In laser hair removal treatments on dark skin, the high concentration of melanin in the skin competes with the melanin in the hair. During standard laser procedures, with wavelengths of 755 nm or 810 nm, a high level of laser light absorption by melanin in the skin is observed. Therefore, to avoid side effects, lower fluence values are used, which further reduces hair-removal efficacy. To improve results, 810 nm diode lasers operating in dynamic mode, with high frequency and multiple passes, are typically used. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of triple-wavelength diode lasers (810 nm, 940 nm, 1060 nm) with that of 810 nm diode lasers on Indian patients. A side-by-side comparison was performed using a triple-wavelength diode laser in stamping mode on one side, and an 810 nm diode laser in dynamic mode on the other. Three subjects with skin type IV on the Fitzpatrick scale participated in the study. Efficacy was assessed through hair counting using clinical photographs, taken before and after the treatments, and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Additionally, comparisons related to epidermal heating and thermal damage to the hair follicle were conducted through mathematical 3D simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics® software. Side effects were also evaluated. A superior end point was observed with triple wavelength compared to the 810 nm diode laser. Hair counting showed a 27% greater hair reduction with triple wavelength. No adverse effects were observed. Thermal simulations revealed 29% higher thermal damage with the triple-wavelength laser compared to the 810 nm diode laser. To conclude, on darker skin types, the triple-wavelength diode laser has been shown to be more effective at removing hair, compared to the 810 nm diode laser, while also being a safe procedure.
References
[1]
Altshuler, G.B. anderson, R.R., Manstein, D., Zenzie, H.H. and Smirnov, M. (2001) Extended Theory of Selective Photothermolysis. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 29, 416-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1136
[2]
Velez, M. and Cisneros, J. (2008) Laser in Dermatology and Dermocosmetics: Fundamentals of Photoepilation. 2nd Edition, Aula Médica, Madrid.
[3]
Dierickx, C., Alora, M. and Dover, J. (1999) A Clinical Overview of Hair Removal Using Lasers and Light Sources. Dermatologic Clinics, 17, 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70092-9
[4]
Bouzari, N., Tabatabai, H., Abbasi, Z., Firooz, A. and Dowlati, Y. (2004) Laser Hair Removal: Comparison of Long-Pulsed ND:YAG, Long-Pulsed Alexandrite and Long-Pulsed Diode Lasers. Dermatologic Surgery, 30, 498-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30163.x
[5]
Campos, V.B., Dierickx, C.C., Farinelli, W.A., Lin, T.Y., Manuskiatti, W. and Anderson, R.R. (2000) Hair Removal with an 800-nm Pulsed Diode Laser. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 43, 442-447. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2000.107239
[6]
Goldberg, D.J. (2018) One-Year Follow-Up Results of Hair Removal Using an 810 nm Diode Laser. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 17, 775-778. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12757
[7]
Pai, G., Bhat, P., Mallya, H. and Gold, M. (2011) Safety and Efficacy of Low-Fluence, High-Repetition Rate versus High-Fluence, Low-Repetition Rate 810-nm Diode Laser for Permanent Hair Removal—A Split-Face Comparison Study. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, 13, 134-137. https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2011.594057
[8]
Barolet, D. (2012) Low Fluence-High Repetition Rate Diode Laser Hair Removal 12-Month Evaluation: Reducing Pain and Risks While Keeping Clinical Efficacy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 44, 277-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22021
[9]
Vélez-González, M., Viera-Mármol, G. and Vergara-Vallejo, G. (2021) Clinical Study of High-Power Diode Laser in Dynamic Mode for Fine Hair Removal: Effects of Pulse Duration on Efficacy and Safety. Aesthetic Medicine, 7, 20-28.
[10]
Lim, S. and Lanigan, S. (2006) A Review of the Adverse Effects of Laser Removal. Lasers in Medical Science, 21, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-006-0377-y
[11]
Godse, K., Godse, G. and Patil, A. (2021) Triple Wavelength Diode Laser for Hair Removal: A Perspective. Cosmoderma, 1, Article No. 57. https://doi.org/10.25259/CSDM_59_2021
[12]
Gold, M., Hellman, J., Dahan, S. and Mulholland, R. (2019) Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Blended Mode Diode Laser for Hair Removal. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 9, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2019.91002
[13]
Fajardo-Urdiales, C., Rodriguez-Casimiro, A., Villena, J., Pérez, M., Vicente, J. and Viera-Mármol, G. (2019) Comparative Clinical Study and Thermal Modelling of Photoepilation of Thin Hair by Primelase Excellence 810 nm and Blend and Soprano XL 810 nm. International Research Journal of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, 3, 53-60.
[14]
Noyman, Y., Levi, A., Reiter, O. and Lapidoth, M. (2021) Using Blend Wavelengths in Order to Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Laser Hair Removal. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20, 3913-3916. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14535
[15]
Gold, M., Biron, J., Wilson, A., Viera Mármol, G., Vargas, R., Castillejos, M. and Ferrandez, J. (2022) Safety and Efficacy for Hair Removal in Dark Skin Types III and IV with a High-Powered, Combined Wavelength (810, 940 and 1060 nm) Diode Laser: A Single-Site Pilot Study. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 21, 1979-1985. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.14926
[16]
Viera-Marmol, G. and Villena, J. (2019) New 3D in Silico Model of Hair and Skin Heating during Laser Hair Removal. International Research and Publications in Medical Sciences, 3, 15-24.