GTD (Gestational Trophoblastic Disease) is a pathology that encompasses benign and malignant clinical forms, affects women of childbearing age, has a variable incidence and is more frequent in developing or underdeveloped countries, colliding with the economic barrier. The frequent absence of clear protocols and guidelines for the correct diagnosis and treatment of the aforementioned pathology results in inadequate risk classification, imprecise treatment and failed post-therapeutic observation, increasing the risk of relapses, morbidity and mortality. The present study aims to compare the different national and international guidelines in the management of GTD, through an integrative review. Nine articles were selected and it was observed that the main international reference centers are agreed with the management suggested by the IFGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), being the conduct in the Hydatidiform Mole (HM): evacuation by suction and curettage under ultrasound guidance, followed by hCG monitoring every 1 - 2 weeks until normalized; in low-risk GTN (Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasm): chemotherapy with methotrexate or actinomycin D, in high-risk: EMA/CO protocol, in ultra-high-risk EMA/PE, methotrexate with radiotherapy for brain metastases. All medical societies recommend the registration of these patients in GTD screening centers, endorse the use of the IFGO scoring system (2000) and recommend the surgical management of placental site trophoblastic or epithelioid tumors, as chemotherapy is less effective in these cases. The controversies are in the proper follow-up after the treatment of HM, use of ultrasound to evacuate the uterus, administration of anti-D immunoglobulin, time of oxytocin infusion and rescue regimens that can be used in cases of resistant or recurrent GTN. Establishing and complying with consistent guidelines can improve patient care, with early diagnosis of the pathology and its complications, reducing the rate of recurrence, morbidity and mortality, especially in less developed countries.
References
[1]
Ferraz, L., de Fátima Lopes, P., Amim-Júnior, J., et al. (2015) Atualizacao no diagnóstico e tratamento da gravidez molar. Revista Jornal Brasileiro de Medicina, 103, 6-12.
[2]
Braga, A., Mora, P., et al. (2019) Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Worldwide. World Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v10.i2.28
[3]
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (2022) Linha de cuidados para doenca trofoblástica gestacional [recurso eletronico]. Associacao Brasileira de Doenca Trofoblástica Gestacional.
[4]
Santaballa, A., García, Y., et al. (2018) SEOM Clinical Guidelines in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease (2017). Clinical & Translational Oncology, 20, 38-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-017-1793-0
[5]
lima, L.L.A., et al. (2016) Correlacoes clínico radiológicas em pacientes com doenca trofoblástica gestacional. Radiologia Brasileira, 49, 241-250.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0073
[6]
Mota, M.L.O., et al. (2022) Mola Hidatiforme: Apresentacoes Clínicas Benignas da Doenca Trofoblástica Gestacional. In: de Freitas, G.L., Sleiman, H.K., de A. Paganini, J.C., Eds., Saúde da Mulher: Epidemiologia, intervencoes, casos clínicos e políticas de saúde, 6th Edition, Irati: Pasteur, 137-143. https://doi.org/10.29327/568096.6-16
[7]
Braga, A., et al. (2019) Doenca trofoblástica gestacional. Protocolo Febrasgo—Obstetrícia, Comissao Nacional Especializada em Doenca Trofoblástica Gestacional. Femina, 47, 6-17.
[8]
Tsakiridis, I., Sonia, G., et al. (2020) Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: A Comparative Review of National and International Guidelines. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 75, 747-756.
https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000848
[9]
Khachani, I., Alami, M.H. and Bezad, R. (2017) Implementation and Monitoring of a Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Management Program in a Tertiary Hospital in Morocco: Opportunities and Challenges. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2017, Article ID: 5093472. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5093472
[10]
Ngan, H.Y.S., Seckl, M.J., et al. (2018) Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 143, 79-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12615
[11]
FIGO Oncology Committee (2002) FIGO Staging for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia 2000. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 77, 285-287.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00063-2
[12]
Seckl, M.J., Sebire, N.J., et al. (2013) Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Annals of Oncology, 24, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt345
[13]
Tidy, J., Seckl, M. and Hancock, B.W. (2021) On Behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease. BJOG, 128, e27.
[14]
Ranzcog (2017) The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease.
[15]
Yamagami, W., et al. (2020) Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 Guidelines for Treatment of Uterine Body Neoplasms. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, 31, e18. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e18