全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
投递稿件

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

CO2 Demand-Supply Coordination in Photosynthesis Reflecting the Plant-Environment Interaction: Extension and Parameterization of Demand Function and Supply Function

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2023.142017, PP. 220-245

Keywords: Photosynthesis, Gas Exchange Measurement, Demand Function, Supply Function, Laisk Method, Light Response Curve

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Photosynthesis consists of a biochemical process named demand and a CO2 diffusion process named supply function. The intersection (Ci, An) at equal to the demand function and the supply function reflects a steady state of the plant subjected to the environment. The intersections of these demand-supply functions under different photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) can be fitted to a regression line (names DSF) in which slope (ΔAn/ΔCi) can be defined as dsf. We found that DSF information was embedded in both Laisk method (CO2 response curve (A/Ci) measured at three sub-saturated PARs, and their intersections were used to estimate daytime respiration (Rd), and CO2 compensation point (Ci*) and light response curve measurements, which could be used to estimate dsf values. This study investigated the relationship between dsf and the parameters related to the biochemical process and the CO2 diffusion process of photosynthesis. The results showed that dsf was negatively correlated with gs, apparent carboxylation efficiency, and apparent quantum yield. This suggests that DSF may coordinate the influence of environmental conditions (light, CO2 and water) on photosynthesis in the biochemical and CO2 diffusion process. Moreover, dsf was independent of gas exchange measurement conditions and showed species specificity. In conclusion, we speculated that dsf seems to be a comprehensive parameter that might be related to the intrinsic adaptation mechanism of plants to environmental conditions. We proposed an auxiliary line perpendicular to the DSF and used it to improve the stability of Ci*？ and Rd

