Today, the oil and gas industry, and in particular hydraulic fracturing operations, have come under increasing pressure from regulators and the public to reduce emissions. As the industry evolves, oil and gas producers are in the position of evaluating alternative technologies which will support their objectives of reducing their overall emissions profile and carbon footprint. As a response, the deployment of technology and solutions to reduce emissions related to hydraulic fracturing applications has recently accelerated, creating various options to address these industry challenges. BJ Energy Solutions and West Virginia University have been working on the application and emissions characterization of various hydraulic fracturing technologies. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency and resultant emissions from various technologies, including natural gas reciprocating engines, diesel-natural gas dual-fuel engines, large (>24 MW) gas turbines, and direct drive turbines. The study involved the development of an emissions model with the purpose of estimating total emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O) and exhaust methane (CH4) slip, all Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), and converted to tons of CO2 equivalent emissions per day of operation. The model inputs are the required Hydraulic Horsepower (HHP) based on pumping rate and pressure for various shale play scenarios. The model calculates emissions from the TITAN, which is a direct-drive turbine model fielded by BJ, using data collected following U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) testing protocols. The model also calculates and compares other hydraulic fracturing technologies utilizing published Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) data. Relevant EPA-regulated criteria emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO) and Particulate Matter (PM) are also reported. Modeling results demonstrated that in most cases, the TITAN gas turbine system has lower total GHG emissions than conventional diesel and other next-generation technologies, and also has lower criteria emissions. The benefits of the TITAN gas turbine system compared to the other technologies stems from significantly lower methane slip, and the high-power transfer efficiency resulting from directly connecting a turbine to a reciprocating pump, despite the comparatively lower thermal efficiency.
References
[1]
United States Energy Information Administration (2022) Independent Statistics and Analysis. Monthly Energy Review, OE/EIA-0035, 5.
[2]
Omara, M., Sullivan, M.R., Xiang, L., Subramanian, R., Robinson, A.L. and Presto, A.A. (2016) Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin. Environmental Science & Technology, 50, 2017-2099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b05503
[3]
United States Energy Information Administration (2016) Independent Statistics and Analysis, “U.S. Energy Facts—Imports and Exports—U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)”. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/us-energy-facts/imports-and-exports.php
[4]
The American Oil and Gas Reporter. “U.S. Rig Count Data Available from Baker Hughes”. https://www.aogr.com/web-exclusives/us-rig-count/2022
[5]
Chapa, S. (2019, April 30) Baker Hughes Chooses Permian Basin to Debut “Electric Frack” Technology. https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/Baker-Hughes-chooses-Permian-Basin-to-debut-13808592.php
[6]
United States Environmental Protection Agency (2004) Final Rule for Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-06-29/pdf/04-11293.pdf
[7]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Nonroad Large Spark-Ignition Engines: Exhaust and Evaporative Emission Standards. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=P100OA08.pdf
[8]
Johnson, D.R., Heltzel, R., Nix, A.C., et al. (2017) Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency of In-Use High Horsepower Diesel, Dual Fuel, and Natural Gas Engines for Unconventional Well Development. Applied Energy, 206, 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.234
[9]
Jacobs, T. (2020) Electric Frac Fleets Rise from 3% to 30% of US Shale Market amid Diesel Drop. Journal of Petroleum Technology. https://jpt.spe.org/electric-frac-fleets-rise-3-30-us-shale-market-amid-diesel-drop
[10]
Procyk, A. (2022) Simultaneous Fracturing Increases Completion Efficiency. Oil and Gas Journal. https://www.ogj.com/drilling-production/article/14223163/simultaneous-fracturing-increases-completion-efficiency
[11]
Environmental Protection Agency (2022) Title 40—Protection of Environment Chapter I—Environmental Protection Agency Subchapter W—Air Programs Part 98—Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-98/subpart-W
[12]
Environmental Protection Agency (2022) Title 40—Protection of Environment Chapter I—Environmental Protection Agency Subchapter C—Air Programs Part 98—General Stationary Fuel Combustion Sources. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-98/subpart-C
[13]
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, 151 p.
