全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

语言线性序列特征的认知分析
A Cognitive Analysis of the Linear Sequence of Language

DOI: 10.12677/ML.2022.1011371, PP. 2725-2732

Keywords: 线性,词汇,语法,语义,识解,突显
Linearity
, Lexis, Grammar, Semantic, Construal, Prominence

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

语言符号在本质上属听觉性质,具有线性特征。这一特征在音系结构、词法结构和句法结构上体现为各组构成分的横组合关系;在语义上则体现为时间、空间以及各类逻辑关系。从认知的角度来看,这种线性特征反映了人类感知世界和识解经验的特殊方式,从突显和邻近原则等角度均能做出合理解读。
The linguistic signals are auditory in nature, having the characteristics of linearity. This linear feature is realized as a syntagmatic relation in phonlogical, morphological and syntactic structures. In semantic level, it is realized as the linear sequence of time, space and different kinds of logic. From a cognitive perspective, these linear features demonstrate the ways that language users’ understanding and construal of the world experience, particularly from the perspective of prominence and closeness principle.

References

[1]  Saussure, F. (2001) Course in General Linguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.
[2]  索绪尔. 普通语言学教程[M]. 高名凯, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1980.
[3]  杨忠, 张绍杰. 语言符号的线性特征问题[M]//朱永生(主编). 语言 语篇 语境. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1993.
[4]  柴改英. 顺序拟象性原则及其对系统功能语法的阐释[J]. 外国语2000(1): 24-27.
[5]  秦洪武. 语言结构的顺序象似性[J]. 外语研究2001(1): 39-42.
[6]  文旭. 词序的拟象性探索[J]. 外语学刊, 2001(3): 90-96.
[7]  彭芳. 语言线性序列的理据――语义/语用层面[J]. 外语教学, 2003(6): 33-37.
[8]  Halliday, M.A.K. (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, London.
[9]  Eggins, S. (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Pinter, Lon-don.
[10]  Thompson, G. (1996) Introducing Functional Grammar. Arnold, London.
[11]  胡壮麟, 朱永生, 张德禄, 李战子. 系统功能语言学概论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005.
[12]  向成东, 韩炜. 语篇象似性及其认知基础[J]. 外语研究, 2003(1): 37-42.
[13]  赵艳芳. 认知语言学概论[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2001.
[14]  Langacker, R.W. (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
[15]  Greenberg, J. (1966) Universals of Grammar. 2nd Edition, MIT Press, Cam-bridge.
[16]  Givón, T. (1994) Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations. In: Simone, R., Ed., Iconicity in Language, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 47-76.
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.110.07giv
[17]  Talmy, L. (2001) Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
[18]  Saeed, J. (1997) Semantics. Blackwell, Oxford.
[19]  Brown, G. and Yule, G. (2000) Discourse Analysis. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.
[20]  彭宣维. 英汉语篇综合对比[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000.
[21]  Langendonck, W. (1995) Categories of Word Order Iconicity. In: Landsberg, M.E., Ed., Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, 79-90.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110882926.79

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133