Backgroundandobjective:
Early and accurate diagnosis is one of the critical requirements for successful
management of all diseases. Yet, delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis remain as
vital problems, consequently impose adverse effects on patient treatment.
Sexually transmitted disease (STD) is one of the most common infectious
diseases, and more than one million of STD cases are acquired every day
globally. Misdiagnosis of STD inevitably exists, therefore should not be
overlooked. Being a medical diagnostic laboratory providing various STDs
diagnosing service in Hong Kong, we aimed to determine the misdiagnosis rate of
STDs and investigate the possible underlying cause. Methods: Specimens
were collected for STD diagnosis from multiple clinics during 1 June 2021 to 20
October 2021 from different clinics and hospitals were included in the study.
DNA extraction was performed using magnetic bead based method; then the extracted DNA was tested using the DiagCor GenoFlowTM STD Array kit to detect the existence of any targeted pathogens. Results: 1459 specimens were collected and included during the designated time period,
with 643 specimens found to be positive with at least one targeted STD
pathogen. 494 of these were found to be aligned with test ordered by
physicians, and the remaining 149 positive cases had at least one pathogen
detected but not requested to be tested by the physicians resulting in misdiagnosis. The overall misdiagnosis rate was
determined to be 23.2% (149/643), with high frequency of misdiagnosis
occurred to tests ordered for one to three pathogens detection. Also, Ureaplasmaurealyticum and/or Ureaplasmaparvum (UU/UP) was the commonest pathogen detected in this study. Conclusion:
The findings suggested incorrect test selection made by physicians was one of
the major reasons of STDs misdiagnosis in outpatient settings. To reduce
diagnostic errors in STD diagnosis, physicians are encouraged to select and
request test that allow detection of multiple pathogens, as co-infection of
multiple pathogens in STD patients is commonly observed. The correct selection
of test would not only benefit the patient, but also the public health.
References
[1]
Forsman, R.W. (1996) Why Is the Laboratory an Afterthought for Managed Care Organizations? Clinical Chemistry, 42, 813-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/42.5.813
[2]
Wians, F.H. (2009) Clinical Laboratory Tests: Which, Why, and What Do the Results Mean? Laboratory Medicine, 40, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1309/LM404L0HHUTWWUDD
[3]
Armbruster, D.A., Overcash, D.R. and Reyes, J. (2014) Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Automation in the 21st Century-Amat Victoria Curam (Victory loves Careful Preparation). The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, 35, 143.
[4]
Singh, H., Meyer, A.N. and Thomas, E.J. (2014) The Frequency of Diagnostic Errors in Outpatient Care: Estimations from Three Large Observational Studies Involving US Adult Populations. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 727-731. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002627
[5]
Balogh, E.P., Miller, B.T. and Ball, J.R. (2015) Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press (US), Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/21794
[6]
Schiff, G.D., Hasan, O., Kim, S., Abrams, R., Cosby, K. and McNutt, R.A. (2009) Diagnostic Error in Medicine: Analysis of 583 Physician-Reported Errors. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1881-1887. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333
[7]
Van Gerwen, O.T., Camino, A.F., Sharma, J., Kissinger, P.J. and Muzny, C.A. (2021) Epidemiology, Natural History, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Trichomonas vaginalis in Men. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 73, 1119-1124. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab514
[8]
Fuchs, W. and Brockmeyer, N.H. (2014) Sexually Transmitted Infections. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 12, 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.12310
[9]
Khan, A., Plummer, D., Hussain, R. and Minichiello, V. (2007) Sexual Risk Assessment in General Practice: Evidence from a New South Wales Survey. Sexual Health, 4, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH06012
[10]
Muralidhar, S. (2015) Molecular Methods in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS, 36, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.4103/0253-7184.156686
[11]
Chan, C.L., Chan, W.Y., Cheng, C.H.K. and Xia, P. (2016) What Is Missing in STD Screening in Hong Kong? Current Research in Medicine, 7, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3844/amjsp.2016.13.18
[12]
Zhang, N., Wang, R., Li, X., Liu, X., Tang, Z. and Liu, Y. (2014) Are Ureaplasma spp. a Cause of Nongonococcal Urethritis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 9, e113771. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113771
[13]
Huang, C., Zhu, H.L., Xu, K.R., Wang, S.Y., Fan, L.Q. and Zhu, W.B. (2015) Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma Infection and Male Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Andrology, 3, 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12078
[14]
Piscopo, R.C., Guimarães, R.V., Ueno, J., Ikeda, F., Jarmy-Di Bella, Z.I., Girão, M.J. and Samama, M. (2020) Increased Prevalence of Endocervical Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma Colonization in Infertile Women with Tubal Factor. JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 24, 152-157. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190078