 References

[1]  Wu, J.-T., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Huang, X.-C. and Ma, F. (2020) Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Effect Growth and Photosynthesis of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex. Steudel under Copper Stress. Plant Biology, 22, 62-69.
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13039
[2]  Kong, R.S., Way, D.A., Henry, H.A.L. and Smith, N.G. (2022) Stomatal Conductance, Not Biochemistry, Drives Low Temperature Acclimation of Photosynthesis in Populus balsamifera, Regardless of Nitrogen Availability. Plant Biology, 24, 766-779.
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13428
[3]  Wang, Y., Xu, S., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Wang, N., He, X. and Chen, W. (2021) Responses of Growth, Photosynthesis and Related Physiological Characteristics in Leaves of Acer ginnala Maxim. to Increasing Air Temperature and/or Elevated O3. Plant Biology, 23, 221-231.
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13240
[4]  Rasool, S.G., Gulzar, S., Hameed, A., Edwards, G.E., Khan, M.A. and Gul, B. (2019) Maintenance of Photosynthesis and the Antioxidant Defence Systems Have Key Roles for Survival of Halopeplis perfoliata (Amaranthaceae) in a Saline Environment. Plant Biology, 21, 1167-1175.
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13033
[5]  Xu, Y., Fu, X., Sharkey, T.D., Shachar-Hill, Y. and Walker, B.J. (2021) The Metabolic Origins of Non-Photorespiratory CO2 Release during Photosynthesis: A Metabolic Flux Analysis. Plant Physiology, 186, 297-314.
https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab076
[6]  Busch, F.A. (2013) Current Methods for Estimating the Rate of Photorespiration in Leaves. Plant Biology, 15, 648-655.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00694.x
[7]  Buckley, T.N., Vice, H. and Adams, M.A. (2017) The Kok Effect in Vicia faba Cannot Be Explained Solely by Changes in Chloroplastic CO2 Concentration. New Phytologist, 216, 1064-1071.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14775
[8]  Xiong, D., Douthe, C. and Flexas, J. (2018) Differential Coordination of Stomatal Conductance, Mesophyll Con-Ductance, and Leaf Hydraulic Conductance in Response to Changing Light across Species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41, 436-450.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13111
[9]  Voelker, S.L., Brooks, J.R., Meinzer, F.C., Anderson, R., Bader, M.K.-.-F., Battipaglia, G., Becklin, K.M., Beerling, D., Bert, D., Betancourt, J.L., Dawson, T.E., Domec, J.-C., Guyette, R.P., Körner, C., Leavitt, S.W., Linder, S., Marshall, J.D., Mildner, M., Ogée, J., Panyushkina, I., Plumpton, H.J., Pregitzer, K.S., Saurer, M., Smith, A.R., Siegwolf, R.T.W., Stambaugh, M.C., Talhelm, A.F., Tardif, J.C., Van de Water, P.K., Ward, J.K. and Wingate, L. (2016) A Dynamic Leaf Gas-Exchange Strategy Is Conserved in Woody Plants under Changing Ambient CO2: Evidence from Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Paleo and CO2 Enrichment Studies. Global Change Biology, 22, 889-902.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13102
[10]  Duursma, R.A. (2015) Plantecophys—An R Package for Analysing and Modelling Leaf Gas Exchange Data. PLOS ONE, 10, e0143346.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143346
[11]  Busch, F.A. (2020) Photorespiration in the Context of Rubisco Biochemistry, CO2 Diffusion and Metabolism. The Plant Journal, 101, 919-939.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14674
[12]  Fernández-Marín, B., Gulías, J., Figueroa, C.M., Iñiguez, C., Clemente-Moreno, M.J., Nunes-Nesi, A., Fernie, A.R., Cavieres, L.A., Bravo, L.A., García-Plazaola, J.I. and Gago, J. (2020) How Do Vascular Plants Perform Photosynthesis in Extreme Environments? An Integrative Ecophysiological and Biochemical Story. The Plant Journal, 101, 979-1000.
https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14694
[13]  Farquhar, G.D., von Caemmerer, S. and Berry, J.A. (1980) A Biochemical Model of Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation in Leaves of C3 Species. Planta, 149, 78-90.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386231
[14]  Yin, X., Busch, F.A., Struik, P.C. and Sharkey, T.D. (2021) Evolution of a Biochemical Model of Steady-State Photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment, 44, 2811-2837.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14070
[15]  Zhou, H., Xu, M., Pan, H. and Yu, X. (2015) Leaf-Age Effects on Temperature Responses of Photosynthesis and Respiration of an Alpine Oak, Quercus aquifolioides, in Southwestern China. Tree Physiology, 35, 1236-1248.
https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv101
[16]  Edlyn, B.E., Duursma, R.A., Eamus, D., Ellsworth, D.S., Prentice, I.C., Barton, C.V.M., Crous, K.Y., De Angelis, P., Freeman, M. and Wingate, L. (2011) Reconciling the Optimal and Empirical Approaches to Modelling Stomatal Conductance. Global Change Biology, 7, 2134-2144.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02375.x
[17]  Lamba, S., Hall, M., Räntfors, M., Chaudhary, N., Linder, S., Way, D., Uddling, J and Wallin, G. (2018) Physiological Acclimation Dampens Initial Effects of Elevated Temperature and Atmospheric CO2 Concentration in Mature Boreal Norway Spruce. Plant, Cell & Environment, 41, 300-313.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13079