[14]
Costa, G.K. and Sepehri, N. (2018) Understanding Overall Efficiency of Hydrostatic Pumps and Motors. International Journal of Fluid Power, 19, 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14399776.2018.1476306
[15]
Gundabattini, E., Kuppan, R., Solomon, D.G., et al. (2021) A Review on Methods of Finding Losses and Cooling Methods to Increase Efficiency of Electric Machines. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.014
[16]
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42 Section 3.2, Natural Gas-Fired Reciprocating Engines. https://www3.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch03/bgdocs/b03s02.pdf
[17]
Johnson, D., Heltzel, R., Nix, A., et al. (2018) Estimated Emissions from the Prime-Movers of Unconventional Natural Gas Well Development Using Recently Collected In-Use Data in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 52, 5499-5508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06694
[18]
Avergard, P. and Lindstrom, F. (2003) Modeling of Crankcase Gas Behavior in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine. Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund. http://www.control.lth.se/documents/2003/5699.pdf
[19]
United States Environmental Protection Agency (2004) Exhaust and Crankcase Emission Factors for Nonroad Engine Modeling—Compression-Ignition. NR-009d, 241 p. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P10005BI.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2000+Thru+2005&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C00thru05%5CTxt%5C00000013%5CP10005BI.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL
[20]
NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (2022) Climate at a Glance: Divisional Mapping. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/cag
[21]
Canada, Environment and Climate Change (2022, May 25) Government of Canada/Gouvernement Du Canada. Climate. Government of Canada/Gouvernement du Canada. https://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=2718&autofwd=1
[22]
U.S. Geological Survey (2019) USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model. https://elevation.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/3DEPElevation/ImageServer
[23]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership (2022) Section 2. Technology Characterization—Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/catalog_of_chp_technologies_section_2._technology_characterization_-_reciprocating_internal_combustion_engines.pdf
[24]
Vinhaes, B., et al. (2022) Experimental Studies of Low-Load Limit in a Stoichiometric Micro-Pilot Diesel Natural Gas Engine.
[25]
Jabeck, B. (2014, October) The Impact of Generator Set Underloading https://www.cat.com/en_US/by-industry/electric-power/Articles/White-papers/the-impact-of-generator-set-underloading.html
[26]
Weir Oil and Gas (2017) QWS 2500 XL Power End Operation Instruction and Service Manual.
[27]
Caterpillar Inc. (2013) Mechanical Application and Installation Guide for the TH48-E80 Petroleum Transmission.
[28]
Taylor, G.W. and Eng, P. (2003) Review of the Incidence, Energy Use and Costs of Passenger Vehicle Idling. Prepared for the Office of Energy Efficiency, Natural Resources Canada.
[29]
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy (2005) Energy Conservation Standards for Certain Consumer Products and Commercial and Industrial Equipment. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-20701
Pejovski, D., Najdenkoski, K. and Digalovski, M. (2017) Impact of Different Harmonic Loads on Distribution Transformers. Procedia Engineering, 202, 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.696
[32]
Waide, P. and Brunner, C. (2011) Energy-Efficiency Policy Opportunities for Electric Motor-Driven Systems. IEA Energy Papers, No. 2011/07, OECD Publishing, Paris.
[33]
Faiz, J., Ghazizadeh, M. and Oraee, H. (2015) Derating of Transformers under Non-Linear Load Current and Non-Sinusoidal Voltage—An Overview. IET Electric Power Applications, 9, 486-495. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-epa.2014.0377
[34]
Burt, C.M., Piao, X.S., Gaudi, F., et al. (2008) Electric Motor Efficiency under Variable Frequencies and Loads. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 134, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(129)
[35]
Rozegnal, B., Albrechtowicz, P., Mamcarz, D., et al. (2021) The Power Losses in Cable Lines Supplying Nonlinear Loads. Energies, 14, Article 1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14051374
[36]
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Improving Motor and Drive System Performance (2014). https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f15/amo_motors_sourcebook_web.pdf
[37]
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Premium Efficiency Motor Selection and Application Guide (2014). https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f15/amo_motors_handbook_web.pdf
[38]
Eaton, Power Distribution Systems Typical Components of a Power System, August 2017. https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/medium-voltage-power-distribution-control-systems/vacclad-w-pages/Heat-loss-table.pdf
