全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

AMS14C测年对西安市长安区关家村古滑坡时代的约束
AMS14C Dating Constraints on the Age of Guanjiacun Ancient Landslide in Chang’an District of Xi’an City, China

DOI: 10.12677/AG.2022.1212154, PP. 1586-1595

Keywords: 关家村古滑坡,滑坡时代,AMS14C测年,黄土台塬斜坡带
Guanjiacun Ancient Landslide
, Landslide Age, AMS14C Dating, The Margin Slope Zone of the Loess Tableland

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

关家村古滑坡是分布于渭河地堑南部神禾塬黄土台塬边缘斜坡带的大型黄土古滑坡,其发育于马兰–午城黄土层内,具有典型的椅圈状地貌形态,发育早晚2个滑坡体,早晚滑坡体之间发育25~30 m宽的崩塌碎裂黄土带,显示滑坡经历了早期滑坡、中期崩塌和晚期滑坡3阶段的发育过程。通过对关家村古滑坡后缘洼地4件样品的加速质谱14C (AMS14C)测年,结果表明关家村古滑坡发生于32390 cal BP~1702 cal BP之间,结合对修建于滑坡体上的古寺庙年代考证,得出关家村古滑坡发生于1700~1800 cal BP的认识,为黄土高原第四纪滑坡时代分布研究提供了新资料。
The Guanjiacun ancient landslide is a large ancient loess landslide distributed in the margin slope zone of the Shenheyuan loess tableland in the southern Weihe graben. It is developed in the Malan-Wucheng loess layer and has a typical chair-ring landform. Two landslide bodies of early and late stage are developed, and a 25~30 m wide collapse and cataclastic loess zone is developed between the early and late landslide bodies. It shows that the landslide has experienced three stages of development: early landslide, middle collapse and late landslide. Through the Accelerated Mass Spectrometry 14C (AMS14C) dating of four samples from the depression at the trailing edge of the Guanjiacun ancient landslide, the results show that the Guanjiacun ancient landslide occurred between 32390 cal BP and 1702 cal BP. Combined with the age of the ancient temple built on the landslide body, the understanding that the Guanjiacun ancient landslide occurred between 1700 and 1800 cal BP was obtained, which provided new data for the study of the Quaternary landslide age distribution on the Loess Plateau.

References

[1]  雷祥义. 黄土高原地质灾害与人类活动[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001.
[2]  王念秦, 张倬元. 黄土滑坡灾害研究[M]. 兰州: 兰州大学出版社, 2005.
[3]  李同录, 龙建辉, 李新生. 黄土滑坡发育类型及其空间预测方法[J]. 工程地质学报, 2007, 15(4): 500-505.
[4]  李宝田, 刘文红. 白鹿塬黄土滑坡发育类型及成因机制研究[J]. 中外公路, 2021, 41(S2): 39-43.
[5]  胡胜, 邱海军, 王宁练, 等. 地形对黄土高原滑坡的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(11): 2697-2709.
[6]  孙萍萍, 张茂省, 贾俊, 等. 中国西北黄土区地质灾害调查进展[J]. 工西北地质, 2022, 55(3): 96-107.
[7]  李磊, 龙许冲, 张中俭, 等. 黄土高原滑坡灾害研究综述[J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2021, 23(4): 1-11.
[8]  彭建兵, 王启耀, 庄建琦, 等. 黄土高原滑坡灾害形成动力学机制[J]. 地质力学学报, 2020, 26(5): 714-730.
[9]  张安良, 种瑾, 米丰收. 渭河断陷南缘断裂带新活动特征与古地震[J]. 华北地震科学, 1992, 10(4): 55-62.
[10]  陕西省地震局. 秦岭北缘活动断裂带[M]. 北京: 地震出版社, 1996.
[11]  刘克新, 丁杏芳, 傅东坡, 等. 北京大学AMS14C国际比对样品测量[J]. 第四纪研究, 2007, 27(3): 469-473.
[12]  肖爱芳, 吴资龙, 黎敦朋. AMS14C测年对福建政和蛙岩古堰塞湖形成与溃坝时代的约束[J]. 福建地质, 2021, 40(4): 259-265.
[13]  商志文, 王福, 李建芬, 等. AMS14C测年揭示的渤海湾沿海低地第Ⅱ海相层年龄(Ⅱ) [J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(10): 1607-1613.
[14]  陈天源, 刘斯文, 赖忠平, 等. 巴丹吉林沙漠湖泊年轻沉积物14C测年初步研究[J]. 盐湖研究, 2017, 25(2): 60-66.
[15]  杨银科, 彭建兵, 刘聪. 滑坡年代学研究方法应用进展[J]. 灾害学, 2015, 30(2): 133-137.
[16]  彭建兵, 张骏, 苏生瑞, 等. 渭河地堑活动断裂与地质灾害[M]. 西安: 西北大学出版社, 1992.
[17]  Zhang, A., Yang, Z., Zhong, J. and Mi, F. (1995) Characteristics of Late Quaternary Activity along the Southern Border Fault Zone of Weihe Graben Basin. Quaternary International, 25, 25-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/1040-6182(94)P3715-K
[18]  孙建忠. 黄土学[M]. 西安: 西安地图出版社, 2005.
[19]  陕西省地质调查院. 陕西省地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2015.
[20]  盖海龙. 西安市长安区滑坡崩塌灾害孕育规律及易发性分区评价研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015.
[21]  Reimer, P.J., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., et al. (2013) IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0 - 50, 000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon, 55, 1869-1887.
https://doi.org/10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947
[22]  Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T.F. (1993) Modeling Atmospheric 14C Influences and 14C Ages of Marine Samples to 10, 000 BC. Radiocarbon, 35, 137-189.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133