[18]  Pastore, M.A., Lee, T.D., Hobbie, S.E. and Reich, P.B. (2020) Interactive Effects of Elevated CO2, Warming, Reduced Rainfall, and Nitrogen on Leaf Gas Exchange in Five Perennial Grassland Species. Plant, Cell & Environment, 43, 1862-1878.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13783
[19]  Lambers, H., Chapin, F.S. and Pons, T.L. (2008) Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer, New York.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3
[20]  Laĭsk, A.K., Nedbal, L. and Govindjee (2009) Photosynthesis in Silico: Understanding Complexity from Molecules to Ecosystems. Springer, Dordrecht.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9237-4
[21]  Taiz, L., Zeiger, E., Møller, I.M. and Murphy, A. (2018) Plant Physiology and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[22]  Walker, B.J., Skabelund, D.C., Busch, F.A. and Ort, D.R. (2016) An Improved Approach for Measuring the Impact of Multiple CO2 Conductances on the Apparent Photorespiratory CO2 Compensation Point through Slope-Intercept Regression. Plant, Cell & Environment, 39, 1198-1203.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12722
[23]  Tcherkez, G., Gauthier, P., Buckley, T.N., Busch, F.A., Barbour, M.M., Bruhn, D., Heskel, M.A., Gong, X.Y., Crous, K.Y., Griffin, K., Way, D., Turnbull, M., Adams, M.A., Atkin, O.K., Farquhar, G.D. and Cornic, G. (2017) Leaf Day Respiration: Low CO2 Flux but High Significance for Metabolism and Carbon Balance. New Phytologist, 216, 986-1001.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14816
[24]  Yin, X., Sun, Z., Struik, P.C. and Gu, J. (2011) Evaluating a New Method to Estimate the Rate of Leaf Respiration in the Light by Analysis of Combined Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Measurements. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3489-3499.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err038
[25]  Bloomfield, K.J., Prentice, I.C., Cernusak, L.A., Eamus, D., Medlyn, B.E., Rumman, R., Wright, I.J., Boer, M.M., Cale, P., Cleverly, J., Egerton, J.J.G., Ellsworth, D.S., Evans, B.J., Hayes, L.S., Hutchinson, M.F., Liddell, M.J., Macfarlane, C., Meyer, W.S., Togashi, H.F., Wardlaw, T., Zhu, L. and Atkin, O.K. (2019) The Validity of Optimal Leaf Traits Modelled on Environmental Conditions. New Phytologist, 221, 1409-1423.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15495
[26]  Bellasio, C., Beerling, D. J., and Griffiths, H. (2016) An Excel Tool for Deriving Key Photosynthetic Parameters from Combined Gas Exchange and Chlorophyll Fluorescence: Theory and Practice. Plant, Cell & Environment, 39, 1180-1197.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12560
[27]  Green, J.K. and Keenan, T.F. (2022) The Limits of Forest Carbon Sequestration. Science, 376, 692-693.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo6547
[28]  Weber, J.A., Tenhunen, J.D. and Lange, O.L. (1985) Effects of Temperature at Constant Air Dew Point on Leaf Carboxylation Efficiency and CO2 Compensation Point of Different Leaf Types. Planta, 166, 81-88.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397389
[29]  Teramura, A.H., Sullivan, J.H. and Ziska, L.H. (1990) Interaction of Elevated Ultraviolet-B Radiation and CO2 on Productivity and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Wheat, Rice, and Soybean. Plant Physiology, 94, 470-475.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.470
[30]  Song, X., Zhou, G., Xu, Z., Lv, X. and Wang, Y. (2016) A Self-Photoprotection Mechanism Helps Stipa baicalensis Adapt to Future Climate Change. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 25839.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25839
[31]  Li, Y.-T., Li, Y., Li, Y.-N., Liang, Y., Sun, Q., Li, G., Liu, P., Zhang, Z.-S and Gao, H.-Y. (2020) Dynamic Light Caused Less Photosynthetic Suppression, Rather than More, under Nitrogen Deficit Conditions than under Sufficient Nitrogen Supply Conditions in Soybean. BMC Plant Biology, 20, Article No. 339.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02516-y
[32]  Laiĭsk, A.K. (1977) Kinetics of Photosynthesis and Photorespiration of C3 in Plants. Nauka, Moscow. (In Russia)
[33]  United States Department of Agriculture (2008) The Woody Plant Seed Manual. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.
[34]  Harley, P.C., Loreto, F., Di Marco, G. andSharkey, T.D. (1992) Theoretical Considerations When Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO2. Plant Physiology, 98, 1429-1436.
https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.4.1429
[35]  Momayyezi, M. and Guy, R.D. (2017) Substantial Role for Carbonic Anhydrase in Latitudinal Variation in Mesophyll Conductance of Populus trichocarpa Torr. & Gray. Plant, Cell & Environment, 40, 138-149.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12851
[36]  Ubierna, N., Cernusak, L.A., Holloway-Phillips, M., Busch, F.A., Cousins, A.B. and Farquhar, G.D. (2019) Critical Review: Incorporating the Arrangement of Mitochondria and Chloroplasts into Models of Photosynthesis and Carbon Isotope Discrimination. Photosynthesis Research, 141, 5-31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-019-00635-8
