全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

论人工智能刑事主体地位之否定
On the Negation of the Criminal Subject Status of Artificial Intelligence

DOI: 10.12677/OJLS.2023.111002, PP. 7-12

Keywords: 人工智能,刑事责任主体,刑罚
Artificial Intelligence
, Subject of Criminal Responsibility, Penalty

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

对于是否应当赋予人工智能刑事责任主体地位在学者间展开了论战。本文从赋予人工智能刑事责任主体地位的前提、资格、目的与风险四个方面进行审视,认为是否能够真正实现强人工智能尚且无法知晓、其意志不具有社会规范属性、对其实施刑罚无法达到刑罚目的以及存在颠覆人类主体地位、不受约束等风险,其刑事主体地位不适格。涉及人工智能的犯罪行为所主要发生的财务管理、自动驾驶及医疗领域的刑事责任的承担需视情况而定。
There is a debate among scholars on whether artificial intelligence should be given the status of subject of criminal responsibility. This paper examines the premise, qualification, purpose and risk of giving artificial intelligence the status of subject of criminal responsibility, and believes that whether it can truly realize strong artificial intelligence is still unknown, its will does not have the attribute of social norms, its punishment cannot achieve the purpose of punishment, and there are risks of subverting the human subject status and not being constrained, and its criminal subject status is not eligible. The criminal responsibility in the fields of financial management, automatic driving and medical care, which mainly occur in criminal acts involving artificial intelligence, shall depend on the situation.

References

[1]  Arruda, A. (2016) An Ethical Obligation to Use Artificial Intelligence? An Examination of the Use of Artificial Intelli-gence in Law and the Model Rules of Professional Responsibility. American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 40, 443-458.
[2]  刘艳红. 人工智能法学研究的反智化批判[J]. 东方法学, 2019(5): 119-126.
[3]  刘宪权. 对人工智能法学研究“伪批判”的回应[J]. 法学, 2020(1): 3-14.
[4]  闫坤如. 人工智能的道德风险及其规避路径[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 47(2): 40-47.
[5]  陈洪兵. 人工智能刑事主体地位的否定及实践展开——兼评“反智化批判”与“伪批判”之争[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2021(6): 92-98.
[6]  孙道萃. 人工智能对传统刑法的挑战[N]. 检察日报, 2017-10-22(003).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133