柏拉图诗哲之争的理性和诗性关系比较
A Comparison of the Relationship between Rationality and Poetics in Plato’s Poetic Philosophical Debate

柏拉图在《理想国》驱逐了诗人，但在实际上，在柏拉图身上又有着诗哲融合的矛盾特点，诗哲之争在超越的意义上来说不仅仅是诗和哲学两种文体的论争，更在于两种言说方式以及其背后的思维方式的区分和交融，即：感性诗性思维和理性逻辑思维。两种思维方式在描述世界整一性的立足点上是不同的，但精神旨归是同一的。我们要在区分中看到两者的联系和趋近的部分，从而更好地理解柏拉图关于诗哲之分与之合的辨析目的。
Plato expelled the poet in The Republic, but in fact, Plato has the contradictory feature of poetry philosophy integration. In the sense of transcendence, the dispute between poetry and philosophy is not only the dispute between poetry and philosophy, but also the difference and integration of two ways of speaking and the way of thinking behind it, namely: perceptual poetic thinking and rational logical thinking. The two modes of thinking have different footholds in describing world integrity, but their spiritual aims are the same. We should see the connection and approaching part of the two in the distinction, so as to better understand Plato’s goal of distinguishing between poetry and philosophy.