全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

预防未成年人犯罪的治理体系构建
Construction of a Governance System for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.111019, PP. 130-136

Keywords: 未成年人,犯罪现状,犯罪诱因,刑事责任年龄,预防措施
Minors
, Crime Status, Causes of Crime, Age of Criminal Responsibility, Preventive Measures

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

近年来,由于未成年人在犯罪上呈现出熟练化、冷漠化的新特点,不断引发人们对刑事责任年龄是否予以修正的争论。对此《刑法修正案十一》做出审慎回应:将刑事责任年龄进行合理下调,不仅体现出刑法与时俱进的立法观念,同时也是司法机关向社会公众提交一份满意答卷的体现。但不断的降低刑事责任年龄是不是解决预防未成年人犯罪的唯一途径?我们应该揭露出未成年人犯罪背后的真正诱因:家庭、学校、司法机关综合治理的缺陷。因此只有通过分析当下未成年人犯罪的现状,找出未成年实施犯罪的根源,从家庭、学校、司法出发,以教育为目的,惩罚为手段构建多方位的解决体系。
In recent years, due to the new characteristics of juvenile delinquency, such as proficiency and indifference, people have been debating whether the age of criminal responsibility should be amended. In response to the Eleventh Amendment to the Criminal Law, a prudent response was made: the reasonable reduction of the age of criminal responsibility not only reflects the legislative concept that criminal law keeps pace with the times, but also reflects the judicial organs’ submission of a satisfactory answer to the public. But is constantly lowering the age of criminal responsibility the only way to prevent juvenile delinquency? We should reveal the real inducement behind juvenile delinquency: the defects in the comprehensive management of family, school and judiciary. Therefore, only by analyzing the current situation of juvenile delinquency, can we find out the root causes of juvenile delinquency, and build a multidimensional solution system from the perspective of family, school and justice, with education as the purpose and punishment as the means.

References

[1]  张垚, 冯玉婷. 《刑法修正案(十一)》后时代的低龄未成年人犯罪预防与治理路径[J]. 石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学), 2022, 36(1): 54-63.
[2]  阴熠. 湖北省未成年人寻衅滋事罪防控机制实证研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018.
[3]  马泽华. 论刑事法定责任年龄降低[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2017.
[4]  俞彪. 新经济下中小学校法制教育存在的问题与对策[J]. 现代商贸工业, 2007, 19(4): 139-140.
https://doi.org/10.19311/j.cnki.1672-3198.2007.04.083
[5]  吴晓燕. 瑞典、美国中小学性教育的比较研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都师范大学, 2013.
[6]  王曲. 未成年人刑事政策研究[J]. 河南社会科学, 2017, 25(4): 74-78.
[7]  霍尔, 诺德贝. 荣格心理学入门[M]. 冯川, 译. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社, 1987: 129-130.
[8]  宫金光. 盗窃罪既遂未遂问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2011.
[9]  法在我身边. 央视《法治深壹度》强制报告制度: 强势保护未成年人(下) [EB/OL]. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1677729734468204554&wfr=spider&for=pc, 2020-09-30.
[10]  欧元雕, 胡金六月, 余雷. 论法制教育的预防未成年人犯罪功能[J]. 安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 23(1): 111-114.
https://doi.org/10.19747/j.cnki.1009-2463.2014.01.023
[11]  吴建忠. 3-12岁儿童家庭性教育现状及对策研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南师范大学, 2005.
[12]  冷剑丽. 瑞典中学性教育的实践及启示[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2006.
[13]  孟炜. 比较法视野下完善我国未成年人刑事责任年龄制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海社会科学院, 2017.
[14]  冯雪菲. 论合适成年人参与制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2012.
[15]  苏梦杰. 我国历次刑法修正案中犯罪化问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 保定: 河北大学, 2017.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133