|
|
大学生核心胜任特征培养及成长评估模型研究
|
Abstract:
提升大学生核心素养是人才强国战略的重要实现途径。基于核心胜任特征的理论和思想，提出大学生核心胜任特征模型，设计出大学生核心胜任特征成长评估的实验方案，进行40项模块的干预课程培训，并采用核心胜任特征前后测问卷对干预效果进行验证，采用差异性检验(t检验)和学生成长百分等级模型(SGP检验)进行评估。干预培训的评估结果表明，实验组在团体水平的得分显著高于控制组，在个人水平上获得的“成长”效果显著优于控制组，证明了SGP模型在评估大学生核心胜任特征成长上卓有成效，为其他基于胜任特征培养和评估方案有效性验证供了新的方法学依据。
Improving core competency of college students is an important way to realize the strategy of strengthening the country with talents. Based on the theories and thoughts of core competency characteristics, this paper proposed a model of core competency traits of college students, designed an experimental program for assessing the growth of core competency characteristics of college students, conducted a 40-module intervention course, and validated the intervention effect by using a pre- and post-test questionnaire on core competency characteristics, and evaluated it by using a test of variance (T-Test) and Student Growth Percentile model (SGP test). The results of the intervention training showed that the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group at the group level and achieved significantly better “growth” than the control group at the individual level, which proved the effectiveness of the SGP model in assessing the growth of core competency characteristics of college students and provided a new methodological basis for the validation of other competency-based training and assessment programs. It provides a new methodological basis for the validation of other competency-based training and assessment programs.
| [1] | 林崇德(2017a). 构建中国化的学生发展核心素养. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 66-73. |
| [2] | 林崇德(2017b). 中国学生核心素养研究. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 145-154. |
| [3] | 时勘(2022). 核心胜任特征的成长评估模型研究. 科学出版社. |
| [4] | 王晓平, 齐森, 谢小庆(2018). 美国学校“成长测量”的7种主要方法. 中国考试, (6), 21-27. |
| [5] | 谢小庆(2019). 用于成长评估的学生成长百分等级模型: 来自美国的经验. 教育测量与评价, (6), 3-9. |
| [6] | Betebenner, D. (2009). Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00161.x |
| [7] | Betebenner, D. W. (2010). SGP: Student Growth Percentile and Percentile Growth Projection/Trajectory Functions. R Package Version 0.0-6. |
| [8] | Betebenner, D. W. (2011). A Technical Overview of the Student Growth Percentile Methodology: Student Growth Percentiles and Percentile Growth Projections/Trajectories. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. |
| [9] | Castellano, K. E., & Ho, A. D. (2013). Contrasting OLS and Quantile Regression Approaches to Student “Growth” Percentiles. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38, 190-215. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998611435413 |
| [10] | McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for Competence Rather than for “Intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14. |
| [11] | https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092 |
| [12] | Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 |
| [13] | Schumaker, L. (2007). Spline Functions: Basic Theory. Cambridge University Press. |
| [14] | https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618994 |
| [15] | Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at Work Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons. |
