1.79, CFI = 0.95, NFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.06). Conclusion: The Chinese version of DIPB has good reliability and validity, which can be used as tool to explore the barriers of people’s pro-environment behavior in Chinese Cultural Background.

References

[1]  陈思静, 濮雪丽, 朱玥, 汪昊, 刘建伟(2021). 规范错觉对外出就餐中食物浪费的影响: 心理机制与应对策略. 心理学报, 53(8), 15.
[2]  顾文武(2020). 实施社区垃圾分类的困境与对策研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 华东政法大学.
[3]  何叶(2019). 上海居民生活垃圾分类投放的现状及影响因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 上海: 上海交通大学.
[4]  洪大用, 范叶超(2013). 公众对气候变化认知和行为表现的国际比较. 社会学评论, (4), 3-15.
[5]  唐辉, 杨海莺(2022). 论“五位一体”总体布局中的生态文明建设——学习习近平生态文明思想. 社会主义研究, (5), 9-16.
[6]  王钟秀, 董文杰(2016). 中国公众对气候变化的认知. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 52(6), 714-721.
[7]  杨冠宇, 李淑敏(2021). 环境自我认同对大学生低碳行为的影响. 心理与行为研究, 19(3), 410-416.
[8]  战东森(2016). 城市政府环境治理动力机制研究. 硕士学位论文, 天津: 天津商业大学.
[9]  张琪, 陈婉, 陈煊铭(2017). 大学生环境价值观与绿色出行之间的关系——以共享单车为例. 心理技术与应用, 5(11), 695-701.
[10]  朱慧(2017). 环境知识、风险感知与青年环境友好行为. 当代青年研究, (5), 66-72.
[11]  Alfonso Gutierrez, L. S., & Prieto Pati?o, L. E. (2022). Adaptación de la escala Dragones de Inacción Barreras Psicológicas (DIPB) en población colombiana. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 25, 183-202.
https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2022.25.1.12
[12]  Choi, M. S., & Kim, Y. (2005). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: An Examination of Collectivism, Environmental Concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 592-599.
[13]  Chong, H., & Verma, R. (2013). Hotel Sustainability: Financial Analysis Shines a Cautious Green Light. Cornell Hospitality Reports, 13, 4-13.
[14]  Frick, J., Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Environmental Knowledge and Conservation Behavior: Exploring Prevalence and Structure in a Representative Sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597-1613.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
[15]  Gifford, R. (2011). The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. The American Psychologist, 66, 290-302.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
[16]  Hagen, B., Middel, A., & Pijawka, D. (2016). European Climate Change Perceptions: Public Support for Mitigation and Adaptation Policies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26, 170-183.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1701
[17]  Han, H., & Kim, Y. (2010). An Investigation of Green Hotel Customers’ Decision Formation: Developing an Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 659-668.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.01.001
[18]  Helm, S. V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M. A., Curran, M. A., & Craig, Z. R. (2018). Differentiating Environmental Concern in the Context of Psychological Adaption to Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 48, 158-167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012
[19]  Lacroix, K., Gifford, R., & Chen, A. (2019). Developing and Validating the Dragons of Inaction Psychological Barriers (DIPB) Scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 9-18.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.001
[20]  Marlon, J. R., Bloodhart, B., Ballew, M. T., Rolfe-Redding, J., Roser-Renouf, C., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2019). How Hope and Doubt Affect Climate Change Mobilization. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 20.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00020
[21]  Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35-41.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1080
[22]  Qi, D., & Roe, B. E. (2016). Household Food Waste: Multivariate Re-gression and Principal Components Analyses of Awareness and Attitudes among US Consumers. PLOS ONE, 11, Article ID: 159250.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159250
[23]  Schmidt, K. (2016). Explaining and Promoting Household Food Waste-Prevention by an Environmental Psychological Based Intervention Study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 111, 53-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.006
[24]  Teng, C.-C., & Chang, J.-H. (2014). Effects of Temporal Distance and Related Strategies on Enhancing Customer Participation Intention for Hotel Eco-Friendly Programs. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 92-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.012

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133