[37]  Sun, Y., Gu, L., Dickinson, R.E., Pallardy, S.G., Baker, J., Cao, Y., Damatta, F.M., Dong, X., Ellsworth, D., Van Goethem, D., Jensen, A.M., Law, B.E., Loos, R., Martins, S.C.V., Norby, R.J., Warren, J., Weston, D. and Winter, K. (2014) Asymmetrical Effects of Mesophyll Conductance on Fundamental Photosynthetic Parameters and Their Relationships Estimated from Leaf Gas Exchange Measurements. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37, 978-994.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12213
[38]  Walker, B.J. and Ort, D.R. (2015) Improved Method for Measuring the Apparent CO2 Photocompensation Point Resolves the Impact of Multiple Internal Conductances to CO2 to Net Gas Exchange. Plant, Cell & Environment, 38, 2462-2474.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12562
[39]  Wilbur, K.M. and Anderson, N.G. (1948) Electrometric and Colorimetric Determination of Carbonic Anhydrase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 176, 147-154.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)51011-5
[40]  Yin, X., Niu, Y., van der Putten, P.E.L. and Struik, P.C. (2020) The Kok Effect Revisited. New Phytologist, 227, 1764-1775.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16638
[41]  Xiao, Y., Sloan, J., Hepworth, C., Osborne, C.P., Fleming, A.J., Chen, X. and Zhu, X.-G. (2021) Estimating Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach to Modelling Photosynthesis in C3 Leaves. Plant, Cell & Environment, 44, 1436-1450.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13995
[42]  Farquhar, G.D. and Busch, F.A. (2017) Changes in the Chloroplastic CO2 Concentration Explain Much of the Observed Kok Effect: A Model. New Phytologist, 214, 570-584.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14512
[43]  Tholen, D., Ethier, G., Genty, B., Pepin, S. and Zhu, X.-G. (2012) Variable Mesophyll Conductance Revisited: Theoretical Background and Experimental Implications. Plant, Cell & Environment, 35, 2087-2103.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02538.x
[44]  Kaiser, E., Correa Galvis, V and Armbruster, U. (2019) Efficient Photosynthesis in Dynamic Light Environments: A Chloroplast’s Perspective. Biochemical Journal, 476, 2725-2741.
https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20190134
[45]  Eyland, D., van Wesemael, J., Lawson, T. and Carpentier, S. (2021) The Impact of Slow Stomatal Kinetics on Photosynthesis and Water Use Efficiency under Fluctuating Light. Plant Physiology, 186, 998-1012.
https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab114
[46]  Garmash, E.V. (2021) Role of Mitochondrial Alternative Oxidase in the Regulation of Cellular Homeostasis during Development of Photosynthetic Function in Greening Leaves. Plant Biology, 23, 221-228.
https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.13217
[47]  Li, Y., Gao, Y., Xu, X., Shen, Q. and Guo, S. (2009) Light-Saturated Photosynthetic Rate in High-Nitrogen Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Leaves Is Related to Chloroplastic CO2 Concentration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2351-2360.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp127
[48]  Silva-Pérez, V., de Faveri, J., Molero, G., Deery, D.M., Condon, A.G., Reynolds, M.P., Evans, J.R. and Furbank, R.T. (2020) Genetic Variation for Photosynthetic Capacity and Efficiency in Spring Wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 71, 2299-2311.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz439
[49]  Gu, L. and Sun, Y. (2014) Artefactual Responses of Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 and Irradiance Estimated with the Variable J and Online Isotope Discrimination Methods. Plant, Cell & Environment, 37, 1231-1249.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12232
[50]  Smith, N.G., Keenan, T.F., Colin Prentice, I., Wang, H., Wright, I.J., Niinemets, ü., Crous, K.Y., Domingues, T.F., Guerrieri, R., Yoko Ishida, F., Kattge, J., Kruger, E.L., Maire, V., Rogers, A., Serbin, S.P., Tarvainen, L., Togashi, H.F., Townsend, P.A., Wang, M., Weerasinghe, L.K. and Zhou, S.-X. (2019) Global Photosynthetic Capacity Is Optimized to the Environment. Ecology Letters, 22, 506-517.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13210
[51]  Henry, C., John, G.P., Pan, R., Bartlett, M.K., Fletcher, L.R., Scoffoni, C. and Sack, L. (2019) A Stomatal Safety-Efficiency Trade-off Constrains Responses to Leaf Dehydration. Nature Communications, 10, Article No. 3398.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11006-1
[52]  von Caemmerer, B.S. (2000) Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton.
[53]  Hanson, D.T., Stutz, S.S. and Boyer, J.S. (2016) Why Small Fluxes Matter: The Case and Approaches for Improving Measurements of Photosynthesis and (Photo) Respiration. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67, 3027-3039.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw139
[54]  Way, D.A., Aspinwall, M.J., Drake, J.E., Crous, K.Y., Campany, C.E., Ghannoum, O., Tissue, D.T. and Tjoelker, M.G. (2019) Responses of Respiration in the Light to Warming in Field-Grown Trees: A Comparison of the Thermal Sensitivity of the Kok and Laisk Methods. New Phytologist, 222, 132-143.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15566

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133