全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Rigid Designators and Descriptivism

DOI: 10.4236/jss.2023.112022, PP. 345-354

Keywords: Rigid Designators, Descriptivism, Weak Essentialism, Truth Value

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Kripke distinguishes necessity and priority as two different categories: priority is a notion of epistemology, while necessity is a notion of metaphysics. Based on this fundamental argument, Kripke objects to Descriptivism, which takes certain properties as the criteria of identity across all possible worlds, and he argues for the legitimacy of a posteriori necessary truths. Kripke also criticizes Russell’s methods for dealing with empty descriptions, and he puts forward a modal world to explain the rigidity of proper names. However, the concept of rigid designation faces some challenges, including Kripke admitting to weak essentialism when he rejects transworld identification, and the fact that the truth value of a sentence containing a rigid designator may change.

References

[1]  Garrett, B. J. (2005). Marcus, Ruth Charlotte Barcan. In J. R. Shook (Ed.), Dictionary of Modern American Philosophers (pp. 1599-1604). Continuum International.
https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350052444-0636
[2]  Gibbard, A. (1975). Contingent Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 187-221.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693273
[3]  Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Wiley Blackwell.
[4]  Lewis, D. (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell.
[5]  Martens, D. B. (2006). Combination, Convention, and Possibility. The Journal of Philosophy, 103, 577-586.
https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20061031111
[6]  Russell, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind, XIV, 479-493.
https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XIV.4.479
[7]  Sider, T. (2010). Logic for Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133