|
历史书写的建构主义:主体性与客观性之间
|
Abstract:
本文从学界对“历史”这个概念的不同理解出发,以历史自身存在的一种“主客、虚实”间的张力为线索,围绕“何谓历史,为何书写历史”、“历史书写的史料”、“历史连续性的想象与建构”、“历史书写语言”等问题进行探讨,尝试从“史实与虚构、断裂与连续、书写中的主客观因素”等多个维度来呈现历史,以期对历史以及历史书写的复杂性内涵有更深刻地理解和认识。
Based on the analysis of scholars’ different understandings of the concept of “history”, this paper attempts to delve into such issues as “what is history, why should we write history”; “historical materials for writing of history”; “imaging and construction of historical continuity”; “language issue in writing of history”, by exploring both the connection and tension between subjectivity and objectivity, and between reality and fiction reflected in history. Moreover, this paper aims at offering a deeper understanding of the complex connotation of history and writing of history through presenting history from multiple dimensions such as “historical facts and fiction, fracture and continu-ity, subjective and objective factors in writing of history”.
[1] | 海登·怀特, 著. 元史学: 十九世纪欧洲的历史想象[M]. 陈新, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2004. |
[2] | 涂成林. 历史阐释中的历史事实和历史评价问题——基于马克思唯物史观的基本理论和方法[J]. 中国社会科学, 2017(8): 4-23. |
[3] | 米歇尔·德·塞尔托, 著. 历史书写[M]. 倪复生, 译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2012. |
[4] | Schrag, Z. (2021) The Princeton Guide to Historical Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton & Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691215488 |
[5] | 黄克武. 反思现代: 近代中国历史书写的重构[M]. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2021. |
[6] | 陈建守, 著. 史家的诞生: 探访西方史学殿堂的十扇窗[M]. 戴丽娟, 等, 译. 台北: 时英出版社, 2008. |
[7] | 柯林伍德, 著. 历史的观念[M]. 何兆武, 张文杰, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1997. |
[8] | Gottschalk, L. (1950) Understanding History: A Primer of Historical Method. Alfred A. Knopf., New York. |
[9] | 李哲. “边地”历史书写中的“自我”想象及其限度——以冯良《西南边》为例[J]. 民族文学研究, 2021, 39(1): 31-38. |